<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<Publication_List>
	<publicationid>2687</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>433</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0433-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Impacts of rattan cane harvesting on vegetation structure and tree diversity of Conservation Forest in Buton, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Atiek Widayati and Bruce Carlisle</author>
	<yearpubs>2012</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Forest Ecology and Management</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier B.V.</publisher>
	<volume>266</volume>
	<edition>2012</edition>
	<mainpages>206-215</mainpages>
	<abstract>Lambusango Forest, Buton, Indonesia, is an example of the potential for conflict between forest conservation and long standing local extraction of Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs), in this case rattan cane harvesting. This paper investigates the impacts of rattan harvesting on tree and understorey vegetation structure, species richness and diversity. Tree and understorey vegetation characteristics and soil and
topographic variables were recorded in forest plots. Interviews with rattan harvesters recorded information on harvesting techniques and locations. The relationships between tree and understorey vegetation characteristics and soils, topography and rattan harvesting techniques were assessed with the multivariate ordination technique of Redundancy Analysis (RDA). Analysis of the relationships with rattan harvesting
proximity and forest designation zone used Multivariate Analyses of Covariance (MANCOVA). Tree species richness and diversity are primarily affected by slope gradient and altitude, while tree size is affected mainly by soil chemical factors. Only a small part of the variation in tree structure measures can be attributed to the impacts of rattan cane harvesting. Stronger adverse effects on understorey vegetation density, including tree saplings and seedlings, were found. This is thought to be a case of rattan harvesting exacerbating the effects of competition between rattan plants and other understorey vegetation. Longer term monitoring of forest characteristics could provide stronger understanding of the impacts. However, rattan harvesting appears to have little effect on forest structure and diversity in Lambusango Forest, suggesting that relatively small scale NTFP extraction does not necessarily conflict with forest conservation.</abstract>
	<keywords>Non-timber forest product, Forest conservation, Rattan cane harvesting, Forest structure, Buton Island</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Widayati A and Carlisle B. 2012. Impacts of rattan cane harvesting on vegetation structure and tree diversity of Conservation Forest in Buton, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management. 266(2012):P. 206-215.</citation>
	<publicationid>2686</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>152</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0152-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Burung-burung Agroforest di Sumatera</maintitle>
	<author>Asep Ayat</author>
	<editor>Ani Mardiastuti</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>112</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-60-6</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Buku ?Burung-burung Agroforest di Sumatera? merupakan sebuah
rangkuman dari rentetan penelitian yang dilakukan di empat kawasan
agroforest Sumatera, yaitu agroforest karet di Simalungun dan Batang
Toru (Sumatera Utara), agroforest karet di Bungo (Jambi) dan agroforest
kopi di Sumberjaya (Lampung).<br/>
Agroforest merupakan salah satu tipe penggunaan lahan yang
banyak diterapkan oleh masyarakat di Sumatera karena dianggap
memiliki fungsi dalam mendukung kebutuhan ekonomi masyarakat
dari tanaman utamanya dan memiliki fungsi ekologi dalam menjaga
kelestarian sumber daya air, kesuburan tanah, pengatur iklim dan habitat
bagi keanekaragaman hayati.<br/>
Hasil penelitian di Sumatera menunjukkan bahwa sekitar 300
jenis burung ditemukan pada kawasan agroforest dan sekitarnya. Hal ini
menjadi indikasi nyata bahwa kawasan agroforest di Sumatera mampu
memberikan daya dukung sebagai habitat burung. Artinya, kawasan
agroforest dapat menyediakan kebutuhan hidup seperti pakan dan tempat
tinggal bagi berbagai jenis burung.<br/>
Buku ini dirancang untuk pegangan bagi masyarakat dan
pemerhati keanekaragaman hayati agar dapat mengenali jenisjenis
burung sehingga tertarik untuk mempelajari lebih lanjut tentang
kehidupan dan manfaatnya. Penulis berharap masyarakat dan para
pemerhati keanekaragaman hayati dapat memberikan kontribusi pada
pelestarian jenis-jenis burung sebagai indikator lingkungan dari aspek
keanekaragaman hayati.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>-1</webdisplay>
	<citation>Ayat A. 2011. Burung-burung Agroforest di Sumatera. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 112 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2685</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>289</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0289-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rice fish ? land use diversification with many socioeconomic and environmental potentials ? In Vietnamese language</maintitle>
	<author>Elisabeth Simelton, Hoang Thi Hieu, Dam Viet Bac, Nguyen Thi Hoa and Pham Thanh Loan</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Poster presented at Workshop on Ethnic Minority People in Disaster Management and Climate Change Response</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Land use and income diversification are well-known approaches to spread and reduce the risks of harvest losses. However, with the increasing pressure on the uplands for food, fiber and fuel, the role increases of land uses that serves multiple purposes, such as agro/biodiversity conservation, watershed protection, food security and livelihood improvement.<br/>
The objective of this research is to identify pathways towards multifunctional land-uses, in particular identify socioeconomic and environmental trade-offs associated with these transitions. Here we present the results for rice-fish cultivation ? a traditional way of organic agriculture and land use diversification.]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>Vietnamese</language>
	<citation>Simelton E, Hoang TH, Dam VB, Nguyen TH and Pham TL. Rice fish – land use diversification with many socioeconomic and environmental potentials – In Vietnamese language. : Poster presented at Workshop on Ethnic Minority People in Disaster Management and Climate Change ResponseHanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2011. </citation>
	<publicationid>2684</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>288</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0288-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rice fish ? land use diversification with many socioeconomic and environmental potentials</maintitle>
	<author>Elisabeth Simelton, Hoang Thi Hieu, Dam Viet Bac, Nguyen Thi Hoa and Pham Thanh Loan</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Poster presented at Workshop on Ethnic Minority People in Disaster Management and Climate Change Response</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Land use and income diversification are well-known approaches to spread and reduce the risks of harvest losses. However, with the increasing pressure on the uplands for food, fiber and fuel, the role increases of land uses that serves multiple purposes, such as agro/biodiversity conservation, watershed protection, food security and livelihood improvement.<br/>
The objective of this research is to identify pathways towards multifunctional land-uses, in particular identify socioeconomic and environmental trade-offs associated with these transitions. Here we present the results for rice-fish cultivation ? a traditional way of organic agriculture and land use diversification.]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Simelton E, Hoang TH, Dam VB, Nguyen TH and Pham TL. Rice fish – land use diversification with many socioeconomic and environmental potentials. : Poster presented at Workshop on Ethnic Minority People in Disaster Management and Climate Change ResponseHanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2011. </citation>
	<publicationid>2683</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>LE</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>174</cnposition>
	<callnumber>LE0174-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Frequently asked questions and answers on payment for forest environmental services - Basis for designing locally appropriate mechanisms of payment for environmental services- In Vietnamese language</maintitle>
	<author>Do Trong Hoan, Alba Saray-Teran, Dam Viet Bac and Hoang Minh Ha</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>Vietnamese</language>
	<citation>Do Trong H, Saray-Teran A, Dam VB and Hoang MH. 2010. Frequently asked questions and answers on payment for forest environmental services - Basis for designing locally appropriate mechanisms of payment for environmental services- In Vietnamese language. [Leaflet].Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2682</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>36</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0036-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Farmers? tree nurseries in Vietnam: opportunities and constraints</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, James M Roshetko, Marc Dumas-Johansen, Nguyen Thi Hoa, Doan Duc Lan, Dinh Ngoc Lan and Ramni Jamnadass</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>12</totalpages>
	<abstract>Farmers? nursery can play an inportant rol in supporting government reforestration programs as well as the development of local agroforestry systems that enhance the livelihoods of farmers. They have the protential to be commercial enterprises that enhance the livelihood of farmer-operators. However a lack of access to quality gerplasm, technical support and markets limits the development and success of farmers? nursery. The policy brief has also shown the main way to overcome these constraints.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Roshetko JM, Dumas-Johansen M, Nguyen TH, Doan DL, Dinh NL and Jamnadass R. 2011. Farmers’ tree nurseries in Vietnam: opportunities and constraints. Hanoi, Vietnam. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 12 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2681</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>50</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0050-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agfor Sulawesi - Januari 2012</maintitle>
	<author>Lia Dahlia, James M Roshetko and Robert Finlayson</author>
	<yearpubs>2012</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<edition>Januari 2012</edition>
	<mainpages>1-6</mainpages>
	<abstract>The Agroforestry and Forestry in Sulawesi: Linking Knowledge with Action (AgFor Sulawesi) project works with local communities, governments and non-government organizations to improve farmers' incomes through agroforestry and landscape-management systems. Agroforestry is a combination of agriculture and forestry: trees that farmers want are grown on their farms or community land, often mixed with other crops and livestock. When these agroforests grow old they often look more like natural forests than tree farms because they are usually a mix of different types of trees. Experience has shown that agroforests can improve farmers' incomes and help protect natural forests. AgFor Sulawesi plans to solve several problems in order to improve people's lives and help protect the environment.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian - English</language>
	<citation>Dahlia L, Roshetko JM and Finlayson R. 2012. Agfor Sulawesi - Januari 2012. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2680</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>151</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0151-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Stakeholder Agency in Rural Development Policy: Articulating Co-governance in Vietnam ? In Vietnamese language</maintitle>
	<editor>Neil Powell, Asa Gerger Swartling and Hoang Minh Ha</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>263</totalpages>
	<abstract>One of the major coclusions of this book is that owing to the gaps and inefficiencies in present rural development policies, stakeholders can either completely bypass many pollicies or adapt them in such a way that they are better aligned to their direct needs, Cast in a negative light, this outcome could be viewed as a problem in terms policy of compliance. Findings from the different cases suggest, however, that this trend can instead be viewed as a means to pave the way for a precess that has already begum ? power sharing and negotiation between the state, the commercial sector and civil society, This conclusion has been taken on board when formulating the PEARL concet, in which Sweden can share its lessons learned on co-governance on a level playing field.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>Vietnamese</language>
	<citation>2011. Stakeholder Agency in Rural Development Policy: Articulating Co-governance in Vietnam – In Vietnamese language. Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 263 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2679</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>150</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0150-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Stakeholder Agency in Rural Development Policy: Articulating Co-governance in Vietnam</maintitle>
	<editor>Neil Powell, Asa Gerger Swartling and Hoang Minh Ha</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>167</totalpages>
	<abstract>One of the major coclusions of this book is that owing to the gaps and inefficiencies in present rural development policies, stakeholders can either completely bypass many pollicies or adapt them in such a way that they are better aligned to their direct needs, Cast in a negative light, this outcome could be viewed as a problem in terms policy of compliance. Findings from the different cases suggest, however, that this trend can instead be viewed as a means to pave the way for a precess that has already begum ? power sharing and negotiation between the state, the commercial sector and civil society, This conclusion has been taken on board when formulating the PEARL concet, in which Sweden can share its lessons learned on co-governance on a level playing field.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>2011. Stakeholder Agency in Rural Development Policy: Articulating Co-governance in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 167 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2678</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>167</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0167-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Payments for environmental services (PES) from tourism: A realistic incentive to improve local livelihoods and sustain forest landscapes in Viet Nam?s northern highlands</maintitle>
	<author>Kira de Groot</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Wageningen University and Research Centre</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Wageningen, The Netherlands</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>113</totalpages>
	<descript1>Department of Environmental Sciences</descript1>
	<descript2>Msc</descript2>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>de Groot K. 2011. Payments for environmental services (PES) from tourism: A realistic incentive to improve local livelihoods and sustain forest landscapes in Viet Nam’s northern highlands. Wageningen, The Netherlands. : Wageningen University and Research Centre. 113 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2677</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>432</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0432-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, Do Trong Hoan, Minh Thoa Pham, Meine van Noordwijk and Peter A Minang</author>
	<yearpubs>2012</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Journal of Land Use Policy</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-15</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[At very high policy levels, efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) are considered to be innovative and cost-effective ways to make forest more valuable standing than cut. In response to climate change, international funding to support reductions in emissions needs to balance conservation and development. The Government of Vietnam is currently coordinating the design of a comprehensive benefit-distribution system, with the ambition to convert certified net emissions reductions into REDD+ revenue and distribute it to local partners in a transparent, equitable and costeffective manner. A pilot scheme is underway in Bac Kan province. With forest cover of 56.6% and a poverty rate of 36.6%, Bac Kan is among the most heavily forested and poorest provinces of Vietnam, making it a potential site for pioneering REDD+ schemes in the country.<br/>
Research questions were how to incorporate international, national and local stakeholders? investments into any distribution scheme; and how to sustain and manage an efficient, effective and equitable funding scheme for environmental services, including REDD+ revenues. Multiple data collection and analytical methods (including participatory approaches) were used to answer both research questions. Additionally, for the second question, we employed cost-benefit, opportunity cost and economic analyses.<br/>
Three key concepts formed the research frame for this paper: (1) benefit-distribution systems; (2) reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation plus conservation (REDD+); and (3) the broader concept of payments or rewards for ecosystem services; as well as lessons learned from existing, similar schemes.<br/>
This results shows that an appropriate benefit-sharing system for REDD+ revenues can be developed in such a way that meets international regulations as well as national and sub-national circumstances, particularly for the environmental services? providers who directly protect forests. Vietnam?s payments for forest environmental services? and integrated conservation schemes (where conservation and rural development are integrated) serve as a base for the development of a REDD+ benefit-distribution system.<br/>
We discuss ways of bundling such schemes with REDD+ ?service? payments and income streams from forestry and agroforestry ?goods? to provide short-term food- security/economic return and long-term environmental benefits. This combination is expected to provide sustainable incentives, but further effort is needed in the use of participatory methods and a ?bottom-up? approach to provide a strong base for an
effective and equitable REDD+ mechanism at landscape level.<br/>
Experience drawn from Vietnam, in general, and in Bac Kan, in particular, can be replicated and directly contribute to reducing carbon emissions globally.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>REDD+, Benefit sharing 16 system, Payment for environmental services, Equity, Transparency, Accountability, Effectiveness, Watershed management, Participatory</keywords>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<pubstatus>IN PRESS</pubstatus>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Do Trong H, Pham MT, van Noordwijk M and Minang PA. 2011. Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Journal of Land Use Policy. : P. 1-15.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2676</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>431</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0431-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Soil map classified by the soil classification system of the FAO-UNESCO</maintitle>
	<author>Dam Xuan Van, Dam Viet Bac and Le Thi Thanh Van</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Journal of science and technology</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Thai Nguyen University</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-5</mainpages>
	<abstract>Soil map of Vo Nhai district are oriented establishments to offer appropriately land use for each land unit that using of advantages as well as troubleshoot limitations of each land unit, and propose the suitable solution in the soil reform.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>Vietnamese</language>
	<citation>Dam XV, Dam VB and Le TT. 2011. Soil map classified by the soil classification system of the FAO-UNESCO. Journal of science and technology. : P. 1-5.</citation>
	<publicationid>2675</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>430</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0430-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Driving forces of land-use change in Ngoc Phai commune, Cho Don district, Bac Kan province, Vietnam (1990-2005)</maintitle>
	<author>Dam Viet Bac and Dam Xuan Van</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Journal of science and technology</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Thai Nguyen University</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-14</mainpages>
	<abstract>The study was conducted at the Ngoc Phai Commune, Cho Don District, Bac Kan Province, Vietnam.  The aimed to determine land-use changes (LUCs) and their driving forces for the last 15 years (1990-2005) of Doi Moi (renovation) era in the mountainous region of northern Vietnam. The proximate (direct) driving forces of land-use change include wood extraction and slash-and-burn, shift in agricultural expansion, cattle ranching, demographic factors, biological factors (soil degradation) and physical factors (slope, elevation and distance from location of LUCs to the main road).  In contrast, the underlying (indirect) driving forces of LUCs were Land Allocation Program 1992-1997, Five Million-Hectare Forest Restoration Program 1998-2010, Land Law 1993, Market-driven and Financial Aids in Forest Development. During the first period (1990-1998), the implementation of the forest allocation program became in allocated forest areas. Unfortunately, high rate of forest disturbance happened in the unallocated areas. During second period (1998-2005), after implementation of the land allocation program, market-driven and technological change created different effects on both gain of forest area and loss of forest areas. This period marked a strong economic transformation on agricultural production activities (shift in agricultural sector) and supports from government?s program. However, the forest protection and management seemed to be less effective compared to the first period, during land allocation implementation.</abstract>
	<keywords>driving forces, land use change, mountainous region, northern Vietnam</keywords>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dam VB and Dam XV. 2011. Driving forces of land-use change in Ngoc Phai commune, Cho Don district, Bac Kan province, Vietnam (1990-2005). Journal of science and technology. : P. 1-14.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2674</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>429</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0429-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Forest land-use change in Ngoc Phai commune, Cho Don district, Bac Kan province, Vietnam (1990-2005)</maintitle>
	<author>Dam Viet Bac and Dam Xuan Van</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Journal of science and technology</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Thai Nguyen University</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-6</mainpages>
	<abstract>The study was conducted at the Ngoc Phai Commune, Cho Don District, Bac Kan Province, Vietnam.  The aimed to determine land-use changes (LUCs) for the last 15 years (1990-2005) of Doi Moi (renovation) era in the mountainous region of northern Vietnam. For spatial data, the Geographic Information System (GIS) was applied as a tool for determining LUCs. Three land-use maps (1990, 1998 and 2005) were overlaid and grouped into two intervals (1990-1998 and 1998-2005).  Several thematic maps were created such as slope, elevation, drainage and road maps. Moreover, the study site was divided into 204-grid cells with 500 m x 500 m/cell or 25 ha/cell to identify and quantity the area and location of the land-use changes associated with the grid cell level. For the period 1990-1998, the total area of forest degradation was 109.31 ha.  This occurred at 15-35 slope, 500-700 masl and at a distance of 500-1000m from location of LUCs to the main road.  Forest restoration for the same time period was 108.30 ha mainly at 15-35 slope, 400-700 mal and at a distance of 100-250 m followed by 250-500 m and 500-750 m. For the period 1998-2005, forest degradation had a total area of 625.47 ha mainly at 15-35slope, 400-600 masl and at a distance of 250-500 m followed by 500-750 m and 750 ? 1000 m. Forest restoration for the same time period was 657.94 ha mainly at 15-35 slope, 400-700 mal and at a distance of 250-500 m followed by 500-750 m and 750-1000 m.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dam VB and Dam XV. 2011. Forest land-use change in Ngoc Phai commune, Cho Don district, Bac Kan province, Vietnam (1990-2005). Journal of science and technology. : P. 1-6.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2673</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>78</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0078-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Strategi usaha tani menghadapi fluktuasi harga</maintitle>
	<author>Rudi Hilmanto and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 10</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>13-15</mainpages>
	<abstract>Harga komoditi pertanian umumnya
menurun pada musim panen raya,
sehingga petani rentan mengalami
kerugian. Rendahnya harga jual
membuat petani berhadapan dengan
pilihan sulit, yaitu antara menjual
komoditi tetapi rugi karena harus
mengeluarkan biaya pemanenan dan
transportasi atau membiarkan komoditi
tidak dipanen. Di sisi lain, petani harus
memiliki uang tunai untuk modal
usaha tani pada musim tanam
berikutnya dan juga untuk memenuhi
kebutuhan hidup sehari-hari.
Sebaliknya, pada saat tertentu harga
komoditi bisa meningkat, karena
barang yang tersedia hanya sedikit.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Hilmanto R and Rahayu S. "Strategi usaha tani menghadapi fluktuasi harga. "Kiprah Agroforestri 10. Vol.4: 13-15]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2672</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>77</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0077-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Monitoring Cadangan Karbon oleh Masyarakat: Uji Coba di Propinsi Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia dan Nghe An, Vietnam</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu, Michael Poulsen, Yuyun Kurniawan and Hultera</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 10</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>10-12</mainpages>
	<abstract>Monitoring cadangan karbon
merupakan salah satu tahapan yang
harus dilakukan ketika mekanisme
pengurangan emisi dari deforestasi dan
degradasi hutan nantinya diterapkan.
Hasil dari monitoring ini harus bisa
dilaporkan dan diverifikasi dengan
menunjukkan tingkat akurasi dari
pengukurannya, baik dalam skala plot
maupun dalam skala bentang lahan.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Rahayu S, Poulsen M, Kurniawan Y and Hultera . "Monitoring Cadangan Karbon oleh Masyarakat: Uji Coba di Propinsi Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia dan Nghe An, Vietnam. "Kiprah Agroforestri 10. Vol.4: 10-12]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2671</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>76</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0076-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Bibit karet: penyokong kehidupan rumah tangga Ibu Sumariah</maintitle>
	<author>Ratna Akiefnawati</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 10</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>8-9</mainpages>
	<abstract>Melalui usaha pengembangan bibit
karet tersebut, keluarga Ibu Sumariah
mendapat perhatian dan kunjungan
dari masyarakat, baik nasional maupun
internasional. Petani-petani karet dari
Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darusalam
(NAD), Sumatra Barat, Riau dan
Lampung datang untuk belajar
penangkaran bibit karet unggul. Semua
pengunjung merasa puas dengan
penjelasan mengenai teori dan praktek
membuat pembibitan dengan cara
okulasi. Melihat kesuksesan tersebut,
para petani pengunjung berniat
mengikuti jejak usaha keluarga ini.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Akiefnawati R. "Bibit karet: penyokong kehidupan rumah tangga Ibu Sumariah. "Kiprah Agroforestri 10. Vol.4: 8-9]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2670</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>75</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0075-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Bensin Aren: Mungkinkah Menjadi Sumber Bahan Bakar Alternatif?</maintitle>
	<author>Endri Martini and James M Roshetko</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>5-7</mainpages>
	<abstract>Bensin yang saat ini kita gunakan merupakan hasil tambang dan berasal dari fosil yang sudah berproses ribuan tahun lamanya sehingga membentuk minyak bumi. Seperti barang tambang lainnya, minyak bumi merupakan sumberdaya alam yang tidak dapat
diperbaharui. Oleh karena itu, jumlahnya semakin berkurang sehingga harganya semakin mahal. Semakin mahal dan berfluktuasinya harga minyak mentah dunia menyebabkan banyak pihak mencari alternatif bahan bakar lain dengan tujuan untuk
mengurangi ketergantungan terhadap bahan bakar fosil seperti minyak bumi.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Martini E and Roshetko JM. "Bensin Aren: Mungkinkah Menjadi Sumber Bahan Bakar Alternatif?. "Kiprah Agroforestri. Vol.4: 5-7]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2669</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>74</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0074-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Menanam aren bukan mitos lagi</maintitle>
	<author>Max Harry Kaunang and Endri Martini</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 10</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>3-4</mainpages>
	<abstract>Aren dimanfaatkan oleh masyarakat sebagai sumber bahan baku gula, sapu lidi, ijuk, kolang-kaling, sagu dan minuman sudah sejak ratusan tahun yang lalu. Kontribusi aren bagi penghidupan masyarakat di Indonesiapun cukup nyata. Akan tetapi, seiring dengan bertambahnya penduduk dan semakin banyaknya alternatif sumber bahan baku gula selain aren, menyebabkan ketergantungan masyarakat terhadap pohon aren menurun. Pohonpohon aren yang sudah tuapun tidak diremajakan, sehingga mati dengan sendirinya. Hal ini mengakibatkan penurunan jumlah pohon aren di beberapa daerah. Jika dibiarkan terus-menerus, maka masyarakat yang menggantungkan hidupnya pada aren akan kehilangan penghidupan. Oleh karena itu perlu dilakukan program penanaman aren terutama di daerah-daerah sentra aren.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Kaunang MH and Martini E. "Menanam aren bukan mitos lagi. "Kiprah Agroforestri 10. Vol.4: 3-4]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2668</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>49</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0049-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 10</maintitle>
	<author>Max Harry Kaunang, Endri Martini, James M Roshetko, Ratna Akiefnawati, Subekti Rahayu, Michael Poulsen, Yuyun Kurniawan, Hultera and Rudi Hilmanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>1-16</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Seiring dengan bertambahnya jumlah penduduk Indonesia dan tingginya
tingkat kebutuhan masyarakat dari tahun ke tahun terus kita rasakan. Dimulai
dari berbagai jenis kebutuhan rumah tangga sampai dengan kebutuhan
pendukung lainnya. Masyarakat harus terus berusaha untuk mencukupi
kebutuhannya dengan berbagai cara, juga dengan mengandalkan sumber
daya alam disekitarnya.<br/>
Diawali dengan kisah masyarakat yang memanfaatkan aren sebagai bahan
baku untuk gula, sapu lidi, ijuk, kolang kaling juga sebagai minuman segar.
Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ini, masyarakat tergerak untuk mulai menanam
aren, meskipun masih dianggap tabu atau pamali. Mengapa demikian?<br/>
Selain pemanfaatan bahan baku di atas, aren juga berpeluang menjadi
sumber bahan bakar alternatif. Meskipun masih menjadi wacana, namun
pengembangan aren menjadi bensin merupakan suatu peluang.<br/>
Tidak hanya aren, bibit karetpun menjadi sumber daya alam yang mampu
memenuhi kebutuhan rumah tangga. Dari usaha pembibitan karet, seorang
ibu di Jambi berhasil menyekolahkan dua orang anaknya hingga lulus
perguruan tinggi.<br/>
Meskipun sumberdaya alam merupakan modal dasar untuk memenuhi
kebutuhan rumah tangga, namun harus dikelola dengan bijaksana agar dapat
dimanfaatkan secara berkelanjutan. Salah satu upaya pengelolaan sumber
daya adalah dengan mengurangi emisi dari deforestasi dan degradasi hutan.
Kegiatan ini tidak hanya dilakukan oleh para peneliti, tetapi mengikutsertakan
masyarakat dalam pemantauan sumber daya alam merupakan salah satu cara
untuk menumbuhkan kesadaran akan pentingnya pengelolaan yang baik.
Pelatihan pengukuran karbon di kalangan masyarakat menjadi langkah awal
pelibatan masyarakat dalam pemantauan pengelolaan sumber daya alam.<br/>
Tentunya, kesuksesan petani dalam mengelola sumber daya alam juga
dipengaruhi oleh kebijakan pemerintah dan strategi petani itu sendiri dalam
menghadapi fluktuasi harga komoditas.<br/>]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>-1</webdisplay>
	<citation>Kaunang MH, Martini E, Roshetko JM, Akiefnawati R, Rahayu S, Poulsen M, Kurniawan Y, Hultera  and Hilmanto R. 2011. Kiprah Agroforestri 10. In: Rahayu S and Tarigan J,eds. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2, GRP 3, GRP 4, GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2666</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>40</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BL0040-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>LUWES: Land use planning for Low Emission Development Strategy</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi, Andree Ekadinata, Gamma Galudra, Putra Agung and Feri Johana</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>47</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-58-3</descript3>
	<abstract>Land Use Planning for Low Emission Development Strategy (LUWES) is a platform for developing a multiple stakeholder decision-making process to establish land use plans for sustainable development, which can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from land-based activity while simultaneously maintaining economic growth. It can simulate emissions reduction scenarios within specific zones of a landscape, or across an entire landscape, in order to produce ex ante emissions reduction and opportunity cost forecasts. It also recognizes the impact of land use allocation policies and distribution on tenure and livelihood. LUWES can accommodate the integration process between multiple modalities of land-based emission reductions (such as REDD+; Locally Appropriate Mitigation Action (LAMA); and the voluntary carbon market) at the
planning stage across a common landscape.</abstract>
	<notes>Draft</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>-1</webdisplay>
	<citation>Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Galudra G, Agung P and Johana F. LUWES: Land use planning for Low Emission Development Strategy. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 47 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2665</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>428</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0428-12</callnumber>
	<maintitle>An Assessment of Potential Benefits to Smallholders of REDD+ Components in the Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Rodel D. Lasco, Florencia B Pulhin, Leonida Bugayong and Marlo Mendoza</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Annals of Tropical Research</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Visayas State University</publisher>
	<volume>33</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>31–48</mainpages>
	<abstract>Many sectors in the Philippines are looking at the potential of Reducing Emissions
from Deforestation and Forest Degradation-plus (REDD+) under the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to help finance forest protection and
rehabilitation in the country. However, one major problem is that there is little
information on the potential benefits the country can expect under REDD+.
Specifically, it is not known how each component activities of REDD+ can benefit
smallholder farmers. Thus, this paper assesses the potential benefits of activities under
REDD+ to smallholder farmers in the country. The key question is what the potential
of REDD+ in the Philippines is for improving the sequestration potential of the forest
sector and to serve as a form of supplemental livelihood for rural forest dwellers? The
main approach of the paper is to summarize what is known about: the historical
pattern of deforestation and degradation, the driving forces behind them, communitybased
forest management (CBFM), tenure and rights, and to analyze the implications
of Copenhagen and Cancun meetings for the Philippines. The main finding of the
study is that depending on which REDD+ activity is implemented, smallholder
farmers under CBFM areas would have varying roles and potential benefits.
Smallholder farmers will benefit the most from avoiding forest degradation and
enhancing of forest stocks activities because these activities pose the highest potential
carbon credits. Due to the rising total forest cover of the country, very few carbon
credits are expected from avoiding deforestation. This implies that government
policies and programs could focus on preparing local communities and institutions for
activities that decrease forest degradation and enhance carbon stocks. In addition,
there are many uncertainties and information gaps remaining. For example, the rate of
biomass degradation in Philippines forests and the drivers of forest degradation are
still unknown. The ability of government agencies to implement REDD+ is still
inadequate. A strong capacity building program is therefore essential.</abstract>
	<keywords>climate change mitigation, REDD, forest conservation, climate policy</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Bugayong L and Mendoza M. 2011. An Assessment of Potential Benefits to Smallholders of REDD+ Components in the Philippines. Annals of Tropical Research. 33(1):P. 31–48.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2664</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>427</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0427-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra, Meine van Noordwijk, S. Suyanto, Idris Sardi, Ujjwal P. Pradhan and Delia Catacutan</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Forestry Review</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The Commonwealth Forestry Association</publisher>
	<volume>13</volume>
	<edition>4</edition>
	<mainpages>431-441</mainpages>
	<abstract>In the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, expectations of payments for reducing carbon emissions shape the discourse over natural resource management as a means of influencing policy and exercising power. Different types of actors have their own choice of argument and interpretation of facts, rules and norms over resource use or conservation. This article examines the discursive strategies used by contestants in the
struggle over property rights in a failed development project (?ex-Mega Rice Area?) in Central Kalimantan and traces their changes and developments in the justification for policy influence in the face of REDD++ implementation. Shifting national policy priorities have affected the distribution of power that shapes the practice and use of forest peatland. The case study highlights the historical baggage of perceived injustice
between state and local communities and the contest between national and provincial government authorities that complicates the debate on current efforts to mitigate climate change by emission reduction.</abstract>
	<keywords>discourse, decentralization, REDD, land tenure, carbon rights</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Galudra G, van Noordwijk M, Suyanto S, Sardi I, Pradhan UP and Catacutan D. 2011. Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 13(4):P. 431-441.</citation>
	<publicationid>2663</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>426</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0426-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Analisis ekonomi sistem wanatani berbasis karet rakyat di Kalimantan Barat: implikasi bagi pengembangan karet</maintitle>
	<author>Yuliana Cahya Wulan, Abi Ismarrahman, Suseno Budidarsono and Laxman Joshi</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Warta Perkaretan</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Pusat Penelitian Karet</publisher>
	<volume>29</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>44-56</mainpages>
	<abstract>Analisis neraca usaha tani merupakan alat untuk memahami kinerja ekonomi dari suatu kegiatan pertanian, utamanya digunakan untuk menilai dampak dari intervensi teknologi, perubahan harga dan kebijakan. Analisis tersebut membantu memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang kelebihan dan kekurangan dari beragam kegiatan pertanian. Analisis usaha tani yang disajikan dalam makalah ini menggunakan perangkat lunak Olympe, yaitu perangkat lunak pemodelan usaha tani yang dikembangkan oleh Institut National ded la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD) dan Mediterranean Agronomic Institite of Montpellier (IAMM). Sebagai salah satu perangkat lunak pemodelan sistem usaha tani, olympe merupakan alat bantu yang cukup efisien dalam memberikan gambaran yang menyeluruh mengenai kondisi petani dan mengaitkannya dengan inovasi dan praktik teknis. Serangkaian analisis dapat dilakukan termasuk dampak ekonomis dari pemilihan suatu teknik, pengaruh ketidakteraturan iklim ataupun kondisi ekonomi, dan dampak lingkungan dari penggunaan lahan. Teknologi sistem wanatani berbasis karet (RAS) di Sanggau, Kalimantan barat, dikembangkan untuk diadaptasi oleh petani kecil yang modalnya terbatas. Hasil penelitian dan kajian menggunakan Olympe menunjukkan bahwa walaupun RAS membutuhkan modal yang lebih besar, profitabilitas lahan dan penerimaan petani (return to labor) memiliki nilai yang lebih besar bila dibandingkan dengan sistem karet tradisional petani. Penerimaan petani pada RAS bisa lebih tinggi dari penerimaan petani pada sistem usaha tani karet monokultur yang biasanya dilakukan secara intensif. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa teknologi RAS memiliki kelebihan dari segi ekonomi dan lingkungan dibandingkan sistem budidaya karet monokultur dan kelapa sawit monokultur.</abstract>
	<keywords>kinerja sistem usaha tani, neraca usaha tani, profitabilitas lahan, penerimaan petani, sistem wanatani berbasis karet (RAS), Kalimantan Barat</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Wulan YC, Ismarrahman A, Budidarsono S and Joshi L. 2010. Analisis ekonomi sistem wanatani berbasis karet rakyat di Kalimantan Barat: implikasi bagi pengembangan karet. Warta Perkaretan. 29(1):P. 44-56.</citation>
	<publicationid>2662</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>425</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0425-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agrobiodiversity pada sistem wanatani berbasis karet klonal</maintitle>
	<author>Janudianto, Subekti Rahayu, Budi, Laxman Joshi and Diah Wulandari</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Warta Perkaretan</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Pusat Penelitian Karet</publisher>
	<volume>29</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>7-14</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Tanaman karet telah lama dikenal di Indonesia dan berkembang luas di masyarakat dalam bentuk kebun karet campuran atau <i> agroforest</i> karet. <i>Agroforest</i> karet memiliki nilai lebih dari sisi keanekaragaman jenis tanaman (<i>agrobiodiversity</i>), karena tingginya keragaman spesies tanaman selain karet. <i>Rubber Agroforestry System (RAS)</i>, adalah teknologi yang mengintroduksikan bahan tanam karet klonal ke dalam <i>agroforest</i> karet. Teknologi RAS mampu mengakomodasi dan memberikan keleluasaan kepada petani untuk memperkaya kebunnya dengan memilih tanaman sela yang tumbuh dan ditanam di antara karet. RAS 1, salah satu tipe dari teknologi RAS yang setara dengan hutan karet rakyat dengan pengelolaan yang minimal dan penggunaan karet klonal terbukti mampu mempertahankan keanekaragaman jenis tanaman bila dibandingkan dengan monokultur. Perkayaan jenis tanaman di dalam sistem RAS sangat penting artinya bagi petani karena mampu memberikan nilai lebih dalam memnuhi kebutuhan hidupnya sehari-hari. Dilihat dari sisi <i>agrobiodiversity</i>, perkayaan jenis tanaman ini sangat penting perannya dalam menjaga kelestarian species-species tanaman tertentu.]]></abstract>
	<keywords><![CDATA[<i>Hevea brasiliensis, agroforest</i> karet, teknologi RAS, perkayaan jenis tanaman, <i>agrobiodiversity</i>]]></keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Janudianto, Rahayu S, Budi , Joshi L and Wulandari D. 2010. <i>Agrobiodiversity</i> pada sistem wanatani berbasis karet klonal. Warta Perkaretan. 29(1):P. 7-14.]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2661</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>278</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0278-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Towards a sustainable Southeast Asia: transforming lives and landscapes: highlights of 2010</maintitle>
	<author>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Program</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>17</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The World Agroforestry Centre has demonstrated its commitment to rigorous, relevant and development-oriented research since its establishment in Southeast Asia in 1993.<br/><br/>
In 2010, we continued to find innovative methods to bring to light issues of critical importance to poor farmers, development agencies, governments and donors.<br/><br/>
We have strategically focussed on global issues with local impact across the Southeast Asian region, ensuring that sustainability is at the forefront of all we do. With programs reaching across Asia Highlights World Agroforestry Centre Southeast Asia Program 2010
Ujjwal Pradhan, Regional Coordinator from Tibet to the Philippines and from the DPR Korea to Indonesia, and encompassing a range of activities from REDD to the red ape, from farmers' field schools to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Centre's scope is far-reaching and focussed on linking science with sustainability on the ground.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Program. Towards a sustainable Southeast Asia: transforming lives and landscapes: highlights of 2010. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 17 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2, GRP 3, GRP 4, GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2660</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>156</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0156-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal: Kalahan, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Grace B.Villamor, Nelson Pampolina, Reginald Forcadilla, Nonoy Bugtong, Jerome Alano, Delbert Rice, Tina Omas, Reymar Castillo and Dennis Pulan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper nr 106</edition>
	<totalpages>87</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[A research method called Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RaCSA) was conducted in Kalahan Forest Reserve (KFR), in Nueva Vizcaya Province, Northern Luzon, Philippines from August 2009 to January 2010. The aim of this activity was to support communities, such as the Ikalahan people, to establish basic data needed in negotiating with carbon markets in a costeffective and time-efficient manner. The appraisal involved a combination of methods and activities (for example, plot-level carbon measurement, spatial analysis of land-use cover, focus group discussions, key informant interviews and a review of the literature).<br/><br/>
There were several key results of the appraisal.<br/>
? <i>Land-use types and farming practices</i>. The majority of Ikalahan are swidden farmers practising traditional farming (for example, <i>pang-omis</i>, which involves integrating tree seedlings of species such as <i>Alnus</i> in the swidden farms). Five major land-use and land-cover types were identified and assessed, that is, agriculture, agroforest, grassland, reforestation and secondary forests.<br/>
?<i> Plot-level carbon stocks</i>. The estimated carbon stock of land-use systems in the KFR ranged 0.61?77.86 Mg/ha for aboveground carbon; and 21.8?67.4 Mg/ha for
belowground. Total (above- and belowground) carbon stock was estimated to range
54.31?151.13 Mg/ha. These results are low compared to other carbon assessments
conducted in the country.<br/>
? <i>Land-use and land-cover changes</i>. Land-use and land-cover changes within KFR between 1981 and 2001 were assessed. A decrease in forest, pine and agriculture
occurred while there was an increase in old pine and reforestation (for example,
mahogany). Carbon values from monitoring plots in 1994 and 2003 were used to
extrapolate the land-cover types of the 1981 and 2001 maps, respectively. Based on
the results, total carbon stock was approximately 375.8 Gg in 1994 and 452.1 Gg in
2003, that is, a 21% increase in 12 years.<br/>
? <i>Carbon emissions</i>. From the land-cover changes, we estimated that the KFR
sequestered carbon annually at an average of 0.5 Gg and that 1.4 Gg of carbon was
emitted each year over the period 1989 to 2001.<br/>
? The Kalahan Educational Foundation is the major stakeholder in the KFR. It has
established its own rules and regulations related to natural resources development
and has supported traditional farming practices and management strategies (for
example, their ?forest improvement technology?) to enhance the carbon stock within
the KFR. Currently, the Foundation is exploring the Clean Development Mechanism
market. Future options and their implications for the KFR are included in the paper.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>carbon stock assessment, farming practices, Ikalahan Ancestral Domain, land-use change</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Villamor GB, Pampolina N, Forcadilla R, Bugtong N, Alano J, Rice D, Omas T, Castillo R and Pulan D. 2010. Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal: Kalahan, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. Working paper nr 106Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 87 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2659</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>155</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0155-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Improving smallholders? rubber quality in Lubuk Beringin, Bungo district, Jambi province, Indonesia: an initial analysis of the financial and social benefits</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona, Ratna Akiefnawati, Rachman Pasha and S. Suyanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper nr 105</edition>
	<totalpages>11</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Smallholder rubber agroforestry is an economically and ecologically important agroforestry system in Jambi province, Sumatra, Indonesia. It contributes to rubber production nationally and is the main source of income for farmers with land of less than 5 hectare. The rubber agroforests act as buffer zones for national parks and help maintain local biodiversity, earning them the name ?jungle rubber?. Farmers cultivating these agroforests usually have lower financial profitability compared to those cultivating monoculture rubber and oil palm. The main reasons for this are the older ages of the agroforests, which causes low quantities of rubber latex, and the low quality of the rubber slabs owing to unsound harvest and postharvest procedures. In addition, the marketing system in Jambi?s villages depends on local traders, called <i>toke</i>, who mostly are not transparent about the real value of dry rubber content and the market price.<br/><br/>
Our hypothesis was that by providing incentives to ?jungle rubber? farmers they would be willing to conserve their rubber-tree gardens, delay or obviating their conversion to other land uses that provide less environmental services, such as monoculture rubber and oil palm.<br/><br/>
This report describes the different procedures employed in harvesting, post-harvesting and marketing in traditional and improved production systems. It highlights changes in the ratio of revenue and costs that were borne by farmers, through the deployment of technical innovations and collective action.<br/><br/>
Our results showed that improving rubber quality could increase farmers? incomes from
agroforestry systems when the dry rubber content (DRC) of their rubber slabs was more than 70% and they sold to agents who could transparently advise on the DRC and fairly determine the price according to the DRC level. When the DRC was lower than 70% and the price at minimum or average levels, selling rubber to <i>toke</i> was more profitable compared to selling direct to the factory.<br/><br/>
The activities that improved the rubber quality, which were coordinated by the World
Agroforestry Centre and partners, also increased farmers? knowledge and skills. These
included practical skills to enhance their livelihoods as well as the capability to organize
collective action, which, in the end was able to increase the efficiency of their smallholding rubber businesses. Moreover, neighbouring villages considered these activities useful and profitable, indicating a potential for expansion.<br/><br/>
Raising awareness about the ecological importance of rubber agroforestry was constantly needed in this area since there was no formal agreement that only farmers practising ?jungle rubber? agroforestry could enjoy access to innovative technologies and sell direct to factories. From the perspective of an environmental friendly rubber business, it is essential for rubber industries to recognise the environmental and economic value of rubber slabs coming from jungle rubber so that farmers are encouraged to maintain this ecosystem.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>rubber agroforestry, improving rubber quality, financial and social benefit analysis</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B, Akiefnawati R, Pasha R and Suyanto S. 2010. Improving smallholders’ rubber quality in Lubuk Beringin, Bungo district, Jambi province, Indonesia: an initial analysis of the financial and social benefits. Working Paper nr 105Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 11 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 2, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2658</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>154</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0154-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Komoditisasi atau koinvestasi jasa lingkungan? Skema Imbal Jasa Lingkungan Program Peduli Sungai di DAS Way Besai, Lampung, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Rachman Pasha, Tonni Asmawan, Beria Leimona, Erik Setiawan and Chandra Irawadi Wijaya</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ICRAF Working paper nr 104</edition>
	<totalpages>32</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) melalui proyek RUPES (Rewarding Upland Poor for
Environmental Services They Provide) melakukan riset aksi untuk menganalisis skema Imbal Jasa Lingkungan (IJL) yang menjembatani tujuan konservasi dan pengentasan kemiskinan dengan mengembangkan Program Peduli Sungai di DAS Way Besai, Lampung. Program ini dilaksanakan oleh petani di wilayah Sub DAS Air Ringkih sebagai penyedia jasa lingkungan dan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Air (PLTA) Besai di bawah naungan Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero) Sektor Bandar Lampung (PT.PLN-SBDL) sebagai pengguna jasa lingkungan. Dalam program ini masyarakat dilibatkan dalam kontrak IJL dengan target penurunan sedimentasi di DAS Ringkih sebesar 30% dalam waktu 1 tahun. Sebagai imbalannya, PT. PLN-SBDL akan memberikan penghargaan berupa mikrohidro senilai 20 juta rupiah. Kriteria penurunan 30% ini didasarkan pada hasil negosiasi antara ICRAF dan PT.PLN-SBDL, yang menghasilkan kesediaan (willingness to pay) dari pihak PT.PLN-SBDL untuk memberikan imbalan jasa lingkungan apabila syarat penurunan konsentrasi sedimen terpenuhi. Pengembangan Program Peduli Sungai dilakukan melalui 4 tahapan yang meliputi: (1) penentuan cakupan dan pengumpulan informasi (scoping); (2) analisis para pihak; (3) negosiasi; dan (4) implementasi dan pemantauan.<br/><br/>
Hasil akhir program menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat mampu menjalankan isi kontrak
kesepakatan dengan baik dengan persentase keberhasilan kegiatan sebesar 86 %. Hasil analisis perubahan konsentrasi sedimen menunjukkan penurunan sebesar 20% yang dilihat dari perbandingan antara nilai slope baseline awal sebesar 299.08 dengan nilai slope pada akhir tahun sebesar 239.27. Dengan hasil tersebut maka sebenarnya masyarakat tidak berhasil mencapai target penurunan sedimentasi sebesar 30% untuk mendapatkan kompensasi/penghargaan berupa mikrohidro yang dijanjikan. Namun demikian, pihak PT.PLN-SBDL sangat menghargai upaya masyarakat untuk menurunkan konsentrasi sedimen di sungai Air Ringkih sehingga memutuskan untuk tetap memberikan mikrohidro. Sikap PT.PLN-SBDL ini memberikan dampak yang besar pada peningkatan peran masyarakat untuk menjaga lingkungannya terutama daerah aliran sungai. Hal inilah yang menjadi tujuan utama dari suatu mekanisme imbal jasa lingkungan. Masyarakat di daerah hulu tetap melanjutkan pengelolaan lahan mereka dengan menerapkan teknik konservasi tanah dan air sehingga sumberdaya alam tetap terjaga dan penurunan laju sedimentasi bisa tercapai.<br/><br/>
Contoh kasus Program Peduli Sungai tersebut menunjukkan terjadinya pergeseran paradigma IJL, yaitu dari paradigma ?komoditisasi jasa lingkungan? yang berfokus pada pasar atau jual beli jasa lingkungan menjadi paradigma ?koinvestasi dalam pelestarian lansekap? yang berfokus pada investasi bersama dalam menjaga kelestarian DAS. Secara praktis, ?koinvestasi? dalam implementasi IJL mendorong partisipasi seluruh pemangku kepentingan, termasuk masyarakat hulu dan hilir, pemerintah dan pihak swasta, untuk mempertimbangkan efisiensi dan kesetaraan, membangun kepercayaan parapihak, mengutamakan transparansi dan kebersamaan dalam mengelola DAS secara berkelanjutan]]></abstract>
	<keywords>pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai, pendekatan partisipatif, program peduli sungai, pembayaran jasa lingkungan, koinvestasi pelestarian lansekap</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Pasha R, Asmawan T, Leimona B, Setiawan E and Wijaya CI. 2010. Komoditisasi atau koinvestasi jasa lingkungan? Skema Imbal Jasa Lingkungan Program Peduli Sungai di DAS Way Besai, Lampung, Indonesia. ICRAF Working paper nr 104Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 32 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2657</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>424</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0424-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)</maintitle>
	<author>William C. Clark, Thomas P Tomich, Meine van Noordwijk, David Guston, Delia Catacutan, Nancy M. Dickson and Elizabeth McNie</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS)</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The National Academy of Sciences of the USA</publisher>
	<abstract>Previous research on the determinants of effectiveness in knowledge systems seeking to support sustainable development has highlighted the importance of ?boundary work? through which research communities organize their relations with new science, other sources of knowledge, and the worlds of action and policymaking. A growing body of scholarship postulates specific attributes of boundary work that promote used and useful research. These propositions, however, are largely based on the experience of a few industrialized countries. We report here on an effort to evaluate their relevance for efforts to harness science in support of sustainability in the developing world. We carried out a multicountry comparative analysis of natural resource management programs conducted under the auspices of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. We discovered six distinctive kinds of boundary work contributing to the successes of those programs?a greater variety than has been documented in previous studies. We argue that these different kinds of boundary work can be understood as a dual response to the different uses for which the results of specific research programs are intended, and the different sources of knowledge drawn on by those programs. We show that these distinctive kinds of boundary work require distinctive strategies to organize them effectively. Especially important are arrangements regarding participation of stakeholders, accountability in governance, and the use of ?boundary objects.? We conclude that improving the ability of research programs to produce useful knowledge for sustainable development will require both greater and differentiated support for multiple forms of boundary work.</abstract>
	<notes>doi/10.1073/pnas.0900231108</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, Dickson NM and McNie E. 2011. Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). : P. .</citation>
	<publicationid>2656</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>277</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0277-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Recognising biodiversity in rubber plantations</maintitle>
	<author>Hesti L. Tata, Elok Mulyoutami, Zuraidah Said, Harti Ningsih, Asep Ayat and Pandam Nugroho Prasetyo</author>
	<editor>Hesti L. Tata</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>95</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Biological diversity (biodiversity) is a description of the number, variety and variability of living organisms, which can be described in term of genes, species and ecosystems. As an ecosystem, tropical rainforest is characterised by high diversity and species richness. In Indonesia, owing to high deforestation, many forest areas, particularly in Sumatra, are declining rapidly. Large forest areas were lost due to interactions between the granting of logging concessions, overcapacity in the pulp and paper industry, increased accessibility to formerly remote areas, spontaneous and state-sponsored migration and profitable opportunities for tree-crop plantations, such as rubber
and oil palm. In North Sumatra alone, rubber and oil palm were introduced during the colonial era in the early 1990s. Rubber plantation estates in Dolok Merangir have a long history with the first one being established in 1916 as the site of Goodyear?s first rubber plantation. In 2005, the Dolok Merangir and Aek Tarum rubber plantations were sold to Bridgestone, a tire company based in Japan.<br/><br/>
Deforestation and transformation of forest cover to other land uses results in a decline in biodiversity. Our study focused on a biodiversity survey on land-cover change in the Dolok Merangir and Aek Tarum rubber plantation areas over the period 1970 to 2010, and the diversity and species composition of vegetation in the rubber plantations compared with rubber smallholder and forest areas surrounding the plantations. Animal diversity studies of birds and bats that play important roles in the ecosystem as pollinators, seed dispersal agents and biological controllers were also undertaken in those three habitats at two sites.<br/><br/>
Furthermore, humans as an integral component in the ecosystems play the most important role with a direct influence over land-cover change. The perceptions of local people and their understanding of local activities and their effects on biodiversity were also studied in the research. The overall objective of the research was to assess biodiversity data from the study sites and to make recommendations on how to improve biodiversity in the plantations on the Bridgestone Sumatra Rubber Estate (PT BSRE).]]></abstract>
	<notes>Bridgestone report</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Tata HL, Mulyoutami E, Said Z, Ningsih H, Ayat A and Prasetyo PN. Recognising biodiversity in rubber plantations. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 95 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2655</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>35</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0035-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Merencanakan pembangunan rendah emisi di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat Provinsi Jambi</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Putra Agung, Feri Johana, Gamma Galudra, A Palloge, G Usman and N Aini</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief No. 18</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract>Tanjung Jabung Barat (Tanjabar) adalah salah satu kabupaten di propinsi Jambi yang memiliki tingkat emisi gas rumah kaca, akibat perubahan penggunaan lahan, yang cukup tinggi dibandingkan kabupaten lain di Propinsi Jambi. Pada tahun 2005-2009, emisi rata-rata di kabupaten ini mencapai 9,66 ton CO2,/(ha.thn). Penyebab utama emisi gas rumah kaca di kabupaten ini adalah konversi hutan bekas tebangan menjadi karet dan perkebunan kelapa sawit. Kebijakan pembangunan di tingkat nasional juga sangat berpengaruh terhadap laju emisi gas rumah kaca,misalnya saja percepatan pembangunan Hutan Tanaman Industri (HTI) yang pada kenyataan merupakan bentuk pemanfaatan lahan dominan di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Agung P, Johana F, Galudra G, Palloge A, Usman G and Aini N. 2011. Merencanakan pembangunan rendah emisi di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat Provinsi Jambi. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2654</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>34</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0034-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Merencanakan pembangunan rendah emisi di Kabupaten Merangin Provinsi Jambi</maintitle>
	<author>Feri Johana, Putra Agung, Gamma Galudra, Andree Ekadinata, D Fadila, S Bahri and Erwinsyah</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief No 17</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract>Merangin adalah salah satu kabupaten di Provinsi Jambi dengan luas wilayah 7,679 km atau sekitar 15% dari luas wilayah provinsi (BPS Merangin, 2009). Merangin memiliki tingkat emisi gas rumah kaca akibat perubahan penggunaan lahan cukup tinggi dibandingkan kabupaten lain di Propinsi Jambi. Pada tahun 2005-2010, emisi rata-rata di kabupaten ini mencapai 16,62 ton CO2 eq./(ha.th). Penyebab utama emisi gas rumah kaca di kabupaten ini adalah penurunan kualitas hutan dari hutan primer menjadi hutansekunder, hutan sekunder kerapatan tnggi menjadi hutan sekunder kerapatan rendah dan karet campur.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Johana F, Agung P, Galudra G, Ekadinata A, Fadila D, Bahri S and Erwinsyah . 2011. Merencanakan pembangunan rendah emisi di Kabupaten Merangin Provinsi Jambi. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2653</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>33</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0033-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Recognizing traditional tree tenure as part of conservation and REDD+ strategy: Feasibility study for a buffer zone between a wildlife reserve and the Lamandau river in Indonesia's REDD+ Pilot Province</maintitle>
	<author>Janudianto, Elok Mulyoutami, Laxman Joshi, D. Andrew Wardell and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB Policy Brief No. 22</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD ) should
focus on places where such emissions occur. Protected Areas (PAs) are, in
theory, protected and hence, should have no emissions associated with
land use/land cover change. In practice protection is incomplete. Can PAs
+ be included in REDD schemes? Can 'paper parks' be included that exist on
paper rather than in reality? How concrete should threats be before we call
carbon (C) protection 'additional'? The dilemma may be more manageable if
+ protected areas are included in a broader landscape approach to REDD .
+ Some REDD project proponents currently focus on 'buffer zones' where
protection is incomplete, but biodiversity co-benefits of additional C
+ protection can be large. The results of a REDD feasibility appraisal in an
area surrounding the Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve in Central
+ Kalimantan, Indonesia's REDD pilot province illustrate the challenges of
finding synergies between sustaining livelihoods for local communities,
protecting orangutans and globally appropriate mitigation actions.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Janudianto, Mulyoutami E, Joshi L, Wardell DA and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Recognizing traditional tree tenure as part of conservation and REDD+ strategy: Feasibility study for a buffer zone between a wildlife reserve and the Lamandau river in Indonesia's REDD+ Pilot Province. Nairobi, Kenya. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 2, GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2652</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>51</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0051-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pengukuran Cadangan Karbon Tanah Gambut. Petunjuk Praktis.</maintitle>
	<author>Fahmuddin Agus, Kurniatun Hairiah and Anny Mulyani</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>58</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-57-6</descript3>
	<abstract>Lahan gambut merupakan penyimpan karbon dalam jumlah sangat
besar. Karbon yang terkandung di dalam tanah gambut bersifat
tidak stabil. Dalam keadaan hutan alam karbon tersebut bertahan
dalam bentuk bahan organik, namun apabila hutan gambut dibuka
dan didrainase maka karbon yang disimpannya akan mudah
terdekomposisi dan menghasilkan CO2; salah satu gas rumah kaca
terpenting. Selain itu drainase lahan gambut yang berlebihan
menyebkan lahan gambut rentan terhadap kebakaran. Proses
dekomposisi, konsolidasi (pemadatan) dan kebakaran meyebabkan
gambut akan mengalami penyusutan (subsidence) dan kehilangan
berbagai fungsinya dalam menyangga lahan sekitarnya dari kebanjiran
dan kekeringan.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Agus F, Hairiah K and Mulyani A. 2011. Pengukuran Cadangan Karbon Tanah Gambut. Petunjuk Praktis.. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 58 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2651</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>308</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0308-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Cadangan karbon sebagai penyedia jasa lingkungan dan sumber pendapatan masyarakat</maintitle>
	<author>Hesti L. Tata, Ni'matul Khasanah and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Harmonisasi kawasan konservasi sebagai penghela ekonomi kehutanan berbasis taman nasional</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Pusat Riset Perubahan Iklim, Unicersitas Indonesia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Jakarta, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<pubsdate>2011-03-23 00:00:00</pubsdate>
	<mainpages>93-106</mainpages>
	<abstract>Alam Indonesia yang kaya memberikan sumbangan yang besar bagi kehidupan. Berbagai sumber daya alam, baik berupa materi dan jasa, dimanfaatkan bagi kelangsungan hidup manusia. Oleh karena itu, kelangsungan hidup manusia sangat tergantung akan kelestarian keanekaragaman hayati. Dalam suatu ekosistem terjadi interaksi yang kompleks antara pojon, binatang, komuniats mikroorganisme dan benda tak hidup sebagai sebuah unit, serta manusia menjadi bagian integral di dalamnya.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Tata HL, Khasanah N and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Cadangan karbon sebagai penyedia jasa lingkungan dan sumber pendapatan masyarakat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Harmonisasi kawasan konservasi sebagai penghela ekonomi kehutanan berbasis taman nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia. Pusat Riset Perubahan Iklim, Unicersitas Indonesia. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2650</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>321</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0321-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Supporting multifunctionality through realistic, conditional and voluntary actions to enhance trees as sources of environmental services</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona, Meine van Noordwijk, Laxman Joshi, Delia Catacutan, Thomas Yatich, Johannes Dietz, Hosea Mwangi, John Mwangi Gathenya, Catherine Muthuri, Fergus Sinclair, Sanjeeb Bhattarai, Leah Onyango, S. Suyanto, Antoine Kalinganire, Qureish Noordin...</author>
	<editor>Meine van Noordwijk, Hoang Minh Ha, Henry Neufeldt, Ingrid Oborn and Thomas Yatich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>44</totalpages>
	<mainpages>79-121</mainpages>
	<abstract>In this final section we will discuss the interrelationships among people, trees and local climate (the inner circle of the diagram), and all the surrounding issues at national and international levels, and then relate our current understanding and knowledge of these interrelations to opportunities for action. We pick up the thread from Chapter D and return to the issue of multifunctionality of landscapes and the way human drivers and institutions that influence the landscape can themselves be modified.</abstract>
	<notes>ISBN: 978-979-3198-56-9</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B, van Noordwijk M, Joshi L, Catacutan D, Yatich T, Dietz J, Mwangi H, Gathenya JM, Muthuri C, Sinclair F, Bhattarai S, Onyango L, Suyanto S, Kalinganire A, Noordin Q, Bayala J, Gebrekirstos A, Tscherning K and Duque-Piñon C. 2011. Supporting multifunctionality through realistic, conditional and voluntary actions to enhance trees as sources of environmental services. In: van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Oborn I and Yatich T,eds. How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). P. 79-121.</citation>
	<publicationid>2649</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>320</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0320-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Trees as providers of environmental services in multifunctional landscapes are vulnerable to climate change</maintitle>
	<author>Ramni Jamnadass, Aster Gebrekirstos, Henry Neufeldt, Catherine Muthuri, Ian Dawson, Roeland Kindt, Ylva Nyberg, Johannes Dietz, Jules Bayala, Shem Kuyah, Chin K Ong, Carmen Sotelo Montes, John Weber, Kurniatun Hairiah and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<editor>Meine van Noordwijk, Hoang Minh Ha, Henry Neufeldt, Ingrid Oborn and Thomas Yatich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>16</totalpages>
	<mainpages>63-77</mainpages>
	<abstract>In this section we provide a more in-depth look at the role trees play in the provision of goods and services in multifunctional landscapes. Tree growth is, however, vulnerable to climate variability, depending on the physiological properties of the tree and characteristics of the site. A further quantification of climate variability and climate change is needed to advise on what types of trees can be grown where, to be ready for the likely local climate-change during their lifetime. This leads to a discussion of the two-way relationship between climate change adaptation and rewards for environmental services in multifunctional landscapes as a way to reduce vulnerability to climate change.</abstract>
	<notes>ISBN: 978-979-3198-56-9</notes>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Jamnadass R, Gebrekirstos A, Neufeldt H, Muthuri C, Dawson I, Kindt R, Nyberg Y, Dietz J, Bayala J, Kuyah S, Ong CK, Montes C, Weber J, Hairiah K and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Trees as providers of environmental services in multifunctional landscapes are vulnerable to climate change. In: van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Oborn I and Yatich T,eds. How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). P. 63-77.</citation>
	<publicationid>2648</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>319</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0319-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rural livelihoods in changing, multifunctional landscapes</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Leah Onyango, Antoine Kalinganire, Laxman Joshi, Hoang Minh Ha, Nestry Ndichu and Ramni Jamnadass</author>
	<editor>Meine van Noordwijk, Hoang Minh Ha, Henry Neufeldt, Ingrid Oborn and Thomas Yatich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>26</totalpages>
	<mainpages>37-61</mainpages>
	<abstract>The main argument in this section is that changing (or 'transforming') landscapes and lives are mutually dependent on each other, as they are closely linked in time and space. Within the landscape continuum, the roles of landscape elements in supplying goods and services to local livelihoods, however, shift with the stage of development and substitution of traded and imported goods and services for those provided locally and potentially used as sources of income.</abstract>
	<notes>ISBN: 978-979-3198-56-9</notes>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Onyango L, Kalinganire A, Joshi L, Hoang MH, Ndichu N and Jamnadass R. 2011. Rural livelihoods in changing, multifunctional landscapes. In: van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Oborn I and Yatich T,eds. How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). P. 37-61.</citation>
	<publicationid>2647</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>318</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0318-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Climate change, climate variability and adaptation options</maintitle>
	<author>Henry Neufeldt, Isabel van de Sand, Johannes Dietz, Hoang Minh Ha, Thomas Yatich, Rodel D. Lasco and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<editor>Meine van Noordwijk, Hoang Minh Ha, Henry Neufeldt, Ingrid Oborn and Thomas Yatich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>22</totalpages>
	<mainpages>15-35</mainpages>
	<abstract>This section introduces some basic concepts surrounding the climate system, climate change and climate variability. We will provide some insights into the challenges of climate modelling and what the inherent uncertainty really means for us, before exploring the way adaptation has so far been discussed and institutionalised</abstract>
	<notes>ISBN: 978-979-3198-56-9</notes>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Neufeldt H, van de Sand I, Dietz J, Hoang MH, Yatich T, Lasco RD and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Climate change, climate variability and adaptation options. In: van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Oborn I and Yatich T,eds. How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). P. 15-35.</citation>
	<publicationid>2646</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>423</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0423-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr.) for livelihoods and biodiversity conservation in the orangutan habitat of Batang Toru, North Sumatra, Indonesia: mixed prospects for domestication</maintitle>
	<author>Endri Martini, James M Roshetko, Meine van Noordwijk, Arif Rahmanulloh, Elok Mulyoutami, Laxman Joshi and Suseno Budidarsono</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Agroforestry Systems</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer Science+Business Media B.V.</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-17</mainpages>
	<abstract>Domestication of desirable forest resources
in agroforestry is expected to contribute to community
based forest conservation efforts, but there may be an
optimum level of domestication in this respect. Aren or
sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr.) is a
multipurpose tree that provides livelihoods for local
people and food for other biota in the landscape.
However, its domestication is still limited in many
places, such as in Batang Toru Forest Block, an area of
high conservation value, including habitat for the
Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). Options for aren
management were prioritized as part of a landscapescale
conservation study by comparing domestication
levels in the area. Data on economic indicators and
ecological knowledge were gathered through interviews
with key farmers, focus groups and transect
walks. Four representative villages were selected for
the study, that is, (i) two villages with no domestication
of aren; and (ii) two villages with aren cultivation in
rubber-based land-use systems. Costbenefit analyses
suggested that in a rich biodiversity area, such as
Batang Toru, although aren was one of the sources of
local livelihoods, additional investment for domestication
beyond cultivation was not an option considered by
farmers. Farmers still perceived wildlife as an efficient
mode of aren regeneration, supported by the coexistence
of people and other biota in the area. It appears the
value of aren for local people?s livelihoods and
conservation can be enhanced by increasing its stocking
density. There is also scope for improving market
access and share of end-user value received by farmers.</abstract>
	<keywords>Natural regeneration, Enrichment, Planting, Aren</keywords>
	<notes>DOI 10.1007/s10457-011-9441-0</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Martini E, Roshetko JM, van Noordwijk M, Rahmanulloh A, Mulyoutami E, Joshi L and Budidarsono S. 2011. Sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb) Merr.) for livelihoods and biodiversity conservation in the orangutan habitat of Batang Toru, North Sumatra, Indonesia: mixed prospects for domestication. Agroforestry Systems. : P. 1-17.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 3</grp>
	<publicationid>2645</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>50</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0050-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Measuring Carbon Stocks Across Land Use Systems: A Manual</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah, Sonya Dewi, Fahmuddin Agus, Sandra J.Velarde, Andree Ekadinata, Subekti Rahayu and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>154</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-55-2</descript3>
	<abstract>Carbon stocks of forests, agroforestry systems and other land uses have become of interest to many stakeholders in the global debate on greenhouse gas emissions and efforts to reduce such emissions. This manual evolved from efforts in the early 1990s when the Alternative to Slash and Burn (ASB) program started efforts to collect consistent data across the humid tropics. The Manual is consistent with the Good Practice Guideline (GPG) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that is to be used for national accounting of carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emissions. The first part discusses reasons for measurement of carbon stocks across land 
use systems, at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Part 2 proved a 7-step rapid carbon appraisal process (RaCSA), combining analysis of remote sensing imagery and a nested-design for sampling trees, understorey, litter and other necromass, roots and soil organic matter. Allometric relationships between tree dimater and total biomass are discussed in relation to wood density. A case study describes all steps for the Kali Konto watershed in East Java (Indonesia)</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Hairiah K, Dewi S, Agus F, Velarde SJ, Ekadinata A, Rahayu S and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Measuring Carbon Stocks Across Land Use Systems: A Manual. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 154 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2644</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>39</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BL0039-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Perubahan Pola Perladangan: Pergeseran persepsi mengenai para peladang di Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Elok Mulyoutami, Meine van Noordwijk, Niken Sakuntaladewi and Fahmuddin Agus</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>101</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-54-5</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Temuan dari serangkaian kegiatan penelitian di bawah program
?<i>Alternatives to Slash and Burn</i>? atau ASB yang dilakukan lima belas
tahun lampau, menunjukkan ?tebas dan bakar? sebagai metoda
pembersihan lahan tidak hanya dilakukan masyarakat peladang
namun juga oleh para transmigran, perkebunan skala besar
serta dalam industri kayu. Aktivitas tebas dan bakar tidaklah
selalu dikonotasikan sebagai perladangan berpindah tradisional.
Program ASB pun kemudian berkembang menjadi studi perubahan
penggunaan lahan yang komprehensif, serta tetap memperhatikan
konsekuensi sosial, lingkungan dan ekonomi. ASB melakukan
analisis ?trade off? untuk menyelaraskan lingkungan dengan program
pembangunan.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Mulyoutami E, van Noordwijk M, Sakuntaladewi N and Agus F. Perubahan Pola Perladangan: Pergeseran persepsi mengenai para peladang di Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 101 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2643</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>422</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0422-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>China?s new forests aren?t as green as they seem</maintitle>
	<author>Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Nature</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Nature Publishing Group</publisher>
	<volume>477</volume>
	<mainpages>371</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[In the United Nations? 2011 International Year of Forests, China is
heralded as a superstar. Almost single-handedly, the country has
halted long-term forest loss across Asia, and even turned it into
a net gain. Since the 1990s, China has planted more than 4 million
hectares of new forest each year.<br/>
Earlier this month, President Hu Jintao pledged that China would
do even more. He told a meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Forum in Beijing that the nation would increase its total area
of forest by 40 million hectares over the next decade. China, he said, is
ready to make new contributions to green, sustainable growth.]]></abstract>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Xu Jianchu. 2011. China’s new forests aren’t as green as they seem. Nature. 477: P. 371.</citation>
	<publicationid>2642</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>73</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0073-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>An ecomonic-ecological mosaic</maintitle>
	<author>Ujjwal P. Pradhan</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Tempo</secondtitle>
	<volume>V</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<pubsdate>2011-10-12 00:00:00</pubsdate>
	<mainpages>10</mainpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Pradhan UP. "An ecomonic-ecological mosaic. "Tempo. Vol.V12 Okt 2011: 10]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2641</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>72</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0072-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Climate smart rural development</maintitle>
	<author>Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Tempo</secondtitle>
	<volume>V</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<pubsdate>2011-10-12 00:00:00</pubsdate>
	<mainpages>8-9</mainpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Lasco RD. "Climate smart rural development. "Tempo. Vol.V12 Okt 2011: 8-9]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2640</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>71</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0071-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agroforestry around ASEAN</maintitle>
	<author>TUL-SEA Project</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Tempo</secondtitle>
	<volume>V</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<pubsdate>2011-10-12 00:00:00</pubsdate>
	<mainpages>6-7</mainpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[TUL-SEA Project. "Agroforestry around ASEAN. "Tempo. Vol.V12 Okt 2011: 6-7]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2639</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>70</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0070-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agroforetsry: A new green buzzword?</maintitle>
	<author>Yuli Ismartono</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Tempo</secondtitle>
	<volume>V</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<pubsdate>2011-10-12 00:00:00</pubsdate>
	<mainpages>5</mainpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Ismartono Y. "Agroforetsry: A new green buzzword?. "Tempo. Vol.V12 Okt 2011: 5]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2638</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>420</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0420-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Influence of coastal vegetation on the 2004 tsunami wave impact in west Aceh</maintitle>
	<author>Juan Carlos Laso Bayas, Carsten Marohn, Gerd Dercon, Sonya Dewi, Hans Peter Piepho, Laxman Joshi, Meine van Noordwijk and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The National Academy of Sciences of the USA</publisher>
	<mainpages>18612 - 18617</mainpages>
	<abstract>In a tsunami event human casualties and infrastructure damage are determined predominantly by seaquake intensity and offshore properties. On land, wave energy is attenuated by gravitation (elevation) and friction (land cover). Tree belts have been promoted as ?bioshields? against wave impact. However, given the lack of quantitative evidence of their performance in such extreme events, tree belts have been criticized for creating a false sense of security. This study used 180 transects perpendicular to over 100 km on the west coast of Aceh, Indonesia to analyze the influence of coastal
vegetation, particularly cultivated trees, on the impact of the 2004 tsunami. Satellite imagery; land cover maps; land use characteristics; stem diameter, height, and planting density; and a literature review were used to develop a land cover roughness coefficient
accounting for the resistance offered by different land uses to the wave advance. Applying a spatial generalized linear mixed model, we found that while distance to coast was the dominant determinant of impact (casualties and infrastructure damage), the existing coastal vegetation in front of settlements also significantly reduced casualties by an average of 5%. In contrast, dense vegetation behind villages endangered human lives and increased structural damage. Debris carried by the backwash may have contributed to these dissimilar effects of land cover. For sustainable and effective
coastal risk management, location of settlements is essential, while the protective potential of coastal vegetation, as determined by its spatial arrangement, should be regarded as an important livelihood provider rather than just as a bioshield.</abstract>
	<keywords>glimmix, tsunami mitigation, vegetation effects, food security</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Bayas JC, Marohn C, Dercon G, Dewi S, Piepho HP, Joshi L, van Noordwijk M and Cadisch G. 2011. Influence of coastal vegetation on the 2004 tsunami wave impact in west Aceh. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. : P. 18612 - 18617.</citation>
	<publicationid>2637</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>149</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0149-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes</maintitle>
	<editor>Meine van Noordwijk, Hoang Minh Ha, Henry Neufeldt, Ingrid Oborn and Thomas Yatich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>133</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-56-9</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Climate changes, especially increased variability, affect landscapes, human livelihoods and trees in many ways. They are the consequence of a wider set of global change issues, including population increase, more consumption per capita and trade globalisation. Both people and trees can adapt to change at various time scales, but the current rate of change implies that pro-active planning as part of integrated rural development is needed. Lessons learnt from 'best practices' of rural development and natural resources management in the tropics suggest development strategies that can be shared more widely in the field and relevant research to support their refinement. In
the current climate-change debates, 'trees' have received surprisingly little attention, while the issues of sustainable forest management are only beginning to appear on the aenda. Where national adaptation plans are made for developing countries, trees and forests both deserve full attention. Jointly, they are part of 'multifunctional landscapes'.<br/>
This book focuses on the relationship between climate-change adaptation, rural development and the roles of trees and agroforestry. Rewards' schemes for environmental services (RES) in multifunctional landscapes, which provide incentives for maintaining or restoring multifunctionality, will contribute to a likely reduction in vulnerability to climate change. Rewards may well be an efficient and fair way of investing international funds in climate-change adaptation. The voluntary, conditional and pro-poor aspects of RES will also help to bring the voice of grassroots stakeholders into international and national decision-making processes on how to deal with climate change. That can ensure realism and efficiency in climate-change adaptation, which is yet another strand to be integrated in rural development programs. The argument for such an approach is built on the underlying concepts of climate change, rural livelihoods and multifunctionality of landscapes, as well as the specific roles of trees and farmers as providers of environmental services in agricultural landscapes. However, trees themselves are vulnerable to climate change and co-adaptation is needed and is possible.<br/>
The emerging experience and findings of on-going action research in Asian and African countries on climate change, agroforestry and rewards or payments for environmental services (RES/PES) are introduced in the book to highlight these arguments. The experience that RES/PES can create effective, efficient and fair incentives for enhancement of the environment is used to explore how climate-change adaptation funds could be channelled to support local initiatives, within realistic, conditional, voluntary and pro-poor incentive mechanisms.<br/>
Priority areas for action and hypotheses for further research are identified, involving the roles of trees in modifying micro- and mesoclimates, refining the operational rules for use of climatechange adaptation funds, institutional expansion of the (already tested) rapid appraisal methods that acknowledge multiple knowledge systems and perceptions, analysing the risks to local livelihoods in ecological and environmental economics frameworks posed by climate change and trade globalisation and new approaches to integrate the space-time dynamics of landscape functions in socio-ecological-political-economy systems.]]></abstract>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>2011. How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. Nairobi, Kenya. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). 133 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2636</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>419</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0419-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Memahami konflik tenurial melalui pendekatan sejarah: Studi kasus di Lebak, Banten</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Jurnal Keadilan</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Alumni Hukum Universitas Indonesia</publisher>
	<volume>5</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>1-9</mainpages>
	<abstract>Konflik tenurial yang terjadi di berbagai daerah khususnya yang berkaitan dengan tanah dan hutan terjadi akibat adanya perubahan kebijakan pemerintah dari waktu ke waktu. Hal ini perlu menjadi perhatian kita bersama karena pada dasarnya masyarakat daerah memerlukan kepastian hukum tentang tanah dan hutan. Hal ini dikarenakan tanah dan harta kita adalah bagian dari hidup rakyat banyak di daerah</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Galudra G. 2011. Memahami konflik tenurial melalui pendekatan sejarah: Studi kasus di Lebak, Banten. Jurnal Keadilan. 5(2):P. 1-9.</citation>
	<publicationid>2632</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>166</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0166-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Fairly efficient and efficiently fair: success factors and constraints in payment and reward for environmental schemes in Asia</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Wageningen University and Research</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Wageningen, the Netherlands</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>176</totalpages>
	<descript1>Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment</descript1>
	<descript2>PhD</descript2>
	<abstract>Payment for environmental service (PES) is strictly defined as a market-based environmental policy instrument to achieve environmental protection in the most efficient way. However, an increasing body of literature shows that the prescriptive conceptualization of PES cannot be easily generalized and implemented in practice and the commodification of ecosystem services is problematic. To investigate the underlying causes, this PhD study combines a quantitative and qualitative research approach using case studies in Indonesia, the Philippines and Nepal. The empirical observations on emerging PES-mechanisms in the Asian case studies show that interdependency of fairness and efficiency should be the main consideration in designing and implementing a PES scheme in developing countries. Neither fairness nor efficiency alone should be the primary aim but an intermediate PES that is ?fairly efficient and efficiently fair? may bridge the gap between PES theory and the practical implementation of PES to increase ES provision and improve livelihoods.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B. 2011. Fairly efficient and efficiently fair: success factors and constraints in payment and reward for environmental schemes in Asia. Wageningen, the Netherlands. : Wageningen University and Research. 176 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2631</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>32</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0032-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Meso Debate: Linking Macro Debate with Micro Debate to Develop REDD</maintitle>
	<author>Martua T Sirait and Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 16</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>This brief describes the process in developing the agenda for regional strategy on
climate change. The brief focuses on discussion on regional responsibilities and steps need to be taken in agriculture and forestry sectors to support national commitment to reduce emission by 26%. Although issues on REDD incentives and carbon markets are important, we do include it in this brief.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Sirait MT and Agung P. 2011. Meso Debate: Linking Macro Debate with Micro Debate to Develop REDD. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5, GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2630</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>31</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0031-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Towards recognition of ?Hutan Nagari? in ?Nagari Salingka Danau</maintitle>
	<author>Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 15</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Singkarak Lake is located in West Sumatra, Indonesia and Nagari Salingka Danau
Singkarak refers to all the Nagari (equivalent to district) surrounding Singkarak Lake.
The lake has many function and is has an important source of livelihood for the community in the area such as fish farming, agricultural activities and ecotourism that
adhere to local culture and religion.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Agung P. 2011. Towards recognition of ‘Hutan Nagari’ in ‘Nagari Salingka Danau. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2629</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>30</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0030-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Spatial planning and distribution of benefits of forest resources in Tanjung Jabung Barat: an opinion</maintitle>
	<author>Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 14</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Having a good Regional Spatial Land-use Planning (Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah = RTRW) maybe the only opportunity to achieve low (carbon) emission development. Institutionally, as a formal ?rule of the game? in providing guidance to regional development, RTRW is very often weak and failed due to the processes involved in its birth. RTRW is not just a legal document to legalized utilization and allocation of natural resources. It depicts, more importantly, rights and access to different component of
natural resources. This brief contains opinion of the writer to first identify and understand issues on distribution of natural resources benefits depicted in RTRW of Tanjung Jabung Barat Regency. Theory of Access was used as a framework to map out allocation and distribution of benefits of land and forest resource to achieve low-carbon-emission development.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Agung P. 2011. Spatial planning and distribution of benefits of forest resources in Tanjung Jabung Barat: an opinion. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2628</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>29</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0029-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Co-existence of people and orangutan in Sumatra. Stabilising gradients for landscape multifunctionality</maintitle>
	<author>Hesti L. Tata, Atiek Widayati, Elok Mulyoutami and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB Policy Brief no. 20</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract>Multifunctional landscapes and species-rich agroforests can support biodiversity conservation. Command- and-control conservation approaches tend to create sharp distinctions between protected areas and surrounding agriculture. Can a village?agroforest?forest landscape gradient be stable? Or is it part of a continuous process of forest conversion that in the end will leave hardly any conservation values intact? The landscape of Batang Toru, Sumatra offers a case study. It is home to a genetically unique Sumatran orangutan population and to people of diverse backgrounds. It provides insight into the types of government policy and market-based instruments that are needed to stabilise the existing gradient.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Tata HL, Widayati A, Mulyoutami E and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Co-existence of people and orangutan in Sumatra. Stabilising gradients for landscape multifunctionality. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2627</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>418</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0418-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Optimum pruning intensity for reducing crop suppression in a Gmelina?maize smallholder agroforestry system in Claveria, Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Manuel Bertomeu, James M Roshetko and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Agroforestry Systems</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer Science+Business Media B.V</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-14</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[On-farm trials were conducted to assess the effects of four branch pruning levels on maize grain yield, tree growth and stem shape. The experimental plots consisted of <i>Gmelina</i> (<i>Gmelina arborea</i> R.Br.) trees planted at 1 9 10 m with maize intercropped in the 10 m-wide alleys between lines of trees. Pruning levels consisted of retaining a live crown ratio of 60?70% (T1), 40?50% (T2); 30?40% (T3) and of 20?30% (T4). At the end of the experiment, the total maize grain yield was highest under the high pruning intensity (T4) (18.06 t ha-1) and lowest under T1 (14.48 t ha-1). Maize grain yield under the pruning regime T2 and T3 were 16.08 and 17.21 t ha-1, respectively. Mean annual increment (MAI) in tree diameter was greater (5.0 cm year-1) under T1 than those at T4 (4.1 cm year-1). Pruning regimes T2 and T3 resulted in a MAI of 4.7 and 4.5 cm year-1, respectively. Financial analysis showed that maize-tree systems under T4 were more profitable than under T1 as long as the reduction of the average dbh at harvest were not greater than 1 cm. Pruning trees intensively also
generated greater returns from labour than moderate pruning, as the greater maize grain yields under T4 compensated for the cost of pruning and the lower timber yield. In the context of resource-poor farmers, intensive branch pruning was a practice that prolonged the period of profitable intercropping and was compatible with commercial timber production.]]></abstract>
	<keywords><![CDATA[Pruning, Timber trees, Financial analysis, Tree intercropping, Tree–crop interactions, <i>Gmelina arborea</i>]]></keywords>
	<notes>DOI 10.1007/s10457-011-9435-y</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Bertomeu M, Roshetko JM and Rahayu S. 2011. Optimum pruning intensity for reducing crop suppression in a <i>Gmelina</i>–maize smallholder agroforestry system in Claveria, Philippines. Agroforestry Systems. : P. 1-14.]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 2, GRP 3, TAMMU</grp>
	<publicationid>2626</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>69</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0069-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kunjungan Staf Ahli Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Ke Lokasi RUPES di Nagari Paninggahan, Sumatera Barat</maintitle>
	<author>Juprial</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>15</mainpages>
	<abstract>Kepala Dinas Kehutanan Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Ir. Hendri Octavia, MSi., mengemukakan apresiasinya, ?Kegiatan ini kalau bisa tidak hanya dilaksanakan di Singkarak dan Palupuh saja. Saya berharap ini juga bisa dilaksanakan di kabupaten lain di Sumatera Barat, dan saya siap mendukung penuh kegiatan ini. Kegiatan seperti ini merupakan aplikasi nyata yang selama ini saya inginkan?. Ibu Yetti juga meminta agar para petani dapat menjalankan kegiatan ini dengan serius, karena jika ini berhasil akan
membawa dampak baik bagi kesejahteraan petani di masa depan dan juga bermanfaat langsung terhadap lingkungan.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Juprial. "Kunjungan Staf Ahli Menteri Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Ke Lokasi RUPES di Nagari Paninggahan, Sumatera Barat. "Kiprah Agroforestri 9. Vol.4: 15]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2625</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>68</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0068-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah dan Distribusi Manfaat Sumberdaya Hutan</maintitle>
	<author>Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>13-14</mainpages>
	<abstract>Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) merupakan salah satu atau bahkan satu-satunya peluang untuk mencapai pembangunan rendah emisi. Sebagai suatu institusi (rule of game), RTRW tidak terlepas dari permasalahan mendasar yang melandasi proses pembentukannya. Hal inilah yang membuat RTRW sebagai suatu dokumen legal sering kali gagal menjadi acuan pembangunan daerah. RTRW tidak hanya sebatas ijin dan legalisasi pemanfaatan dan pembagian ruang atas sumberdaya alam (SDA) namun lebih dari itu karena pada setiap SDA melekat manfaat yang berbeda-beda. Tulisan ini merupakan opini penulis sebagai suatu identifikasi awal dalam memahami proses penyusunan atau revisi RTRW Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat (Tanjabar). Cara pandang Teori Akses digunakan untuk menguraikan alokasi dan distribusi manfaat sumberdaya hutan dan lahan untuk menuju pembangunan rendah emisi.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Agung P. "Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah dan Distribusi Manfaat Sumberdaya Hutan. "Kiprah Agroforestri. Vol.4: 13-14]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2624</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>67</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0067-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Cerita sukses seorang guru Sekolah Dasar Negeri di Lubuk Beringin</maintitle>
	<author>Ratna Akiefnawati</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>11-12</mainpages>
	<abstract>Cerita keberhasilan perjuangan H. Balkani tersebut disampaikan dalam acara Lokakarya Dinamika Perubahan dan Penggunaan Kawasan Kelola Rakyat yang diselenggarakan oleh ICRAF bekerjasama dengan KKI-WARSI dengan PT. BSRE, LEI, serta Bappeda Bungo. Pak Haji menyebutkan bahwa sejak Juni 2010 hingga Februari 2011, bokar yang telah dijual ke PT. BSRE mencapai 110 ton dengan keuntungan kotor sebesar Rp 2.150.084.938,-. Sebagian keuntungan disisihkannya untuk membeli 1
unit truk yang dapat mengangkut dan mengirim hasil olah karet ke lokasi pabrik PT. BSRE di Sumatera Utara. Perdagangan langsung dan pengiriman ke PT. BSRE pun semakin lancar setiap minggu.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Akiefnawati R. "Cerita sukses seorang guru Sekolah Dasar Negeri di Lubuk Beringin. "Kiprah Agroforestri 9. Vol.4: 11-12]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2623</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>66</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0066-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Creating Shared Value (CSV): konsep baru dalam dunia usaha</maintitle>
	<author>Hesti L. Tata</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>9-10</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Pendefinisian ulang konsep dan istilah CSR dipandang perlu mengingat tanggung jawab sosial bukan hanya kewajiban bagi perusahaan, tetapi juga bagi semua pihak. Dalam rangka mewujudkan tanggung jawab bagi semua pihak, maka perlu diciptakan manfaat bersama atau creating shared value (CSV) sehingga tanggung jawab bersama dapat terbentuk. Menurut Porter & Kramer (2011), CSV merupakan kebijakan dan proses teknis operasional yang meningkatkan nilainilai kompetitif perusahaan dan secara
bersamaan memajukan kondisi sosial dan ekonomi. Namun, agar tanggung jawab tersebut terjadi secara efektif dan efisien, maka CSV haruslah diciptakan di setiap tahap rantai bisnis. Misalnya, dalam perusahaan yang bergerak dI bidang pangan dan nutrisi, CSV berada pada tiga komponen utama, yaitu: (1) pertanian dan pembangunan
berkelanjutan, (2) lingkungan manufaktur dan sumber daya manusianya (SDM), serta (3) produk dan konsumen. Dengan konsep ini, baik perusahaan maupun masyarakat
akan mendapatkan manfaat yang sinergis.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Tata HL. "Creating Shared Value (CSV): konsep baru dalam dunia usaha. "Kiprah Agroforestri 9. Vol.4: 9-10]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2622</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>65</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0065-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agroforestri Karet: Kawasan alternatif pelestarian jenis-jenis burung</maintitle>
	<author>Asep Ayat</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>6-8</mainpages>
	<abstract>Di balik rimbunnya agroforestri karet, tidak hanya pemilik kebun saja yang dapat menikmati hasil getah karet, tetapi berbagai jenis burungpun memperoleh manfaat dari sistem ini. Tercatat sekitar 46 jenis burung ditemukan pada agroforest karet yang diamati di Kabupaten Simalungun, Sumatera Utara.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Ayat A. "Agroforestri Karet: Kawasan alternatif pelestarian jenis-jenis burung. "Kiprah Agroforestri 9. Vol.4: 6-8]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2621</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>64</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0064-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Mengembalikan Kejayaan Jelutung di Hutan Gambut</maintitle>
	<author>Dri Handoyo</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>3-5</mainpages>
	<abstract>Kemana jelutung-jelutung tersebut menghilang? Jelutung, tanaman bergetah yang menjadi sumber bahan baku untuk permen karet, pernah menjadi hasil hutan non kayu yang cukup penting bagi sebagian masyarakat di Tanjung Jabung Barat. Tanaman ini pernah menjadi sumber penghidupan masyarakat pada sekitar tahun 1990, namun secara perlahan berangsur menghilang tak berjejak. Tulisan ini merupakan gambaran perjuangan Dinas Kehutanan Tanjung Jabung Barat dalam upaya mengembalikan lagi kejayaan jelutung.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Handoyo D. "Mengembalikan Kejayaan Jelutung di Hutan Gambut. "Kiprah Agroforestri 9. Vol.4: 3-5]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2620</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>48</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0048-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 9</maintitle>
	<author>Dri Handoyo, Asep Ayat, Hesti L. Tata, Ratna Akiefnawati, Putra Agung and Juprial</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>1-16</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Penulis tamu kita kali ini menyuguhkan kisah menarik mengenai jelutung. Orang awam mungkin banyak yang belum tahu bahwa bahan baku permen karet adalah jelutung, tanaman bergetah yang tumbuh di daerah Tanjung Jabung Barat, propinsi Jambi.
Namun jelutung kini mulai dirasa menghilang. Bagaimana Dinas Kehutanan Tanjung Jabung Barat menyikapi hal ini?</br></br>
Selanjutnya kita beranjak ke Simalungun, Sumatera Utara, daerah yang mulai terancam berkurang tutupan hutannya, juga kehidupan burung yang merupakan satwa yg terpengaruh oleh perubahan alam. Hilangnya pohon hutan dan tumbuhan semak
membuat sulit burung-burung untuk bersarang dan berlindung. Burung-burung tersebut berjuang harus bertahan hidup dan berkembang biak, sehingga kita masih dapat menikmati suara dan keindahan bulunya.</br></br>
Menciptakan manfaat bersama, tentunya hal ini yang diharapkan oleh semua umat manusia di dunia. Sebuah konsep dalam dunia usaha juga kami sajikan disini.</br></br>
Masih tentang manfaat...., sumberdaya alam hutan mempunyai manfaat bagi kehidupan manusia. Namun bagaimana cara mendistribusikannya dengan baik di berbagai sektor pertanian, perkebunan dan kehutanan menuju rendah emisi? Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) merupakan peluang untuk mencapai pembangunan tersebut.</br></br>
Sebuah kisah menarik lainnya datang dari Pak Haji Balkaini, seorang guru SDN Lubuk Beringin, yang menyimpan cita-cita tinggi untuk menyekolahkan anak-anaknya ke perguruan tinggi kelak. Ikuti kisah Pak Haji yang juga menjadi seorang penyadap
karet yang sukses.</br></br>
Sebagai penutup, kami menyuguhkan liputan khusus dari Nagari Paninggahan, Sumatera Barat. Kunjungan Staf Ahli Menteri Kehutanan ke Danau Singkarak, yang merupakan pilot model imbal jasa lingkungan berbasis karbon agar dapat diterapkan di
lokasi lain di Indonesia. Sebuah kunci kesuksesan adalah menciptakan sebuah upaya bersama yang melibatkan masyarakat yang aktif dan berperan penting dalam pembangunan daerahnya.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Handoyo D, Ayat A, Tata HL, Akiefnawati R, Agung P and Juprial . 2011. Kiprah Agroforestri 9. In: Rahayu S, Tarigan J and Mulyoutami E,eds. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2, GRP 3, GRP 4, GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2619</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>165</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0165-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Keanekaragaman jenis burung di habitat agroforestri dan hutan primer di dalam kawasan Sibulan-bulan, Batang Toru, Sumatera Utara</maintitle>
	<author>Jihad</author>
	<yearpubs>2009</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Jurusan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Jakarta</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Jakarta, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>62</totalpages>
	<descript1>Program Studi Biologi</descript1>
	<descript2>S1</descript2>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui keanekaragaman jenis burung di habitat agroforestri dan hutan primer di dalam kawasan Sibulan-bulan, Batang Toru, Sumatera Utara, penelitian ini dilakukan pada bulan Maret-Agustus 2008, dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif survey. Tehnik pengmbilan data menggunakan metode jalur (<i>Transect</i>) dan Daftar 20 Mackinnon. 146 jenis dengan total 1036 individu burung teramati, di habitat agroforestri sebanyak 76 jenis burung dan hutan primer sebanyak 127 jenis. Sebanyak 30 jenis burung yang teramati pada kedua habitat merupakan jenis burung yang terancam punah secara global. Keanekaragaman jenis burung pada agroforestri sebesar 4.04 dan pada hutan primer sebesar 4.60. dengan kesamaan sebesar 0.56. Hal ini disebabkan karena ekosistem hutan primer yang lebih kompleks, dengan sumber pakan yang beragam, keragaman vegetasi yang tinggi, stratifikasi vegetasi yang lebih beragam serta mikrohabitat yang lebih beragam dibandingkan dengan agroforestri. Kesamaan jenis burung pada habitat agroforestri dan hutan disebabkan karena perkembangan agroforestri yang semakin mirip dengan hutan sekunder dan banyak jenis vegetasi pada agroforestri yang mirip dengan hutan primer. Hasil di atas menunjukkan keanekaragaman jenis burung pada agroforestri dan hutan primer cukup tinggi, dengan keanekaragaman jenis burung pada hutan primer lebih tinggi dibandingkan habitat agroforestri, sehingga diperlukan usaha dari masyarakat sekitar dan pihak terkait untuk dapat menjaga habitat agroforestri dan hutan primer.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Agroforestri, hutan primer, keanekaragaman jenis burung, Sibulan-bulan</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Jihad. 2009. Keanekaragaman jenis burung di habitat agroforestri dan hutan primer di dalam kawasan Sibulan-bulan, Batang Toru, Sumatera Utara. Jakarta, Indonesia. : Jurusan Biologi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 62 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2618</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>164</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0164-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Nilai insentif karbon hutan rakyat kemenyan berbasis voluntary carbon market di Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara</maintitle>
	<author>Bambang Setyo Antoko</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>99</totalpages>
	<descript1>Program Studi Ilmu Pengelolaan Hutan</descript1>
	<descript2>S3</descript2>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilakukan pada dua model pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat Kemenyan (HRK) di Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara, Provinsi Sumatera Utara yaitu model Kemenyan-Tanaman Campuran dan model Kemenyan-Karet pada bulan April sampai Juli 2010. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua tahap, yaitu penghitungan simpanan karbon dan tahap penilaian ekonomi. Penghitungan simpanan karbon mengacu kepada metode yang dilakukan oleh Hairiah dan Rahayu (2007). Sampel plot ditentukan secara disengaja (<i>purposive</i>) berdasarkan pengamatan di lapangan pada model agroforestri yang dilaksanakan dan dikembangkan oleh petani HRK di Kab. Taput. Jumlah plot pengukuran karbon yang diambil secara keseluruhan adalah 30 plot. Selain itu dilakukan juga pengumpulan data sosial ekonomi melalui panduan kuesioner yaitu sebanyak 40 orang responden yang dilakukan secara disengaja (<i>purposive</i>) dimana responden merupakan petani kemenyan pada kedua model agroforestri tersebut. Tahapan penilaian kelayakan ekonomi dilakukan untuk memperoleh gambaran mengenai kelayakan hutan rakyat tanpa dan dengan mekanisme karbon. Beberapa parameter yang digunakan dalam hal ini adalah <i>Net Present Value</i> (NPV), <i>Benefit Cost Ratio</i> (BCR) dan <i>Internal Rate of Return</i> (IRR).]]></abstract>
	<keywords><![CDATA[Insentif karbon, Hutan Rakyat Kemenyan, perdagangan karbon sukarela, <i>Voluntary Carbon Market</i>, agroforestri]]></keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Antoko BS. 2011. Nilai insentif karbon hutan rakyat kemenyan berbasis <i>voluntary carbon market</i> di Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. Bogor, Indonesia. : Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. 99 p.]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2617</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>153</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0153-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Performance of Three Rambutan Varieties (Nephelium lappaceum L.) on Various Nursery Media</maintitle>
	<author>Khalilal Mitras, James M Roshetko, Sabaruddin and Nurhayati</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ICRAF Working Paper no 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5716/WP11232.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>10</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The growth of three rambutan varieties (<i>Nephelium lappaceum</i> L.) was evaluated on three different nursery media at the agricultural experimental station of Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam Banda Aceh. The seed of rambutan varieties glu, nona and binjai were collected from a community plantation in Padang Tiji district. The nursery medium tested included a farmer-made compost and two researcher-made composts. The experimental design used was a factorial Randomize Complete Block
Design (RCBD) 3 varieties x 3 nursery media, replicated three times. The growth parameters measured were seedling height (cm), stem diameter (mm), leaf area (cm2), fresh weight of seedlings (g), dried weight of seedlings (g), root length (cm), root number, and root weight (g). Measurements were madeat 30, 45, 60 and 75 days after planting. Analysis of variance and honestly significant difference tests were used to analyze the growth data. Results show that variety glu had greater diameter growth and dry weight than other varieties; supporting local beliefs and practice that variety glu is a better rootstock. Additionally, the farmer compost promoted significantly better root growth compared to the other composts.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>vegetative propagation, farmer propagation practices, rootstock quality, post-disaster and post-conflict land rehabilitation</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Mitras K, Roshetko JM, Sabaruddin  and Nurhayati . 2011. Performance of Three Rambutan Varieties (<i>Nephelium lappaceum</i> L.) on Various Nursery Media. ICRAF Working Paper no 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.5716/WP11232.PDFBogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 10 p.]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, TAMMU</grp>
	<publicationid>2616</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>163</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0163-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kajian cadangan karbon pada lahan gambut tropika yang didrainase untuk tanaman tahunan</maintitle>
	<author>Maswar</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>165</totalpages>
	<descript1>Program Studi Ilmu Tanah</descript1>
	<descript2>S3</descript2>
	<abstract>Ekosistem gambut berperan sangat penting dalam skala global, baik dari
aspek ekologis, sosial maupun perekonomian masyarakat. Disisi lain, ekosistem
gambut adalah unik, rapuh dan memiliki sifat tidak dapat diperbaharui. Proses
pembentukannya memerlukan waktu ribuan tahun, dan bila terjadi kerusakan, sangat
sulit untuk diperbaiki atau bahkan mungkin tidak bisa pulih sama sekali. Luas lahan
gambut dunia sekitar 3% dari luas permukaan bumi yakni sekitar 400 juta hektar,
namun menyimpan karbon sangat besar yang diperkirakan sebanyak 550 Giga ton,
atau setara dengan 75% dari seluruh karbon di atmosfer. Khusus untuk Indonesia
yang mewakili daerah gambut tropika, memiliki luas lahan gambut sekitar 265.500
km2, menyimpan cadangan karbon sekitar 54.016 Mega ton. Mengingat cadangan
karbon yang besar pada lahan gambut sedangkan ekosistemnya sangat rapuh, maka
apabila tidak dikelola dengan baik akan menyebabkan kehilangan karbon yang
banyak, terutama dalam bentuk gas metan (CH4) dan karbon dioksida (CO2) ke
atmosfer, sehingga akan semakin meningkatkan emisi gas rumah kaca (GRK).</abstract>
	<keywords>Tanaman tahunan, konservasi, cadangan C, kehilangan C, drainase, gambut</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Maswar M. 2010. Kajian cadangan karbon pada lahan gambut tropika yang didrainase untuk tanaman tahunan. Bogor, Indonesia. : Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. 165 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2615</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>276</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0276-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Climate in Asia and the Pacific: A Synthesis of APN Activities</maintitle>
	<editor>Michael J Manton, Lance Heath, James Salinger and Linda Anne Stevenson</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Japan</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>78</totalpages>
	<abstract>The adverse effects of climate change and natural climate variability pose a significant threat to humanity, with the poorest communities being the most vulnerable. Scientific understanding of our climate is advancing at a significant rate, with new information emerging about the likely impacts of climate change, the options to adapt to these changes, and new approaches to mitigation.</abstract>
	<notes>Rodel lasco is one of contributor author</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Climate in Asia and the Pacific: A Synthesis of APN Activities. Japan. : Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN). 2011. 78 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2614</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>275</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0275-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Orangutan dan Ekonomi Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari di Sumatera</maintitle>
	<editor>Serge Wich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>UNEP/GRASP/PanEco/YEL/ICRAF/GRID-Arendal</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Norway</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>83</totalpages>
	<abstract>Studi ini mengeksplorasi peluang pada jalur yang lebih lestari untuk pembangunan dan mengupayakan rekonsiliasi antara hutan dan konservasi keanekaragaman hayati dengan kemajuan ekonomi. Fokusnya pada dua lokasi percobaan di Pulau Sumatera, yaitu rawa Tripa dan hutan pegunungan Batang Toru, keduanya merupakan tempat populasi orangutan yang signifikan. Penilaian itu menghitung perbandingan nilai ekonomi antara bentuk tata guna lahan yang tidak lestari dan tataguna lahan yang lestari, serta melihat peran pengurangan emisi dari deforestasi dan degradasi (REDD) dan skema pembayaran jasa ekosistem (PES) yang lebih luas dalam mencapai tujuan konservasi dan pembangunan secara seimbang.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Orangutan dan Ekonomi Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari di Sumatera. Norway. : UNEP/GRASP/PanEco/YEL/ICRAF/GRID-Arendal. 2011. 83 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2613</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>274</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0274-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Orangutans and the Economics of Sustainable Forest Management in Sumatra</maintitle>
	<editor>Serge Wich</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>UNEP/GRASP/PanEco/YEL/ICRAF/GRID-Arendal</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Norway</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>83</totalpages>
	<abstract>This study explores opportunities for a more sustainable pathway to development and looks for reconciliation between forest and biodiversity conservation and economic progress. It focuses on two pilot sites on the island of Sumatra, namely Tripa swamp
and the mountain forests of Batang Toru, both hosting significant orangutan populations. The assessment quantifies the economic trade-offs between unsustainable and sustainable forms of land use, and considers the role of Reducing Emissions from
Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) and broader Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes in achieving balanced conservation and development objectives.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Orangutans and the Economics of Sustainable Forest Management in Sumatra. : UNEP/GRASP/PanEco/YEL/ICRAF/GRID-Arendal. 2011. 83 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2612</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>417</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0417-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Social Role-Play Games Vs Individual Perceptions of Conservation and PES Agreements for Maintaining Rubber Agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Grace B.Villamor and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Ecology and Society</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The Resilience Alliance</publisher>
	<volume>16</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>1-20</mainpages>
	<abstract>Financial incentives can both support and undermine social norms compatible with environmental service enhancement. External co-investment?e.g., through incentives from programs to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) and eco-certification?needs to synergize with local efforts by understanding local dynamics and conditions for free and prior informed consent. We assessed the perceptions and behavior of rubber agroforest farmers under existing conservation agreements as a step toward institutionalized reward schemes for agro-biodiversity using questionnaires and roleplaying games (RPG). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply such a combination of methods to explore the perceptions of payments for environmental services (PES). Results revealed a strong conservation belief system and social norms in the research site, with indications that individual interest in converting old rubber agroforest to oil palm, with consequent private gain and loss of local social agrobiodiversity benefits, is suppressed in the social context of a role-playing game. In the game, all financial bids by external agents to secure an oil palm foothold in the village, were rejected despite indications of declining income in the village. Agents promoting an eco-certification scheme in the RPG had success and
the responses obtained in the game can assist in the actual rollout of such a scheme without creating unrealistic expectations of its financial benefits. Co-investment schemes that require higher levels of trust and clarity of performance measures will have to address the potential discrepancy between individual preferences and community-level planning and decisions, while recognizing that social norms color the
responses of individuals when presented with alternatives.</abstract>
	<keywords>conservation agreements; payments/rewards for agro-biodiversity conservation; role playing game; rubber agroforest</keywords>
	<notes>http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04339-160327</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Villamor GB and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Social Role-Play Games Vs Individual Perceptions of Conservation and PES Agreements for Maintaining Rubber Agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia. Ecology and Society. 16(3):P. 1-20.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, RUPES</grp>
	<publicationid>2611</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>28</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0028-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Linking scientific knowledge with policy action in Natural Resource Management</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Delia Catacutan and William C. Clark</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB Policy Brief 19</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>For more than a decade, the ASB Partnership has tried various approaches in the tropical forest margins. A recent effort to take stock, reflect on what has worked well, and identify the main challenges enabled scientists to distinguish three types of knowledge that reside with the three main actors:
1. Local ecological knowledge (LEK) resides among local people and is embedded in local ?context?;
2. Public space/policy ecological knowledge (PEK) is concerned with immediate ?impact?; and
3. Scientific, researchers or modellers? ecological knowledge, (SEK/MEK) is seeking generic ?mechanisms?.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Catacutan D and Clark WC. 2011. Linking scientific knowledge with policy action in Natural Resource Management. Nairobi, Kenya. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 2, GRP 6, ASB</grp>
	<publicationid>2610</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>317</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0317-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Linking climate change risks and rights of upland peoples in the Mekong</maintitle>
	<author>Xu Jianchu and Rajesh Daniel</author>
	<editor>Kate Lazarus, Nathan Badenoch, Nga Dao and Bernadette P. Resurreccion</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Water Rights and Social Justice in the Mekong Region</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Earthscan</publisher>
	<publicationplace>London, UK</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>217-244</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Xu Jianchu and Daniel R. 2011. Linking climate change risks and rights of upland peoples in the Mekong. In: Lazarus K, Badenoch N, Dao N and Resurreccion BP,eds. Water Rights and Social Justice in the Mekong Region. London, UK. : Earthscan. P. 217-244.</citation>
	<publicationid>2609</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>316</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0316-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Climate change in the Asian highlands: Socio-economic implications for the Mekong Region</maintitle>
	<author>Xu Jianchu</author>
	<editor>Kate Lazarus, Nathan Badenoch, Nga Dao and Bernadette P. Resurreccion</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Water Rights and Social Justice in the Mekong Region</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Earthscan</publisher>
	<publicationplace>London, UK</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>197-216</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Xu Jianchu. 2011. Climate change in the Asian highlands: Socio-economic implications for the Mekong Region. In: Lazarus K, Badenoch N, Dao N and Resurreccion BP,eds. Water Rights and Social Justice in the Mekong Region. London, UK. : Earthscan. P. 197-216.</citation>
	<publicationid>2608</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>416</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0416-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Arbuscular mycorrhiza maintains nodule function during external NH 4+ supply in Phaseolus vulgaris (L.)</maintitle>
	<author>Peter E. Mortimer, Maria A. Pérez-Fernández and Alex J. Valentine</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Mycorrhiza</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher>
	<abstract>The synergistic benefits of the dual inoculation of legumes with nodule bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) are well established, but the effect of an external NH4+ supply on this tripartite relationship is less clear. This effect of NH4+ supply was investigated with regards to the growth and function of the legume host and both symbionts. Nodulated Phaseolus vulgaris seedlings with and without AM, were grown in a sand medium with either 0 N, 1 mM or 3 mM NH4+. Plants were harvested at 30 days after emergence and measurements were taken for biomass, N2 fixation, photosynthesis, asparagine concentration, construction costs and N nutrition. The addition of NH4+ led to a decline in the percentage AM colonization and nodule dry weights, although AM colonization was affected to a lesser extent. NH4+ supply also resulted in a decrease in the reliance on biological nitrogen fixation (BNF); however, the AM roots maintained higher levels of NH4+ uptake than their non-AM counterparts. Furthermore, the non-AM plants had a higher production of asparagine than the AM plants. The inhibitory effects of NH4+ on nodule function can be reduced by the presence of AM at moderate levels of NH4+ (1 mM), via improving nodule growth or relieving the asparagine-induced inhibition of BNF.</abstract>
	<keywords>Arbuscular mycorrhiza – NH4+  – Nitrogen fixation – Photosynthesis – Asparagines</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Mortimer PE, Pérez-Fernández MA and Valentine AJ. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhiza maintains nodule function during external NH 4+ supply in <i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> (L.). Mycorrhiza. : P. .]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2607</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>415</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0415-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>National parks in China: Experiments with protecting nature and human livelihoods in Yunnan province, Peoples? Republic of China (PRC)</maintitle>
	<author>Zhou DQ and R. Edward Grumbine</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Biological Conservation</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher>
	<volume>144</volume>
	<edition>5</edition>
	<mainpages>1314-1321</mainpages>
	<abstract>Beginning in 1956, China has built a large protected areas system, but has struggled to implement effective management. There remain ongoing problems with administrative authority, unclear regulations, inadequate funding, inappropriate development within protected areas, a dearth of professional capacity, and more. To address these concerns, since 2001, international nongovernment organizations led by The Nature Conservancy have encouraged various levels of government in China to experiment with an international model of national parks. The government in Yunnan province, the center of China?s biological and cultural diversity, has acted to create a national park experimental system with new administrative bureaus, comprehensive regulations, park master plans, and several national park pilots. We review two of these pilots, Pudacuo National Park and Laojun Mountain National Park, to evaluate whether this park model, as it is being applied in Yunnan, offers an improvement to existing nature reserve regulations and implementation. Though the experiment is in its early stages, issues remain around regulatory authority, community participation, park funding and staff capacity.</abstract>
	<keywords>China; Laojun Mountain; National parks; Nature reserves; Protected areas; Pudacuo National Park; Yunnan</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Zhou D and Grumbine RE. 2011. National parks in China: Experiments with protecting nature and human livelihoods in Yunnan province, Peoples’ Republic of China (PRC). Biological Conservation. 144(5):P. 1314-1321.</citation>
	<publicationid>2606</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>414</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0414-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The influence of seed and oil storage on the acid levels of rubber seed oil, derived from Hevea brasiliensis grown in Xishuangbanna, China</maintitle>
	<author>Yixin Zhu, Xu Jianchu and Peter E. Mortimer</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Energy</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher>
	<volume>36</volume>
	<edition>8</edition>
	<mainpages>5403-5408</mainpages>
	<abstract>High acid levels, characteristic of rubber seed oil (RSO), limit RSO use in biodiesel production. The aims of this study were to determine the causes of these high acid levels by investigating what affects the storage of rubber seeds and RSO had on the acid levels. Two storage conditions/methods were evaluated, one representing a proposed storage method (SM 1), the other mimicking storage conditions characteristic to the Xishuangbanna region (SM 2). Furthermore, RSO storage was evaluated by testing RSO acid levels over a 2-month period, under standard storage conditions. Seeds from SM 2 displayed increased seed pile temperatures, higher levels of Mildew infection, lower seed oil content and higher acid levels. Low seed oil content and high acid values of SM 2 were resultant of the high Mildew infection and increased seed pile temperatures. In addition, a critical value of 90% relative humidity of seed piles was identified, above which Mildew infection increased sharply. Storage of crude RSO resulted in increased acid values. This data shows that in order to reduce high acid values, seed pile temperature, humidity and Mildew infections need to be kept to a minimum, as well as the storage time of the seeds and the RSO.</abstract>
	<keywords>Hevea brasiliensis, Rubber seed oil, Oil acid levels, Storage, Mildew, Biodiesel</keywords>
	<notes>doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.054</notes>
	<region>China</region>
	<pubstatus>IN PRESS</pubstatus>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Zhu Y, Xu Jianchu  and Mortimer PE. 2011. The influence of seed and oil storage on the acid levels of rubber seed oil, derived from <i>Hevea brasiliensis</i> grown in Xishuangbanna, China. Energy. 36(8):P. 5403-5408.]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2605</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>413</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0413-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Mekong Hydropower Development</maintitle>
	<author>R. Edward Grumbine and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Science</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Science</publisher>
	<volume>332</volume>
	<edition>6026</edition>
	<mainpages>178-179</mainpages>
	<abstract>The Mekong River is one of the world's last large rivers remaining mostly undammed. But China is constructing a series of eight hydropower projects on the upper Mekong. Although there are currently no dams across the mainstream channel (not including the tributaries) in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB), nevertheless, in September 2010, the Lao People's Democratic Republic petitioned the Mekong River Commission (MRC) to begin the formal process of approving the first of 11 proposed dams across the lower Mekong (see the figure) (1). Although such a cascade would provide substantial power, it would likely reduce biodiversity and ecosystem service values of the LMB, while undercutting the livelihood and food security of millions of people. Decisions on this initial proposal expected over the coming months by the MRC countries may contribute to promoting high-impact hydropower development or to a movement toward integrated, transboundary river-basin management that could serve as a model for other rivers.</abstract>
	<notes>DOI: 10.1126/science.1200990</notes>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Grumbine RE and Xu Jianchu . 2011. Mekong Hydropower Development. Science. 332(6026):P. 178-179.</citation>
	<publicationid>2604</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>412</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0412-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Management and land use change effects on soil carbon in northern China's grasslands: a synthesis</maintitle>
	<author>Shiping Wang, Andreas Wilkes, Zhicai Zhang, Xiaofeng Chang, Rong Lang, Yanfen Wang and Haishan Niu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment]]></secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier B.V.</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-12</mainpages>
	<abstract>Grasslands cover about 40% of China?s land area. This paper synthesizes 133 papers from China on the impacts of land use conversion and improved management practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) in China?s grasslands. The synthesis finds that overgrazing and conversion of freely grazed grassland to cropland lead to an annual average decline of 2.3?2.8% in SOC, and have caused a loss of 30?35% of total grassland SOC in China. Improved management practices may reverse the loss of SOC. Exclosure of degraded grassland from grazing and conversion of cropland to abandoned fields (i.e. natural restoration) increased carbon content by 34% and 62% on average. Carbon sequestration rates were greatest during the first 30 yr after treatments began and tended to be greatest in the top 10 cm of soil. Carbon sequestration potential was negatively related to initial carbon and nitrogen concentrations in soils. Exclosure from
grazing and the conversion of cropland to abandoned fields resulted in average carbon sequestration rates of 130.4 g C m-2 yr-1 for 0?40 cm soil and 128.0 g C m-2 yr-1 for 0?30 cm soil, representing annual average increases of 5.4?6.3%. Based on our results, achievement of the national objective to exclude grazing livestock from 150 million ha of China?s grasslands and to establish 30 million ha of cultivated pasture by 2020 would sequester over 0.24 Pg C yr-1, which is equivalent to about 16% of fossil fuel CO2
emissions in China in 2006.</abstract>
	<keywords>Carbon sequestration, Grasslands, Land use change, Grazing, Cultivation, Pasture</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<pubstatus>IN PRESS</pubstatus>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Wang S, Wilkes A, Zhang Z, Chang X, Lang R, Wang Y and Niu H. 2011. Management and land use change effects on soil carbon in northern China's grasslands: a synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. : P. 1-12.]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2603</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>411</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0411-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Integrative Management of Commercialized Wild Mushroom: A Case Study of Thelephora ganbajun in Yunnan, Southwest China</maintitle>
	<author>Jun He, Zhimei Zhou, Huixian Yang and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Environmental Management</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer Science+Business Media B.V</publisher>
	<volume>48</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>98-108</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The management of wild mushroom is interdisciplinary in nature, whereby the biophysical considerations have to be incorporated into the context of a wide range of social, economic and political concerns. However, to date, little documentation exists illustrating an interdisciplinary approach to management of wild mushrooms. Moreover, the empirical case studies necessary for developing applicable and practical methods are even more rare. This paper adopted an interdisciplinary approach combining participatory methods to improve the habitat management of <i>Thelephora ganbajun</i>, an endemic and one of the most economically valuable mushroom species in Southwest China. The paper documents an empirical case of how an interdisciplinary approach facilitated the development of a scientific basis for policy and management practice, and built the local capacity to create, adopt and sustain the new rules and techniques of mushroom management. With this integrative perspective, a sustainable management strategy was developed, which was found not only technically feasible for farmers, but also acceptable to the government from an ecological and policy-related perspective. More importantly, this approach has greatly contributed to raising the income of farmers. The paper highlights how the integration of biophysical and socioeconomic factors and different knowledge systems provided a holistic perspective to problem diagnosis and resolution, which helped to cope with conventional scientific dilemmas. Finally, it concludes that the success of this interdisciplinary approach is significant in the context of policy decentralization and reform for incorporating indigenous knowledge and local participation in forest management.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Non-timber forest products (NTFPs), Fungi, Interdisciplinary research, Community-based natural resource management, Indigenous knowledge, Participatory action research</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[He J, Zhou Z, Yang H and Xu Jianchu . 2011. Integrative Management of Commercialized Wild Mushroom: A Case Study of <i>Thelephora ganbajun</i> in Yunnan, Southwest China. Environmental Management. 48(1):P. 98-108.]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2602</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>410</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0410-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Creating a ?Conservation with Chinese Characteristics?</maintitle>
	<author>R. Edward Grumbine and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Biological Conservation</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher>
	<volume>144</volume>
	<edition>5</edition>
	<mainpages>1347-1355</mainpages>
	<abstract>As China becomes increasingly influential in international affairs, it is important to understand the unique characteristics of Chinese environmental values and policy processes. This is especially true given the rate and scale of China?s environmental impacts on natural ecosystems from local to international levels. Currently, however, Chinese conservation values, policies and practices are not well-integrated. We identify four systemic barriers to conservation in China that contribute to this poor integration: weak rule of law; unclear land tenure; top down government authority; and disconnects between scientific research and management implementation. To advance China toward an environmentally secure future, we suggest that combining traditional Chinese environmental values with contemporary science and international conservation practices will help to create a ?Conservation with Chinese Characteristics?. We do not believe that traditional values should replace modern science and management. Rather, we suggest that, given the cultural and political conditions in China today, using traditional values to frame contemporary environmental science and ecosystem-based management may create stronger societal support for conservation implementation.</abstract>
	<keywords>China; Conservation planning; Ecosystem-based management; Environmental education; Science and values</keywords>
	<notes>doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.03.006</notes>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Grumbine RE and Xu Jianchu . 2011. Creating a ‘Conservation with Chinese Characteristics’. Biological Conservation. 144(5):P. 1347-1355.</citation>
	<publicationid>2601</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>LN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>41</cnposition>
	<callnumber>LN0041-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Tools for use in Integrated Natural Resources Management (INRM) and Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam (TULViet)</maintitle>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<totalpages>89</totalpages>
	<abstract>Integrated Natural Resources Management (INRM) aims to identify land-use practices that increase production while maintaining natural capital and continuing to provide ecosystem services at local and global scales (Izac and Sanchez 2001). The overall objective of INRM research and development activities is to help managers at various levels do a better job of managing natural resources. Natural resource management problems that relate local stakeholder decisions are usually different at different scales. The challenge is how should the opportunities for adaptive response among diverse interest groups, at a number of hierarchical levels, be included in the assessment of impacts on the livelihoods of rural people.</abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>2011. : Tools for use in Integrated Natural Resources Management (INRM) and Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam (TULViet). 1Vietnam. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 89 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2600</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>63</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0063-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>REDD+ di Berau: Melacak emisi menimbang implikasi</maintitle>
	<author>Arif Rahmanulloh and Muhammad Sofiyuddin</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 8</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>14-15</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Perubahan iklim dan pemanasan global menjadi isu internasional yang sedang hangat dibicarakan di berbagai kalangan ilmuwan. Negara-negara di dunia menginisiasi berbagai pertemuan untuk membahas penyebab dan solusi untuk mengatasinya. Konfrensi para pihak ke 12 di Bali pada tahun 2007 menghasilkan satu kesepakatan
mengenai mekanisme penurunan emisi yang dikenal dengan <i>Reduction Emision from Deforestration and Degradation</i> (REDD).]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Rahmanulloh A and Sofiyuddin M. "REDD+ di Berau: Melacak emisi menimbang implikasi. "Kiprah Agroforestri 8. Vol.4: 14-15]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2599</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>62</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0062-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Menanam pohon di luar kawasan hutan: Dapatkah menjawab isu perubahan iklim?</maintitle>
	<author>Geoffrey Kamadi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 8</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>12-13</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Perubahan iklim menjadi salah satu masalah lingkungan yang dampaknya tidak dapat dihindari oleh manusia. Namun isu perubahan iklim ini, baik dalam hal faktor penyebab, dampak dan upaya mitigasinya masih dan terus menjadi perdebatan di dunia.</br></br>
Mengurangi kegiatan yang berkaitan dengan penebangan pohon baik oleh pemerintah maupun masyarakat dianggap sebagai cara terbaik untuk mengimbangi dampak perubahan iklim. Meningkatkan luas tutupan hutan dan mengurangi penebangan
hutan saat ini merupakan tujuan yang sudah disepakati dalam upaya mitigasi perubahan iklim.]]></abstract>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Kamadi G. "Menanam pohon di luar kawasan hutan: Dapatkah menjawab isu perubahan iklim?. "Kiprah Agroforestri 8. Vol.4: 12-13]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2598</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>61</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0061-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Memanen gula kelapa di lahan agroforestri</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 8</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>10-11</mainpages>
	<abstract>Guna mendapatkan nira, pria penyadap harus memotong ujung tongkol bunga kelapa (manggar) dan pada ujungnya diletakkan sebuah wadah penampung (biasanya digunakan jirigen plastik) dan dibiarkan selama 12 jam baru kemudian dikumpulkan. Setiap harinya rata-rata terkumpul 25-30 liter nira yang diperoleh dari 20 pohon kelapa. Proses pemasakan atau pengentalan nira menjadi gula kelapa dilakukan oleh para wanita. Untuk memproduksi gula kelapa, pengrajin membutuhkan kayu bakar berkisar antara 0.5 - 1 m /hari. Jumlah kayu yang dibutuhkan bervariasi tergantung dari hasil sadapan nira dan musim. Pada musim penghujan, produksi nira relatif lebih banyak dari pada di musim kemarau, sehingga jumlah kayu bakar yang dibutuhkan juga akan meningkat. Jumlah kayu bakar yang dibutuhkan di musim penghujan rata-rata 1 m untuk 85 liter nira kelapa, dan di musim kemarau ratarata sekitar 0.8 m untuk 67 liter (Tumisem dan Suwarno, 2008).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Hairiah K. "Memanen gula kelapa di lahan agroforestri. "Kiprah Agroforestri 8. Vol.4: 10-11]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2597</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>60</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0060-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Membangun perencanaan wilayah partisipatif di Kabupaten Aceh Barat</maintitle>
	<author>Feri Johana, Andree Ekadinata and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 8</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>5-6</mainpages>
	<abstract>Perencanaan wilayah merupakan
sebuah upaya untuk mengatur
pemanfaatan ruang dalam suatu
wilayah berkaitan dengan akitivitas
masyarakat dalam memanfaatkan ruang
tersebut. Tanpa ada perencanaan yang
melibatkan masyarakat hanya akan
menempatkan masyarakat sebagai
penonton dan tidak dapat menentukan
masa depan atas pengelolaan
wilayahnya sendiri. Masyarakat akan
mengalami kesulitan untuk
mengadaptasi terhadap kenyataan
ruang yang tidak sesuai dengan
keinginannya bahkan sangat mungkin
akan menentang terhadap tata ruang
yang sudah dibuat.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Johana F, Ekadinata A and Dewi S. "Membangun perencanaan wilayah partisipatif di Kabupaten Aceh Barat. "Kiprah Agroforestri 8. Vol.4: 5-6]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2596</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>59</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0059-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Membangun Kebun Bibit Unggul: Sarana untuk meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat</maintitle>
	<author>Anang Setiawan and Pratiknyo Purnomosidhi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 8</secondtitle>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>3-4</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Beberapa literatur sejarah menyebutkan bahwa masyarakat Aceh memiliki sistem budidaya tanaman yang mencampurkan tanaman buah-buahan dan tanaman keras dalam sebidang lahan, atau dalam bahasa lokal sering disebut ? <i>kebun dumpeu na</i>? yang artinya adalah 'kebun serba ada'. ?<i> Kebun dumpeu na</i>? yang dalam istilah asing dikenal sebagai agroforest memegang peranan penting bagi
penghidupan masyarakat, karena sebagian besar sumber mata pencaharian masyarakat Aceh terutama di pedesaan berasal dari hasil kebun agroforest.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Setiawan A and Purnomosidhi P. "Membangun Kebun Bibit Unggul: Sarana untuk meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat. "Kiprah Agroforestri 8. Vol.4: 3-4]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2595</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>408</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0408-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Understanding and Integrating Local Perceptions of Trees and Forests into Incentives for Sustainable Landscape Management</maintitle>
	<author>Jean-Laurent Pfund, John Daniel Watts, Manuel Boissie`re, Amandine Boucard, Renee Marie Bullock, Andree Ekadinata, Sonya Dewi, Laure`ne Feintrenie, Patrice Levang, Salla Rantala, Douglas Sheil, Terence Clarence Heethom Sunderland and Zora Lea Urech</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Environmental Management</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Environmental Management</publisher>
	<volume>48</volume>
	<mainpages>334–349</mainpages>
	<abstract>We examine five forested landscapes in Africa (Cameroon, Madagascar, and Tanzania) and Asia (Indonesia and Laos) at different stages of landscape change. In all five areas, forest cover (outside of protected areas) continues to decrease despite local people?s recognition of the importance of forest products and services. After forest conversion, agroforestry systems and fallows provide multiple functions and valued products, and retain significant biodiversity. But there are indications that such land use is transitory, with gradual simplification and loss of complex agroforests and fallows as land use becomes increasingly individualistic and profit driven. In Indonesia and Tanzania, farmers favor monocultures (rubber and oil palm, and sugarcane, respectively) for their high financial returns, with these systems replacing existing complex agroforests.
In the study sites in Madagascar and Laos, investments in agroforests and new crops remain rare, despite government attempts to eradicate swidden systems and their multifunctional fallows. We discuss approaches to assessing local values related to landscape cover and associated goods and services. We highlight discrepancies between individual and collective responses in characterizing land use tendencies, and discuss the effects of accessibility on land management. We conclude that a combination of social, economic, and spatially explicit assessment methods is necessary to inform land use planning. Furthermore, any efforts to modify current trends will require clear incentives, such as through carbon finance. We speculate on the nature of such incentive schemes and the possibility of rewarding the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale and in a socially equitable manner.</abstract>
	<keywords>Landscape management,  Local perceptions, Biodiversity conservation, Agroforestry</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Pfund J, Watts JD, Boissie`re M, Boucard A, Bullock RM, Ekadinata A, Dewi S, Feintrenie L, Levang P, Rantala S, Sheil D, Sunderland TC and Urech ZL. 2011. Understanding and Integrating Local Perceptions of Trees and Forests into Incentives for Sustainable Landscape Management. Environmental Management. 48: P. 334–349.</citation>
	<publicationid>2594</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>407</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0407-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rubber agroforests in a changing landscape: analysis of land use/cover trajectories in  Bungo district, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata and Gregoire Vincent</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Forests, Trees and Livelihoods</secondtitle>
	<publisher>A B Academic Publishers</publisher>
	<volume>20</volume>
	<mainpages>3–14</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Land cover has changed dramatically in Sumatra Island, Indonesia over the last decades. Rampant deforestation has drawn a lot of attention due to the potential global impact of the associated carbon stock loss on climate warming and the erosion of biodiversity. The various land uses which replace natural forest are not equally benign to the environment. Rubber agroforests (jungle rubber) are extensive traditional cropping systems. They have been singled out by previous studies as the best land use option for biodiversity conservation once forest is cleared, while allowing farmers to make a living from the deforested land. But how sustainable are complex agroforestry systems themselves? Are they not just a transient stage in the overall process of land use intensification?</br></br>
We studied land cover change in the Bungo district, in Jambi, Sumatra (Indonesia), a 4,550 km2 area. Large forest tracks have been cleared since the early seventies and replaced by rubber plantations, oil palm plantations and other agricultural land-uses. Landsat images taken between 1973 and 2005 were used to quantify the trends of land cover changes in the area. During that period forest cover fell from more than 75% to 30%. Simultaneously monoculture plantations increased from 3% to over 40%, while rubber agroforests, decreased from 15% to 11%. Strikingly most of the rubber agroforests present in 2005 where absent in1973 while most of the rubber agroforests present in 1973 had been replaced by more intensive agricultural systems by 2005.</br></br>
Rubber agroforests are now the ultimate reservoir of the original lowland forest biodiversity since natural forest has almost completely disappeared from the peneplain. They are however under growing pressure themselves and have incurred an accelerated conversion rate to more intensive agricultural systems in the period 2002?2005.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>land cover change, drivers of deforestation, rubber agroforests, Indonesia</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A and Vincent G. 2011. Rubber agroforests in a changing landscape: analysis of land use/cover trajectories in  Bungo district, Indonesia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. 20: P. 3–14.</citation>
	<publicationid>2593</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>49</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0049-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pengukuran cadangan karbon dari tingkat lahan ke bentang lahan. Edisi ke 2</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah, Andree Ekadinata, Rika Ratna Sari and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>90</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-53-8</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Buku ini merupakan pengembangan dari buku yang terbit sebelumnya (2007) yaitu
?Pengukuran Karbon Tersimpan di Berbagai Macam Penggunaan Lahan?. Namun isi
dari buku tersebut masih terfokus pada pengukuran cadangan karbon di tingkat
lahan saja yang banyak digunakan dalam kegiatan ASB (<i>Alternatives to Slash and
Burn</i>). Sedangkan pada buku edisi kedua ini berisi pengukuran cadangan karbon
menggunakan metoda RaCSA (<i>Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal</i>) yang mencakup cara untuk mengekstrapolasi cadangan karbon dari tingkat lahan ke tingkat bentang
lahan. RaCSA telah diuji pada berbagai jenis penggunaan lahan di berbagai daerah
dengan kondisi iklim yang berbeda melalui kegiatan TUL-SEA (<i>Trees in multi-Use
Landscapes in Southeast Asia</i>) dan ALLREDDI (<i>The Accountability and Local Level Initiative to Reduce Emission from Deforestation and Degradation in Indonesia</i>) yang dikoordinir oleh World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF Southeast Asia). </br></br>
Buku RaCSA ini disusun khusus untuk pengukuran cadangan karbon pada tanah
mineral (tanah kering), sedang untuk pengukuran cadangan karbon pada tanah
gambut dapat dilihat pada seri berikutnya.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Hairiah K, Ekadinata A, Sari RR and Rahayu S. 2011. Pengukuran cadangan karbon dari tingkat lahan ke bentang lahan. Edisi ke 2. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 90 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2592</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>406</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0406-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Users? perspectives on validity of a simulation model for natural resource management</maintitle>
	<author>Betha Lusiana, Meine van Noordwijk, Desi Suyamto, Rachmat Mulia, Laxman Joshi and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability</secondtitle>
	<publisher><![CDATA[Taylor & Francis]]></publisher>
	<volume>9</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>364-378</mainpages>
	<abstract>Managers of agro-ecosystems trade off food production and livelihood strategies against environmental services. They need tools to prospect a wide range of external conditions. Integrated simulation models allow stakeholders to discuss the plausible behaviour of agro-ecosystems and to evaluate dynamic trade-offs, as a basis for planning and policy making in agriculture and natural resource management. However, simulation models need to gain stakeholders? acceptance before they will be utilized. Gaining stakeholders? acceptance likely requires salience, credibility and legitimacy. We surveyed the perceptions and expectations of 122 potential model users in four countries, prioritizing these model attributes. A possible shift in user perception was assessed during a participatory model evaluation of a resource management model (FALLOW) for post-tsunami development in West Aceh (Indonesia). Potential model
users, comprising natural resource managers, policy makers, lecturers and scientists, ranked salience as the most important characteristic for an integrated simulation model, followed by credibility and legitimacy. Model users? occupation, prior exposure and interest in using a simulation model did not have a statistically significant influence
on users? perceptions of model attributes.</abstract>
	<keywords>land-use change model; model users; model validation; participatory approach; salience–credibility–legitimacy</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lusiana B, van Noordwijk M, Suyamto D, Mulia R, Joshi L and Cadisch G. 2011. Users’ perspectives on validity of a simulation model for natural resource management. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 9(2):P. 364-378.</citation>
	<publicationid>2591</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>152</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0152-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Implementasi Kaji Cepat Hidrologi (RHA) di Hulu DAS Brantas, Jawa Timur</maintitle>
	<author>Widianto, Didik Suprayogo, Sudarto and Iva Dewi Lestariningsih</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper nr.121. DOI: 10.5716/WP10338.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>133</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Sumber Brantas Watershed is one out of five sub catchments of the Upper Brantas River, situated in Batu District, East Java, Indonesia and covering an area about 174 km2. Recently, the hydrology of the watershed was considered to be degraded in terms of the quality and quantity of water yield. Fast floods were more often during the rainy seasons, while droughts were more severe during the dry seasons. Much spring water dried out in the dry seasons and two-third of them dried out permanently in the last decade. The condition was often related to the rapid change of landuse in the watershed. The natural forest and agroforestry gardens were converted into rain fed agriculture. Analysis on land sat images from 1989 and 2002 showed that 3,702ha of natural forest and 1,153ha of agroforestry gardens has disappeared. Further analysis showed that the area of rain fed agriculture, settlements and shrubs were increasing during that period. This most likely related to the socio-economics conditions of local community as well as the variability of stakeholders? perception in best watershed management planning and practices.</br></br>
The Rapid Hydrological Appraisal (RHA) implementation at the Sumber Brantas Watershed aimed to test the methodology, which is claimed to be rapid and cheap, and to validate the GenRiver Model ? an important component of the methodology, to learn the stakeholders? perceptions on the watershed management and to build an understanding among stakeholders in order to select the best watershed management practices.</br></br>
RHA itself is claimed as a rapid and cheap methodology that is important in the early steps of an environmental service activity. The method consists of three stages i.e. scooping, awareness and identifying partners. Scooping and identifying partners were reflected from information and data collection about study site, hydrological issues, and stakeholders who involved in the watershed management.</br></br>
Watershed stakeholders consisted of three groups i.e. local community, policy makers and researchers or facilitators. Knowledge, perception and experiences from each group of stakeholders used to be called as LEK (Local Ecological Knowledge), PEK (Policy
Ecological Knowledge), and MEK (Modeler Ecological Knowledge). Meanwhile, the data
collection including spatial data, participatory landscape analysis, local and political
knowledge assessment about watershed ecology, data analysis related on hydrological
condition, and the stakeholders meeting constituted as a package of community awareness about watershed management at the study site.</br></br>
In general, the perceptions on watershed hydrology among the three groups of stakeholders in Sumber Brantas Watershed (i.e. PEK, MEK and LEK) tend to be similar. The important hydrological issues in the Sumber Brantas Watershed are about flash-floods and drought, decrease of the number of springs in the watershed as well as their discharge, the decrease of water quality, and the more intensive soil loss due to erosion and landslide.</br></br>
The three groups of stakeholders agreed that the discharge of main river (Upper Brantas River) depends on seasonal rainfall variability. During rainy seasons, the river discharge tends to be very high, while in dry seasons it dries up. The discharge ratio between rainy and dry season is high and tends to increase annually. The fluctuations of river discharge and the floods frequency is related to the percentage of forest area in the upstream. The above perception is supported by modelers (MEK) as indicated by the calculated discharge through simulation model under various scenarios of land cover areas. The amplitude of maximum and minimum discharges is affected by percentage of forest area in the watershed. Reduction of forest area in the watershed will increase the amplitude of maximum and minimum discharge. The simulation also shows extremely high discharges or flooding following heavy rainfall events.</br></br>
LEK and PEK groups stated that the decreasing of the number of springs as well as the
discharge of the springs in the watershed was affected by deforestation. The deforestation will reduce the recharge area, so that the absence of forest will affect the discharge of the springs nearby. However, the MEK group mentioned that the most relevant recharge area of a spring is not necessarily adjacent to the spring, dependent to geologic and topographic conditions of the area. The three groups perceived that the decrease of the water quality in the watershed is mainly due to sedimentation and water pollution. Sediment in the river is mostly coming from erosion of agricultural and landslides on road-cuts, river-banks and steep lands. Pollutants in the main Brantas River is usually coming from the waste of human activity along the river, such as intensive agriculture, agriculture-based industry, and tourism activities. The agriculture-based industry along the Sumber Brantas watershed that produced pollutants are mushroom and flowers growers, intensive small-scale horticulture practices (fruits, vegetables, and flowers), and small-scale food and beverage industries. Meanwhile, the tourism activity includes hotel and restaurant business. The LEK group believed that the soil material transported into the river is mostly coming from the forest-production area that has been converted into agriculture lands by local farmers (known as pesanggem). Usually, they grow rain fed vegetables such as carrot, potato, cabbage in the steep slopes without proper management. The group also thought that the conversion of forest into agriculture land will trigger landslide evidence on the steep slopes. They were quite sure that the absence of tree vegetation on the steep lands was the major cause of landslides and flooding. Actually, the perception of the PEK and MEK group on the erosion and landslide issues are not quite
different from LEK group. However, they emphasized that slope is more prominent factor triggering landslides than the absence of trees.</br></br>
Comparing the simulated discharge using the GenRiver model to the actual field measurement shows a poor relation. The measured discharge data collected by PJT 1 (Perum Jasa Tirta I) seems to have unexpected trends that cannot be explained well by the available supporting data such as rainfall data. However, the simulated discharge upon some landuse scenarios indicates some acceptable preferences compared to the actual field condition.</br></br>
In conclusion, the similarity of perception among stakeholders in the watershed will give
chance to find the best management plan and practices in the near future. But there is still a problem to bring the stakeholders to sit together discussing their opinion, perception and hope on the future of the watershed. An appropriate system and mechanism of coordination and communication among stakeholders is certainly needed to build better understanding of the watershed. Environmental service mechanism can be potentially developed in Sumber Brantas watershed, since the early initiative has been explored and practiced by some stakeholders, such as Perum Jasa Tirta I.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Environmental services, hydrological, modeling, local knowledge, watershed</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Widianto, Suprayogo D, Sudarto  and Lestariningsih ID. 2010. Implementasi Kaji Cepat Hidrologi (RHA) di Hulu DAS Brantas, Jawa Timur. Working paper nr.121. DOI: 10.5716/WP10338.PDFBogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 133 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2590</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>151</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0151-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>A Study of Rapid Hydrological Appraisal in the Krueng Peusangan Watershed, NAD, Sumatra</maintitle>
	<author>Ni'matul Khasanah, Elok Mulyoutami, Andree Ekadinata, Tonni Asmawan, Lisa Tanika, Zuraidah Said, Meine van Noordwijk and Beria Leimona</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper nr 123. DOI: 10.5716/WP10339.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>55</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The Krueng Peusangan Watershed is categorized as degraded area with 1st priority by the Department of Public Work and Water Resource Services of Aceh Province (Departemen Pekerjaan Umum dan Dinas Sumber Daya Air, Aceh province) meaning this watershed has experienced very severe degradation and needs high priority to improve its situation. The Aceh Provincial Government developed a strategic planning of integrated and sustainable watershed management of the Krueng Peusangan watershed to prevent further watershed degradation. Aligned to the development of the strategic planning, WWF in collaboration with the World Agroforestry Centre
(ICRAF) SEA Regional Program conducted a comprehensive hydrology study from the perspective of multiple stakeholders using the Rapid Hydrological Appraisal (RHA) method. </br></br>
The objectives of the RHA are to appraise the hydrological situation from the perspective of multiple stakeholders: local ecological knowledge (LEK), public/policymakers ecological knowledge (PEK), and hydrologist/modeler ecological knowledge (MEK). Further, the recommendation from the application of RHA is to design a realistic approach in designing a reward for watershed services scheme. To accomplish the objective of the study, the RHA method was implemented through the following activities:</br>
1. Survey and exploration of the two main types of stakeholder knowledge: local and
public/policy maker ecological knowledge on water movement and causes and
consequences of land use options on the landscape from the perspective of multiple users of the Krueng Peusangan watershed,
2. Gathering and analyzing of existing climate and hydrology data on the Krueng Peusangan watershed,
3. Spatial data analysis of the Krueng Peusangan watershed to obtain land cover information, land cover change information and watershed characteristic,
4. Analyses of the consequences of current land cover change on the values of water balance including river flow in the Krueng Peusangan watershed using GenRiver 2.0 model, and
5. Analyses of plausible future land cover changes scenarios and its impacts using GenRiver 2.0 model.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Khasanah N, Mulyoutami E, Ekadinata A, Asmawan T, Tanika L, Said Z, van Noordwijk M and Leimona B. 2011. A Study of Rapid Hydrological Appraisal in the Krueng PeusanganWatershed, NAD, Sumatra. Working Paper nr 123. DOI: 10.5716/WP10339.PDFBogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 55 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2589</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>150</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0150-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kaji Cepat Hidrologi di Daerah Aliran Sungai Krueng Peusangan, NAD, Sumatra</maintitle>
	<author>Ni'matul Khasanah, Elok Mulyoutami, Andree Ekadinata, Tonni Asmawan, Lisa Tanika, Zuraidah Said and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no. 122. DOI 10.5716/WP10337.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>55</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Krueng Peusangan merupakan DAS dalam kategori terdegradasi prioritas utama menurut data Departemen Pekerjaan Umum dan Dinas Sumber Daya Air Provinsi Aceh. Dengan kata lain, DAS Krueng Peusangan telah mengalami degradasi yang sangat parah dan berada pada prioritas tinggi untuk segera diperbaiki kondisinya. Pemerintah provinsi Aceh mengembangkan rencana strategis (RenStra) pengelolaan DAS Krueng Peusangan secara terpadu dan berkelanjutan untuk mencegah degradasi lebih lanjut. Terkait dengan pengembangan rencana tersebut, World Wildlife Funds (WWF) bekerjasama dengan World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) South East Asia regional programme untuk melakukan kajian hidrologi secara menyeluruh berdasarkan perspektif berbagai pemangku kepentingan dengan menggunakan metode Kaji Cepat Hidrologi/<i>Rapid Hydological Appraisal</i> (RHA).</br></br>
Tujuan RHA adalah untuk menilai situasi hidrologi DAS berdasarkan perspektif berbagai
pemangku kepentingan seperti pengetahuan ekologi masyarakat lokal (<i>local ecological knowledge/LEK</i>), pengetahuan ekologi pembuat keputusan (<i>policymakers ecological knowledge/PEK</i>) dan pengetahuan ekologi ahli hidrologi/peneliti (<i>hydrologist/modeler ecological knowledge/MEK</i>). Selanjutnya, rekomendasi hasil RHA digunakan untuk menyusun pendekatan skema imbal jasa lingkungan. Dalam kajian ini, implementasi RHA dilakukan melalui beberapa kegiatan:</br></br>
Kajian dan eksplorasi pengetahuan ekologi masyarakat lokal dan pengetahuan ekologi pembuat keputusan dengan fokus pergerakan air; penyebab dan konsekuensi pemilihan/perubahan penggunaan lahan di suatu bentang lahan (<i>lansekap</i>) menurut sudut pandang berbagai pihak pemanfaat DAS Krueng Peusangan,</br>
Pengumpulan dan analisa data iklim dan hidrologi DAS Krueng Peusangan,</br>
Analisa data spasial untuk memperoleh pemahaman mengenai perubahan tutupan lahan dan karakteristik DAS,</br>
Analisa pengaruh perubahan tutupan lahan terhadap kesetimbangan air termasuk debit sungai DAS Krueng Peusangan menggunakan model GenRiver 2.0, dan</br>
Analisa beberapa skenario perubahan tutupan lahan yang mungkin terjadi terhadap
kesetimbangan air menggunakan model GenRiver 2.0.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Khasanah N, Mulyoutami E, Ekadinata A, Asmawan T, Tanika L, Said Z and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Kaji Cepat Hidrologi di Daerah Aliran Sungai Krueng Peusangan, NAD, Sumatra. Working paper no. 122Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 55 p.</citation>
	<grp>TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2588</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>315</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0315-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rubber agroforestry and PES for preservation of biodiversity in Bungo district, Sumatra</maintitle>
	<author>Laxman Joshi, Rachman Pasha, Elok Mulyoutami and Hendrien J Beukema</author>
	<editor>Daniela Ottaviani and Nadia El-Hage Scialabba</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Payments for ecosystem services and food security</secondtitle>
	<publisher>FAO</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Rome, Italy</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>26</totalpages>
	<mainpages>114-135</mainpages>
	<descript1>ISBN 978-92-5-106796-3</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The introduction of the rubber tree (<i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>), naturally found in the floodplains forests along the Amazon River, began in Indonesia in the second half of the 19th century. In Sumatra and Borneo, rubber cultivation, initially restricted along rivers with good accessibility, rapidly spread to even relatively remote areas in the country. Currently, Indonesia is the world's second largest gum exporter with an overall rubber area of 3.5 million hectares. More than one million households depend on rubber-generating income in Indonesia, as 83 percent of the rubber cultivation area is constituted by smallholder rubber agroforestry systems (Wibawa <i>et al.</i>, 2005)</br></br>
Bungo district, located in the western area of the Jambi province, the third most important Indonesia province for rubber production, is surrounded by three national parks: Kerinci Seblat, Bukit Dua Belas and Bukit Tiga Puluh. The district has been severely deforested (60 percent forest loss) and forests have been replaced by rubber and oil palm plantations, as well as other agricultural land uses. In particular, from the late 1980s, an increased spread in oil plantation cultivation has led to the additional loss of native trees and simplification of the agro-ecological landscape (Fentreine <i>et al.</i>). A remote sensing study showed that in 1998 the remaining forests, mostly located on the Barisan range, covered only 28 percent of Bungo district, while in the area occupied by jungle rubber has decreased from 17 percent (1988) to 11 percent (2008) due to a parallel increase in monoculture covering from 23 percent (1988) to 49 percent (2008) of the district area (Ekadinata <i>et al.</i>, 2010)]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Joshi L, Pasha R, Mulyoutami E and Beukema HJ. 2011. Rubber agroforestry and PES for preservation of biodiversity in Bungo district, Sumatra. In: Ottaviani D and Scialabba NE,eds. Payments for ecosystem services and food security. Rome, Italy. : FAO. P. 114-135.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 2, GRP 6, RUPES</grp>
	<publicationid>2587</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>314</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0314-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>PES and multi-strata coffee gardens in Sumberjaya, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Rachman Pasha and Beria Leimona</author>
	<editor>Daniela Ottaviani and Nadia El-Hage Scialabba</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Payments for ecosystem services and food security</secondtitle>
	<publisher>FAO</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Rome, Italy</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>7</totalpages>
	<mainpages>275-281</mainpages>
	<descript1>ISBN 978-92-5-106796-3</descript1>
	<abstract>Sumberjaya is a sub-district (542 km2), in the district of West Lampung, which has historically been the dramatic scene of massive deforestation escalating in social conflicts and poor households. Since the 1970s, Sumberjaya recorded a rapid expansion in smallholder coffee cultivation. Although the government was aware of the consequent high uncontrolled deforestation rate, it was only in 1990, when a  hydropower plant was planned in the upper watershed of the Way Besai River, that it took action, concerned about slope erosion and potentially high sediment discharge to the hydropower plant (USAID, 2007). Thus, 40 percent of the land in Sumberjaya was declared as areas of restricted use and forest protection and, between 1991 and 1996, thousands of farmers were evicted from their lands. In 1998, a reconciliatory negotiation promoted by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), the local NGO Watala, the Ford Foundation and the UK Government's Department for International Development (DFID) was initiated to resolve the huge social conflict and promote sound land-use management.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Pasha R and Leimona B. 2011. PES and multi-strata coffee gardens in Sumberjaya, Indonesia. In: Ottaviani D and Scialabba NE,eds. Payments for ecosystem services and food security. Rome, Italy. : FAO. P. 275-281.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, RUPES</grp>
	<publicationid>2586</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>27</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0027-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia. Payments, compensation or co-investment?</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk and Beria Leimona</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Based on our action research in Asia in the Rewarding Upland Poor for Environmental Services they provide (RUPES) program since 2002, we examine three paradigms: ?Commoditized ES (CES)?, ?Compensation for Opportunities Skipped (COS)?, and ?Co-Investment in (Environmental) Stewardship (CIS)?. Among the RUPES action research sites, there are several examples of CIS, i.e. co-investment in and shared responsibility for stewardship, with a focus on ?assets? (natural + human + social capital) that can be expected to provide future flows of ES. CES, equivalent to a strict definition of PES, may
represent an abstraction rather than a current reality. COS is a challenge when the legality of opportunities to reduce ES is contested.</br></br>
The term ?payments for environmental services? has rapidly gained popularity, with
its focus on market-based mechanisms for enhancing environmental services.
Current use of the term, however, covers a broad spectrum of interactions between
environmental services? suppliers and beneficiaries.</br></br>
A broader class of mechanisms pursues enhancement of environmental services
through compensation or rewards. Such mechanisms can be analysed on the basis of
how they meet four conditions: realistic, conditional, voluntary and pro-poor.</br></br>
The Rewarding Upland Poor for Environmental Services (RUPES) program has been
examining such mechanisms throughout Asia since 2002.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M and Leimona B. 2011. Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia. Payments, compensation or co-investment?. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, RUPES</grp>
	<publicationid>2585</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>26</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0026-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Can rewards for providing environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona, Laxman Joshi and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>8</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Rewards for environmental services (RES) link global priorities on poverty reduction and environmental sustainability and are designed to balance effectiveness and
efficiency with fairness and propoor characteristics. This paper assesses some key issues associated with design and implementation of RES by developing and exploring
two propositions related to conditions required for RES to effectively contribute to poverty alleviation, and to preferred forms of pro- poor mechanisms.</br></br>
The concept of rewarding local people who protect the environment and the services
provides links to two global priorities: to reduce poverty and to sustain the environment.</br></br>
Pilot schemes based on the concept should ideally aim to balance effectiveness and
efficiency with fairness and supporting poor people.</br></br>
However, most tend to focus primarily on the efficiency of providing the environmental
services and often neglect the local people involved in managing the natural resources,
their livelihood strategies and the multi-dimensional nature of poverty.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B, Joshi L and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Can rewards for providing environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 8 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, RUPES</grp>
	<publicationid>2584</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>149</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0149-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the Quirino forest-carbon development project in Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Maria Noriza Herrera and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no. 132. DOI: 10.5716/WP11057.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>56</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The forest-carbon development project in Quirino covers the fragmented open forest patches within the Quirino Protected Landscape, which forms part of the Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor. This project is part of Conservation International Philippines (CI Philippines) effort in building alliances with local communities, the private sector, government agencies and NGOs to improve the management of the Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor and strengthen the enforcement of environmental laws.</br></br>
Acting as the project proponent and intermediary, CI Philippines can potentially institutionalise the project. Not only is such a purpose part of their mission as a non-government organization but also they have the technical capacity to do so. The project is to be implemented as community-based forest management, involving local communities (represented by three people?s organizations) made up of 96 individual and household landholders, Palacian Economic Development Association Inc (a local NGO), the provincial government, Department of Environment and Natural Resources Region 2 and the Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Office and the project monitoring team of CI Philippines. MoreTrees, a non-profit carbon offset provider, funds the project.</br></br>
A total of 177 ha, consisting of small landholdings (110 parcels) in five barangays within
the municipalities of Maddela (94 ha) and Nagtipunan (83 ha), has been delineated as the project area. The 108 parcels are within classified forestlands (162 ha) and most landholders have certificate of stewardship contracts as their tenure instruments; there are only two parcels of private land (15 ha) with ownership titles.</br></br>
The project deploys an agroforestation scheme, conducting reforestation activities by planting native tree species on a total of 155 ha and an agroforestry system by planting fruit trees on 22 ha.</br></br>
Just like other project proponents, CI Philippines also attempted to participate under the Clean Development Mechanism afforestation/reforestation (CDM A/R) framework. It initially drafted a plan for 13 000 ha as a CDM A/R project but is now targeting the Verified Carbon Standards. Validation by a third party has already been conducted under the Climate, Community and Biodiversity Standards after some corrective action, including revision of the project design document and subsequent revalidation.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Carbon market, climate change, forest-carbon development, mitigation, community-based forest management, Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor, Quirino forest carbon</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Herrera MN and Lasco RD. 2011. Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the Quirino forest-carbon development project in Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor. Working Paper no. 132. DOI: 10.5716/WP11057.PDFLos Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 56 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2583</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>148</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0148-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the Laguna Lake Development Authority?s forest-carbon development project</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Liberty O. Moya and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no. 131. DOI: 10.5716/WP11056.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>43</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Laguna de Bay is one of the most vital inland bodies of water in the Philippines. It is
surrounded by 24 sub-watersheds with an aggregate area of 2920 km2. The Laguna de Bay watershed is considered a priority watershed for environmental sustainability. It was originally covered by dense tropical forest but was estimated in 2010 to have less than 5% forest cover. The area is characterised by grasslands, brush and abandoned agricultural areas that have less than 10% tree cover, thus, considered a priority for rehabilitation</br></br>
The Laguna Lake Development Authority?s carbon-forestry project, called the Laguna de Bay Community Watershed Rehabilitation Project, consists of two components: 1) Project 1, which covers an aggregate of 140 ha over 10 barangays within the Caliraya-Lumot Watershed. This is further subdivided into two sites (site 1 = 40 ha and site 2 = 100 ha); and 2) Project 2, which covers an aggregate of 217 ha located in four sites in Laguna province. Each site is equivalent to a small-scale forest-carbon project bundled into one project</br></br>
The project aims to develop an enabling environment for a carbon market for small-scale environmental interventions in the Laguna de Bay watershed. The key activities of the project are designed to: a) build the capacity of the Authority as an intermediary; b) pilot the implementation of carbon emissions reduction projects; and c) prepare set environmental projects for emission reduction credits.</br></br>
The project has the participation of local government units (Municipality of Tanay and
Siniloan), an academic institution (University of Philippines Los Baos), a governmentcontrolled corporation (National Power Corporation) and private companies (CBK Power Company and San Pablo Water District), which have jurisdiction at each site to facilitate the project.</br></br>
As intermediary, the Authority was able to receive funding through a grant from the Japan Climate Change Initiative, which the World Bank implements for purchasing offsets for greenhouse gas emission reductions from small-scale Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects. Carbon financing is already mainstreamed in the project, which enabled the Authority to prepare a project design document following the CDM standard template. However, when submitted for validation, of the sites proposed for the forest-carbon development project, only one site?5 ha located in the municipality of Siniloan?satisfied the eligibility criteria under the CDM afforestation/reforestation framework.</br></br>
While continuing their reforestation activities, the Authority is currently looking for
additional sites. The project design document is being revised and other market mechanisms are being explored.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>carbon forestry, forest-carbon development, watershed rehabilitation, agroforestation, Laguna de Bay, CDM A/R</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Moya LO and Lasco RD. 2011. Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the Laguna Lake Development Authority’s forest-carbon development project. Working Paper no. 131. DOI: 10.5716/WP11056.PDFLos Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 43 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2582</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>147</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0147-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the Ikalahan Ancestral Domain forest-carbon development</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Emma Abasolo and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no. 133</edition>
	<totalpages>41</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The proposed forest carbon development project in the Ikalahan Ancestral Domain aims to improve the environmental and natural resource management of watersheds in Kalahan and lead to participation in the carbon and environmental services markets. This will be done by converting 900 ha of marginal, abandoned agricultural land to productive tree-based systems, improving the livelihoods of communities through agroforestry and protecting the watershed, enhancing biodiversity and improving the aesthetic values of the landscape for potential tourism.</br></br>
The World Agroforestry Centre Philippines has assisted the Ikalahan, the indigenous people of the region, through their Kalahan Educational Foundation (KEF) by building their capacity to enter into the international carbon markets. KEF initially planned to participate in the market through the United Nations? Framework Convention on Climate Change?s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) then later through the Verified Carbon Standards and is now exploring the possibility of engaging with the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation plus conservation (REDD+) scheme.</br></br>
The study was conducted to assess the potential of, and challenges for, the proposed project to participate in carbon trading and rewards for environmental services mechanisms. We wanted to examine the strengths of the proposed forest-carbon development as well as the limitations that are hindering its institutionalisation.</br></br>
The project will consist of an agroforestation scheme on 900 ha, through 1) planting purely forest trees for reforestation and greater carbon sequestration; and 2) agroforestry farms for livelihoods and lesser carbon sequestration. Total sequestration has been estimated at 89 776 t CO2e over 20 years. The project implementers are the local indigenous people, represented by the KEF.</br></br>
The prerequisite for any project activity is identification of the area. However, as of 2010, KEF had been able to delineate only 17 parcels of land with aggregate area of 112.27 ha, which is intended for forest tree establishment. The parcels for agroforestry farms had not yet been identified.</br></br>
Further, KEF had yet to create a comprehensive project plan and prepare a project design document (PDD) following the standard templates required for the carbon markets. KEF needs strategic partners to help them do this, along with the required documents for environmental services registration and crediting. A one-year agreement with Mitsubishi UFJ Securities Co. Ltd. to provide consultancy services to help KEF with such activities had already expired.</br></br>
We found that aside from the technical limitations of undertaking the planning process, the process of identifying the project area still remained a challenge for the KEF.</br></br>
Generally, progress has only stemmed from the assistance provided by the World
Agroforestry Centre Philippines through its Rewarding Upland Poor for Environmental
Services (RUPES) project.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Ikalahan Ancestral Domain, forest carbon, RUPES project, agroforestation, CDM, voluntary carbon market, REDD+ mechanism</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Abasolo E and Lasco RD. 2011. Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and
challenges: the Ikalahan Ancestral Domain forest-carbon development. Working Paper no. 133Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 41 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2581</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>146</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0146-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the case of the Arakan Forest Corridor forest carbon project</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Jayson C. Ibañez and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no. 130. DOI: 10.5716/WP11055.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>50</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The proposed forest-carbon development project in the Arakan Forest Corridor initially was planned to participate in the carbon market under the United Nations Clean Development Mechanism afforestation/reforestation component, with a total area of 3000 ha. Currently, the proponent is exploring participation in the voluntary carbon market. The project will implement an agroforestation scheme to rehabilitate 216 ha of denuded/degraded portions within the Corridor. A ?community-based conservation? approach will be adopted. The representative people?s organizations (Nagkahiusang Manobo sa Datu Ladayon, Pauangdig Lumadnong Panaghiusa sa Arakan, Tumandig Lumadnong Panaghiusa and Kiandang Farmer?s Association), tribal and migrant communities of Arakan that cover the area signed a binding contract called a Conservation Agreement for partnership with the Philippine Eagle Foundation and a separate Rainforestation Agreement as individual or household landholders.
Incentives will be provided to the participating people?s organizations and to each landholder from innovative funding sources. The Adopt a Parcel of Hope campaign is the fundraising vehicle, seeking funding from the private sector through corporate social responsibility mechanisms for every hectare (or parcel).</br></br>
The proposed project can potentially contribute to mitigation efforts through carbon
sequestration and storage. However, there are many challenges for project development and field implementation. Realistic work and budget plans need to be prepared and the technical and socio-economic aspects of the field work must be sustainable.</br></br>
Smallholders? acceptance of the arrangements and continued cooperation is vital for the
project?s success. To ensure this, more ground work needs to be done to facilitate
implementation in the field. A more pro-active project design must be developed using
adaptive management theory and subsequently implemented. Adaptive management uses management intervention as a tool to strategically probe the functioning of an ecosystem.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Forest carbon development, Arakan Forest Corridor, agroforestation,
rainforestation farming, community-based conservation, project development approach,
Adopt a Parcel of Hope campaign</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Ibañez JC and Lasco RD. 2011. Carbon forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the case of the Arakan Forest Corridor forest carbon project. Working Paper no. 130Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 50. DOI: 10.5716/WP11055.PDF p. DOI: 10.5716/WP11055.PDF</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2580</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>148</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0148-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Membangun Kebun Campuran: Belajar dari Kobun Pocal di Tapanuli dan Lampoeh di Tripa</maintitle>
	<author>Endri Martini, Hesti L. Tata, Elok Mulyoutami, Jusupta Tarigan and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>42</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Martini E, Tata HL, Mulyoutami E, Tarigan J and Rahayu S. 2010. Membangun Kebun Campuran: Belajar dari Kobun Pocal di Tapanuli dan Lampoeh di Tripa. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 42 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2579</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>145</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0145-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the case of Mt Kitanglad Range forest-carbon development project</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Felix S Mirasol and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no 129. DOI: 10.5716/WP11054.PDF</edition>
	<totalpages>51</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The proposed Mt Kitanglad Range forest-carbon development project aims to allow participation in the carbon market by increasing the permanent forest cover of the Mt Kitanglad Range National Park (?the Park?) by reforesting the grassland areas within its buffer zone. The project will enhance the ecological services of the Park while promoting socio-economic development activities for the forest occupants who depend on marginal agricultural cultivation within the Park. The project proposes an agroforestation scheme on 300.34 hectare as a carbon forestry project initiative. This is
made up of 198.29 hectare of purely forest trees as permanent protection forest and 102.05 hectare of agroforestry farm development to support the livelihoods, food sources and timber needs of participating landholders.</br></br>
The study was conducted to assess the potential of, and challenges for, the proposed project to participate in carbon trading and rewards for environmental services mechanisms. One of the key strengths was the political will of the intermediary entity in helping the project participants, the occupants of deforested and degraded land. This manifested in the formulation of the project development plan.</br></br>
The proposed project can potentially participate in the carbon market. There are constraints, but with the necessary technical and logistical support to achieve a final project proposal and/or project design document and subsequent operations, the Mt Kitanglad Range forest-carbon development project could potentially be a viable participant in the carbon trading and environmental services rewards mechanisms.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Carbon market, climate change, forest-carbon development, mitigation, Mt Kitanglad Range, agroforestation scheme</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Mirasol FS and Lasco RD. 2011. Carbon-forestry projects in the Philippines: potential and challenges: the case of Mt Kitanglad Range forest-carbon development project. Working Paper no 129Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 51 p. DOI: 10.5716/WP11054.PDF</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2578</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>25</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0025-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Management of Sesaot Forest: Quo Vadis?</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Polan Brief no. 13</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Sesaot forest lies within Dodokan catchment, to the west of Rinjani National
Park with an area of 5,950 ha. Administratively, the forest belongs to
Narmada and Lingsar districts of West Lombok Regency and surrounded
by 4 villages of Sesaot, Lebah Sempage, Sedau and Batu Mekar. According
to Decree of Agriculture Minister No. 756/Kpts/Um/1982, the status and
function of Sesaot forest is Protective Forest. This status is based on the
important function of the forest as part of the catchment that provides water
for large scale irrigation and drinking water for downstream communities,
particularly the citizen of Mataram in West Lombok Regency and some areas
in Central Lombok Regency.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Galudra G. 2011. Management of Sesaot Forest: Quo Vadis?. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2577</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>24</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0024-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rencana tata ruang wilayah dan distribusi manfaat sumberdaya hutan</maintitle>
	<author>Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Polan Brief no. 12</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) merupakan salah satu atau
bahkan satu-satunya peluang untuk mencapai pembangunan
rendah emisi. Sebagai suatu institusi (rule of game), RTRW tidak
terlepas dari permasalahan mendasar yang melandasi proses
pembentukannya. Hal inilah yang membuat RTRW sebagai suatu
dokumen legal sering kali gagal menjadi acuan pembangunan
daerah. RTRW tidak hanya sebatas legalisasi pemanfaatan dan
pembagian ruang atas sumberdaya alam (SDA) namun lebih dari itu,
karena pada setiap sumber daya alam melekat hak yang berbeda
atas manfaat yang berbeda-beda pula. Tulisan ini merupakan
opini penulis sebagai suatu identifikasi awal dalam memahami
permasalahan distribusi manfaat sumberdaya hutan dan lahan
didalam RTRW Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat (Tanjab Barat) dan
kebijakan kehutanan pada umumnya. Cara pandang Teori Akses
digunakan untuk menguraikan alokasi dan distribusi manfaat
sumberdaya hutan dan lahan untuk menuju pembangunan
rendah emisi.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Agung P. 2011. Rencana tata ruang wilayah dan distribusi manfaat sumberdaya hutan. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2576</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>147</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0147-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Analisa gaya bersengketa (AGATA); Panduan ringkas untuk membantu memilih bentuk penyelesaian sengketa pengelolaan sumberdaya alam</maintitle>
	<author>Gamal Pasya and Martua T Sirait</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>The Samdhana Institute</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>84</totalpages>
	<descript3>9780-979-170173-1-0</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Sengketa sumber daya alam merupakan suatu hal yang sejak lama cenderung diabaikan. Hal tersebut umumnya merupakan peninggalan masalah di negara negara <i> post colonial <\i> yang secara historis mewarisi legasi dan permasalahan sengketa penguasaan atas sumber daya alam. Sengketa tersebut amat nyata menjadi hambatan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam yang adil dan lestari, serta perlu segera diselesaikan untuk menghindari bumi dari kelanjutan bencana sosial dan ekologis, dan sepatutnya hal tersebut diselesaikan oleh masyarakat, pemerintah dan para pihak lainnya. Di Indonesia TAP MPR No. IX tahun 2001 tentang Pembaruan Agraria dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam memandatkan dan menugaskan kepada Pemerintah dan DPR untuk menyelesaikan sengketa secara adil dan beradab sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip yang ada dalam TAP MPR tersebut]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Pasya G and Sirait MT. 2011. Analisa gaya bersengketa (AGATA); Panduan ringkas untuk membantu memilih bentuk penyelesaian sengketa pengelolaan sumberdaya alam. Bogor, Indonesia. : The Samdhana Institute. 84 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, POLAN</grp>
	<publicationid>2575</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>48</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0048-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>GenRiver and FlowPer: Generic River Flow Persistence Models. User Manual Version 2.0</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Rudy Harto Widodo, Ai Farida, Desi Ariyadhi Suyamto, Betha Lusiana, Lisa Tanika and Ni'matul Khasanah</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>119</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-50-7</descript3>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Widodo RH, Farida A, Suyamto DA, Lusiana B, Tanika L and Khasanah N. 2011. GenRiver and FlowPer: Generic River Flow Persistence Models. User Manual Version 2.0. Bogor. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 119 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2574</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>23</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0023-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Meso Debat: Menghubungkan Debat Makro dan Mikro dalam Menyiapkan Strategi REDD Daerah</maintitle>
	<author>Martua T Sirait and Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Policy Analysis Unit Brief No. 11</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Sirait MT and Agung P. 2011. Meso Debat: Menghubungkan Debat Makro dan Mikro dalam Menyiapkan Strategi REDD Daerah. Policy Analysis Unit Brief No. 11. Bogor. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2573</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>22</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0022-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Menuju Pengakuan ?Hutan Nagari? di Nagari Salingka Danau Singkarak</maintitle>
	<author>Jomi Suhendri and Putra Agung</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Policy Analysis Unit Brief No. 10</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Suhendri J and Agung P. 2011. Menuju Pengakuan “Hutan Nagari” di Nagari Salingka Danau Singkarak. Policy Analysis Unit Brief No. 10. Bogor. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2572</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>273</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0273-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Stakeholder perspectives on ?fair and efficient? benefit distribution along the CREDD value chain</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, S. Suyanto, Sandra J.Velarde, Herry Purnomo, Do Trong Hoan and Hoang Minh Ha</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>67</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Suyanto S, Velarde SJ, Purnomo H, Do Trong H and Hoang MH. Stakeholder perspectives on ‘fair and efficient’ benefit distribution along the CREDD value chain. Bogor. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 67 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2571</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>272</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0272-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Local perspectives on REDD in comparison with those at the international negotiation tables and their representation in quantitative scenario models</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Gamma Galudra, Ratna Akiefnawati, Grace B.Villamor, Herry Purnomo and S. Suyanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>93</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Galudra G, Akiefnawati R, Villamor GB, Purnomo H and Suyanto S. Local perspectives on REDD in comparison with those at the international negotiation tables and their representation in quantitative scenario models. Bogor. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 93 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2570</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>271</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0271-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Abatement Cost Curves Relating Past Greenhouse Gas Emissions To The Economic Gains They Allowed</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Sonya Dewi, S. Suyanto, Peter A Minang, Douglas White, Valentina Robiglio, Hoang Minh Ha, Andree Ekadinata, Rachmat Mulia and Degi Harja</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>28</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Dewi S, Suyanto S, Minang PA, White D, Robiglio V, Hoang MH, Ekadinata A, Mulia R and Harja D. Abatement Cost Curves Relating Past Greenhouse Gas Emissions To The Economic Gains They Allowed. Bogor. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2011. 28 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2569</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>313</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0313-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Adaptation in China</maintitle>
	<author>Zhang Linxiu, Yi Hongmei, Luo Renfu, Wang Jinxia and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Climate Change Challenges in the Mekong Region</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Chiang Mai</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>324</totalpages>
	<mainpages>77-109</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Zhang L, Yi H, Renfu L, Wang J and Xu Jianchu . 2011. The Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Adaptation in China. Climate Change Challenges in the Mekong Region. Chiang Mai. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. P. 77-109.</citation>
	<publicationid>2568</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>312</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0312-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The impact of climate change on water resources and local livelihood in the Asian highlands</maintitle>
	<author>Xu Jianchu</author>
	<editor>Kobkun Rayanakorn</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Climate Change Challenges in the Mekong Region</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Chiang Mai</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>324</totalpages>
	<mainpages>9-33</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Xu Jianchu. 2011. The impact of climate change on water resources and local livelihood in the Asian highlands. In: Rayanakorn K,eds. Climate Change Challenges in the Mekong Region. Chiang Mai. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. P. 9-33.</citation>
	<publicationid>2566</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>144</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0144-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Agricultural Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: What can we learn for the MRV of agricultural NAMAs?</maintitle>
	<author>Andreas Wilkes, Wang Shiping, Timm Tennigkeit and Feng Jiexi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<edition>WP no. 126</edition>
	<totalpages>17</totalpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Wilkes A, Shiping W, Tennigkeit T and Feng J. 2011. Agricultural Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: What can we learn for the MRV of agricultural NAMAs?. WP no. 126: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 17 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2565</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>38</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BL0038-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Bersama Menjaga Hutan: Upaya Mengurangi Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi di Desa Lubuk Beringin</maintitle>
	<author>Ratna Akiefnawati, Grace B.Villamor, Farid Zulfikar, Iman Budisetiawan, Elok Mulyoutami, Asep Ayat and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>68</totalpages>
	<descript3>978-979-3198-51-4</descript3>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Akiefnawati R, Villamor GB, Zulfikar F, Budisetiawan I, Mulyoutami E, Ayat A and van Noordwijk M. Bersama Menjaga Hutan: Upaya Mengurangi Emisi dari Deforestasi dan Degradasi di Desa Lubuk Beringin. Bogor. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 68 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2564</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>146</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0146-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Participatory Agroforestry Development in DPR Korea</maintitle>
	<editor>Xu Jianchu, Kim Gwang Ju and Jun He</editor>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Kunming</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>240</totalpages>
	<descript3>978 92-9059-209-7</descript3>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>2011. Participatory Agroforestry Development in DPR Korea. Kunming. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 240 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2563</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>405</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0405-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Is native timber tree intercropping an economically feasible alternative for smallholder farmers in the Philippines?</maintitle>
	<author>Fernando Santos Martin and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<volume>55</volume>
	<mainpages>257–272</mainpages>
	<abstract>Integration of trees on upland farms in the Philippines has been slower than expected
and desirable from an environmental perspective. Our economic and risk analysis
points to current policies as part of the problem. The study compares three domesticated indigenous timber trees (Shorea contorta V., Pterocarpus indicus J., and Vitex parviflora W.) intercropped with maize against a benchmark of the widely used exotic mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla K.). We used a biophysical simulation model
(WaNuLCAS 3.1) to represent interaction between trees and crops for a fundamental
level of water, nutrient and light capture as the basis for production functions. External
conditions affecting systems profitability were accounted for in the Policy Analysis
Matrix (PAM). Elements of risk were introduced through Monte Carlo simulation.
Study results revealed that from a farmer?s perspective intercropping systems provide
similar (within an uncertainty range of + or ) 10%) returns to monocropping scenarios.
When net subsidies and taxes are accounted for, social profitability evaluations
favour tree intercropping at high tree densities. The net effect of the current bias in
price policies towards food production therefore refrains farmers from making decisions
to integrate trees on farms; a decision that is actually in the national interest on
economic grounds, even without consideration of positive environmental effects</abstract>
	<keywords>agricultural policy, agricultural systems, development economics, economic and
risk analysis, productivity analysis</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Martin FS and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Is native timber tree intercropping an economically feasible alternative for smallholder farmers in the Philippines?. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 55: P. 257–272.</citation>
	<publicationid>2562</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>404</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0404-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Understanding forest transition in the Philippines: main farm-level factors influencing smallholder?s capacity and intention to plant native timber trees</maintitle>
	<author>Fernando Santos Martin, Manuel Bertomeu, Meine van Noordwijk and R. M. Navarro-Cerrillo</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Small-scale Forestry</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<volume>DOI 10.1007/s11842-011-9166-y</volume>
	<abstract>The ?when, where and how? of decisions by smallholder upland farmers
to plant trees as part of their use of natural, human and capital resources needs to be
understood if policy support is to result in actual recovery of tree cover as part of a
?forest transition? trajectory. In large parts of the Philippines the turning point may
be close. Data on resource access and tree planting decisions were gathered from a
household survey, with a total of 148 respondents in four rural communities in
Leyte Province in Central Philippines. Data were analysed using logistic regression
analysis. Household-level results reveal that the outcomes of the decision-making
processes primarily depend on the availability of land and access to remaining forest
resources rather than socio-cultural or economic factors. The total area of land and
number of parcels managed by the household plus security of land tenure through
ownership was found to have a statistically significant effect on farmers? decision to
plant native timber trees. Access to surrounding natural forest is negatively associated
with farmer tree planting</abstract>
	<keywords>Agroforestation, Upland farmers, Household survey, Land management, Natural forest</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Martin FS, Bertomeu M, van Noordwijk M and Navarro-Cerrillo RM. 2011. Understanding forest transition in the Philippines: main farm-level factors influencing smallholder’s capacity and intention to plant native timber trees. Small-scale Forestry. DOI 10.1007/s11842-011-9166-y: P. .</citation>
	<publicationid>2561</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>143</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0143-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Payments for Environmental Services (PES): An introductory note in the Mekong context</maintitle>
	<author>Jun He, X. Lu and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>M-power PN67</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<edition>PN67_2010_28</edition>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>He J, Lu X and Xu Jianchu . 2010. Payments for Environmental Services (PES): An introductory note in the Mekong context. M-power PN67. PN67_2010_28: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. </citation>
	<publicationid>2560</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>142</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0142-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Insights from Kejie Watershed, Yunnan Province, southwest China</maintitle>
	<author>Jun He, Xu Jianchu and X Ma</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>M-Power, PN67 Working Paper</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<edition>PN67_2010_01</edition>
	<region>China</region>
	<citation>He J, Xu Jianchu  and Ma X. 2010. Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Insights from Kejie Watershed, Yunnan Province, southwest China. M-Power, PN67 Working Paper. PN67_2010_01: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. </citation>
	<publicationid>2558</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>403</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0403-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Variations of fruit and seed traits of natural and artificial populations in Camellia reticulata L.</maintitle>
	<author>Jiacong Huang, Jun He, Rui-ping Yin, Xiao-jun Wan, Jun Guo, Xin Cheng-lian, Faping Gong and Yue Li</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Journal of Beijing Forestry University</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<volume>32(5)</volume>
	<mainpages>94-101</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>Chinese</language>
	<citation>Huang J, He J, Yin R, Wan X, Guo J, Xin C, Gong F and Li Y. 2010. Variations of fruit and seed traits of natural and artificial populations in Camellia reticulata L.. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 32(5): P. 94-101.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2557</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>402</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0402-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Production Increasing Technology of Wild Thelepora Ganbajun Zang in Changning County</maintitle>
	<author>Qu Chun-xia, He Jun, Yang Yanping, Yang Hui-xian, Xiong Jian and Li Hong-wei</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Forest Inventory and Planning</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<volume>35(5)</volume>
	<mainpages>53-56</mainpages>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>Chinese</language>
	<citation>Qu C, He J, Yanping Y, Yang H, Xiong J and Li H. 2010. Production Increasing Technology of Wild Thelepora Ganbajun Zang in Changning County. Forest Inventory and Planning. 35(5): P. 53-56.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2556</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>401</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0401-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>GIS-base DSS for Optimal Multiobjectives Erosion Management: A case study of the Huai Talupkup Watershed, Thailand</maintitle>
	<author>S. Pongsai, Pratap Shresta, Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt, R. Clemente, N.K. Tripathi, V. Trelo-Ges and S. Paramee</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle> International Journal of Geoinformatics</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre  (ICRAF) Thailand</publisher>
	<volume>6 (3)</volume>
	<mainpages>67-78</mainpages>
	<region>Thailand</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Pongsai S, Shresta P, Schmidt-Vogt D, Clemente R, Tripathi N, Trelo-Ges V and Paramee S. 2010. GIS-base DSS for Optimal Multiobjectives Erosion Management: A case study of the Huai Talupkup Watershed, Thailand.  International Journal of Geoinformatics. 6 (3): P. 67-78.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 4</grp>
	<publicationid>2555</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>400</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0400-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>People?s perception and socioeconomic determinants of soil erosion: a case study of Samanalawewa Watershed, Sri Lanka</maintitle>
	<author> E.P.N. Udayakumara, Pratap Shresta, L. Samarakoon and Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Journal of Sediment Research</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<volume>25 (4)</volume>
	<mainpages>323-339</mainpages>
	<abstract>Though soil erosion is an important concern in Sri Lanka, there is a dearth of baseline information on soil erosion in many of its watersheds, which obstructs monitoring of soil erosion and mitigating its effects. In order to assess soil erosion in a critical watershed and to identify its determinants, the Samanalawewa watershed, which contains one of the main hydropower generating reservoirs in Sri Lanka, was selected for this study. Remote-sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) based modeling as well as field experiments were employed to assess and map soil erosion rates. Results indicated that the current rate of soil erosion ranges from 0 to 289 t/ha/yr, and that the average rate of soil erosion has been declining from 20 to 4 t/ha/yr over a period from 1986 to 2008. The current rate of soil erosion is, however, still about 14 to 33 times greater than the natural soil generation rate. Socioeconomic factors and peoples? perception of soil erosion and soil conservation measures were examined using data collected through a household survey. Multiple regression analysis with eighteen covariates of socioeconomic characteristics yielded eleven socioeconomic variables, viz. household size, farm labor, education, land tenure, conservation cost, training,
committee membership, professional competencies, income, distance, and financial capital as the predictor variables of soil erosion. Farmers identified improper soil and crop management practices as the major causes of erosion. The adoption of conservation measures, their effectiveness, and their impact on ecosystem services were also examined.</abstract>
	<keywords>Soil erosion, People perception, Determinants of soil erosion, Conservation measures,
Sri Lanka</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Udayakumara  E, Shresta P, Samarakoon L and Schmidt-Vogt D. 2010. People’s perception and socioeconomic determinants of soil erosion: a case study of Samanalawewa Watershed, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Sediment Research. 25 (4): P. 323-339.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 4</grp>
	<publicationid>2554</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>399</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0399-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Calibration and validation of MUSLE for estimating sediment yield on sloping plots: a case study in Khun Satan catchment of Northern Thailand</maintitle>
	<author>S. Pongsai, Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt, Pratap Shresta, R. Clemente and A. Eiumnoh</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Canadian Journal of Soil Science</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre  (ICRAF) Thailand</publisher>
	<volume>Vol. 90 (4)</volume>
	<mainpages>585-596</mainpages>
	<region>Thailand</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Pongsai S, Schmidt-Vogt D, Shresta P, Clemente R and Eiumnoh A. 2010. Calibration and validation of MUSLE for estimating sediment yield on sloping plots: a case study in Khun Satan catchment of Northern Thailand. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. Vol. 90 (4): P. 585-596.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 4</grp>
	<publicationid>2552</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>421</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0421-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Winter and spring warming result in delayed spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau</maintitle>
	<author>Yu Haiying, Eike Luedeling and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<editor>F. Stuart Chapin</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA (PNAS)</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The National Academy of Sciences of the USA</publisher>
	<volume>107</volume>
	<edition>51</edition>
	<totalpages>22151-22156</totalpages>
	<mainpages>22151–22156</mainpages>
	<abstract>Climate change has caused advances in spring phases of many plant
species. Theoretically, however, strong warming in winter could
slowthe fulfillment of chilling requirements,whichmay delay spring
phenology. This phenomenon should be particularly pronounced in
regions that are experiencing rapid temperature increases and are
characterized by highly temperature-responsive vegetation. To test
this hypothesis, we used the Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index ratio method to determine the beginning, end, and length of
the growing season of meadow and steppe vegetation of the
Tibetan Plateau in Western China between 1982 and 2006.We then
correlated observed phenological dates with monthly temperatures
for the entire period on record. For both vegetation types, spring
phenology initially advanced, but started retreating in the mid-1990s
in spite of continued warming. Together with an advancing end of
the growing season for steppe vegetation, this led to a shortening
of the growing period. Partial least-squares regression indicated
that temperatures in both winter and spring had strong effects on
spring phenology. Although warm springs led to an advance of the
growing season, warm conditions in winter caused a delay of the
spring phases. This delay appeared to be related to later fulfillment
of chilling requirements. Because most plants from temperate and
cold climates experience a period of dormancy in winter, it seems
likely that similar effects occur in other environments. Continued
warming may strengthen this effect and attenuate or even reverse
the advancing trend in spring phenology that has dominated
climate-change responses of plants thus far.</abstract>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Haiying Y, Luedeling E and Xu Jianchu . 2010. Winter and spring warming result in delayed spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau. In: Chapin FS,eds. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA (PNAS). 107(51):P. 22151–22156.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2551</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>396</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0396-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pursuits of adaptiveness in the shared rivers of Monsoon Asia</maintitle>
	<author>Louis Lebel, Xu Jianchu, Ram C. Bastakoti and Amrita Lamba</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Environmental Agreements</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<volume>DOI 10.1007/s10784-010-9141-7</volume>
	<mainpages>355-375</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[How water should be managed in Monsoon Asia is emerging as one of the core
earth system governance challenges. In this article, we explore the politics around pursuits of adaptiveness in water management, emphasizing the major transboundary river basins draining the south and eastern Himalayas. We look at two main functions: storing, diverting and sharing water for periods of scarcity; protecting people and places from destructive floods. We find that the pursuit of adaptiveness will take place partly outside the range of human experience in a context of large differences in exposure and vulnerabilities, disparate interests and unequal power. Anticipatory policies and actions to adapt and improve adaptive capacity to the transboundary impacts of changes in water-use, landuse and climate on water resources and services are still in their infancy; but several problem-framing discourses are emerging that have longer-term implications for water governance. It is not yet clear how these competing policy-frames will evolve in Asia. Much will depend on how systems of water governance develop. Public scrutiny of how governments in Asia plan to adapt to climate change in the water sector?on how risks of not enough and too much water are dealt with?will need to continue to help sort out those projects and strategies which are driven primarily by political benefits from those which actually contribute to building adaptive capacities and maintaining social-ecological resilience.
<br/>
DOI 10.1007/s10784-010-9141-7]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Climate change, Water governance, Monsoon Asia, Transboundary rivers</keywords>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Lebel L, Xu Jianchu , Bastakoti R and Lamba A. 2010. Pursuits of adaptiveness in the shared rivers of Monsoon Asia. International Environmental Agreements. DOI 10.1007/s10784-010-9141-7: P. 355-375.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2550</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>47</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0047-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kiprah Agroforestry 8</maintitle>
	<author>Anang Setiawan, Andree Ekadinata, Arif Rahmanulloh, Asep Ayat, Feri Johana, Geoffrey Kamadi, Kurniatun Hairiah, Muhammad Sofiyuddin, Pratiknyo Purnomosidhi and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<edition>4</edition>
	<mainpages>1-16</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Membangun kebun bibit unggul: Sarana untuk meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat
<br/>
Membangun perencanaan wilayah partisipatif di Kabupaten Aceh Barat
<br/>
Pelatihan penilaian Keanekaragaman Hayati bagi peneliti-peneliti muda Asia Pasifik
<br/>
Memanen gula kelapa di lahan Agroforestri
<br/>
Menanam pohon di luar kawasan hutan: dapatkah menjawab isu perubahan iklim?
<br/>
REDD+ di Berau: Melacak emisi menimbang implikasi]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Setiawan A, Ekadinata A, Rahmanulloh A, Ayat A, Johana F, Kamadi G, Hairiah K, Sofiyuddin M, Purnomosidhi P and Dewi S. 2011. Kiprah Agroforestry 8. In: Rahayu S, Tarigan J and Mulyoutami E,eds. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<publicationid>2549</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>21</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0021-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Institutionalising emissions reduction as part of sustainable development planning at national and sub-national levels in Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi, S. Suyanto and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ALLREDDI Brief 04</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The success of climate-change mitigation actions is to be measured by the reduced emissions. The fulfilment of the commitment made by the Indonesian President of 26% reduction unilaterally plus an additional 15% through international support by 2020 can only be judged from the amount of emissions reduced by 2020 and the achievement of 7% economic growth.<br/>
2. Demonstrated emission reduction has to be attributable to the source of funding because of the political and socio-economical implications attached. Achieving unsupported emission reduction will position Indonesia as a true leader in climate-change mitigation. The outcome of internationally supported emission reductions will have implications for international mechanisms while the remaining emission reduction
that can be traded will bring a significant economic benefit.<br/>
3. Forest products and land resources are sources of income and rural livelihoods. There are national and sub-national sustainable-development targets, some of which depend on forest products and/or land resources.<br/>
4. There are 'low-hanging fruit', especially related to unsustainable practices, which can reduce emissions without limiting opportunities to generate income and improve livelihoods, but there are also significant portions of emissions that are associated with some economic benefit and a smaller portion associated with high economic benefit. These issues cause variability in emissions reductions across landscapes.<br/>
5. The allocation of emission reduction targets for each sub-national level (province, district) should follow the 'fairness and efficiency' principle: 'efficiency' in terms of
how much change in emission practices and 'fairness' in terms of rewards for those actually protecting the forest.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S, Suyanto S and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Institutionalising emissions reduction as part of sustainable development planning at national and sub-national levels in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<grp>ALLREDDI</grp>
	<publicationid>2548</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>20</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0020-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Estimating losses in aboveground carbon stock from land-use and land-cover changes in Indonesia (1990, 2000, 2005)</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ALLREDDI Brief 03</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Indonesia is one of the biggest greenhouse gas emitters in the world and more than half of the emissions come from the land use, land cover and forestry (LULUCF) sector<br/>
The Government of Indonesia has declared its commitment to unilaterally reduce emissions by 26% by 2020 and by a further 15% with international support. More than 50% of the reduction is to come from LULUCF<br/>
Reducing uncertainties in the quantification of past emissions from LULUCF at disaggregated, sub-national levels are instrumental in establishing reference emission levels. Identification of dominant sources and drivers of LULUCF at sub-national level is necessary for developing local strategies to reduce emissions<br/>
Through the Accountability and Local Level Initiative for Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (ALLREDDI) project, two basic data required for calculating greenhouse gas emissions were produced and processed: (1) activity data from spatially explicit, nationwide, land-use and land-cover change analysis; and (2) emission factors for forests across Indonesia derived from the National Forest
Inventory (NFI) database and of other land-use and land-cover types from various databases]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A and Dewi S. 2011. Estimating losses in aboveground carbon stock from land-use and land-cover changes in Indonesia (1990, 2000, 2005). Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<grp>ALREDDI</grp>
	<publicationid>2547</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>19</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0019-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Forest carbon-stock estimates based on National Forest Inventory data</maintitle>
	<author>Degi Harja, Sonya Dewi, FX Heryawan and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ALLREDDI Brief 02</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract>Indonesia's forests were inventoried from 1989 to 1996 (phase 1) and from 1995 to 2000 (phase 2) by the Forest Planning Agency ('the Agency') at the Ministry of Forestry
as part of a collaboration between the Government of Indonesia and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. The objective of this National Forest Inventory (NFI) was to assess foreststand conditions, stocks, growth rates and tree diversity across the
landscapes of Indonesia. An improved version of the NFI became known as the Forest Assessment and Monitoring System. This data set had not so far been used to estimate
aboveground tree biomass and carbon stock in Indonesia, as quality control of the data had not been completed. We provide an overview of the data and derive carbon-stock
densities for different forest types and locations that can be used for estimating historical, aboveground CO2 emissions from deforestation 2 and forest degradation.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Harja D, Dewi S, Heryawan F and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Forest carbon-stock estimates based on National Forest Inventory data. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<grp>ALREDDI</grp>
	<publicationid>2546</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>18</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0018-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Indonesia's land-use and land-cover changes and their trajectories (1990, 2000 and 2005)</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Atiek Widayati, Sonya Dewi, Saipul Rahman and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ALLREDDI Brief 01</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Indonesia has experienced unprecedented landcover
changes over the past few decades<br/>
Deforestation, forest degradation, peatland
conversion and burning have drawn global
attention owing to the significant amounts of
emission of the greenhouse gases that cause
global warming<br/>
Indonesia has declared its commitment to reduce
emissions by 26?41% by 2020. More than 50% of
the emission reduction target is intended to come
from the land-use, land-use-change and forestry
sector (LULUCF)<br/>
A monitoring, reporting and validating system is
necessary to compare the performance of climatechange
mitigation actions against past emissions<br/>
Credible past emission estimates are required, for
which we need two basic data sets: (1) historical
land-use changes; and (2) emission factors for
each land-use change, before and after the
change]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Widayati A, Dewi S, Rahman S and van Noordwijk M. 2011. Indonesia's land-use and land-cover changes and their trajectories (1990, 2000 and 2005). Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5, ALLREDDI</grp>
	<publicationid>2545</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>47</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0047-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Enrichment planting with Dipterocarpaceae species in rubber agroforests: manual</maintitle>
	<author>Hesti L. Tata, Gede Wibawa and Laxman Joshi</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>23</totalpages>
	<descript3>979-3198-49-1</descript3>
	<abstract><![CDATA[This manual was written to promote enrichment planting with meranti in rubber agroforests (Chapter 1); give an introduction to several species of Dipterocarpaceae, their seed physiology and habitat distribution (Chapter 2); nursery techniques for seedlings and cuttings (Chapter 3); and cultivation techniques, including land preparation, planting distance and seed maintenance (Chapter 4).<br/>
This manual was compiled based on results of research we conducted in Bungo and Tebo districts, Jambi province, Sumatra, Indonesia. It is intended to be used as a field handbook for practitioners, extension workers, farmers and anyone else who wants to plant meranti or other Dipterocarpaceae species in rubber gardens. Using this manual, rubber farmers can develop their own nursery independently or together in farmers' groups, by collecting seeds from forests or other sites.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Tata HL, Wibawa G and Joshi L. 2010. Enrichment planting with Dipterocarpaceae species in rubber agroforests: manual. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 23 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2544</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>395</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0395-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Feedback loops added to four conceptual models linking land change with driving forces and actors</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Betha Lusiana, Grace B.Villamor, Herry Purnomo and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2011</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Ecology and Society</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The Resilience Alliance</publisher>
	<volume>16</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>1-3</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Four main types of feedback are:<br/>
1. Land use, or the direct benefits that agents derive from their impact on land cover; it
usually involves direct learning and relatively short response cycles, although there is
ongoing debate about how much an economic lens misses of real motivations of the agents (Villamor et al. 2011).<br/>
2. Land use planning, or the attempts by stakeholders of land cover beyond the land
user, to change the rules that are part of the set of drivers influencing land users.<br/>
3. Agent-specific modification of incentive structures that are conditional on performance, as attempted in forms of Payments for Ecosystem Services and related institutions (Tomich et al. 2004, Van Noordwijk et al. 2004, Swallow et al. 2009, Van Noordwijk and Leimona 2010).<br/>
4. Generic changes in rules and economic incentives through policy change that is
expected to enhance ecosystem services and/ or economic performance at (sub)national scale, as currently discussed under the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) umbrella where clarity on drivers and agents is needed (Blom et al. 2010).]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B, Villamor GB, Purnomo H and Dewi S. 2011. Feedback loops added to four conceptual models linking land change with driving forces and actors. Ecology and Society. 16(1):P. 1-3.</citation>
	<publicationid>2543</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>307</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0307-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>A framework for prioritising nutrient management research in vegetable production in the southern Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Chris Dorahy, Agustin Mercado, Jr., Cecille Marie Quinones, Regie Bicamon, Juanita Salvani, Carmelito Lapoot, Valeriana Justo, John Oakeshott, Josefina Atienza and Anabella B. Tulin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science. Soil science for a changing world</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Brisbane, Australia</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>5-8</mainpages>
	<abstract>This paper describes an approach which has been used to identify and prioritise nutrient management research activities in a project currently being undertaken in the southern Philippines. It has highlighted the potential to improve the productivity and profitability of these systems by reallocating limited capital (fertiliser) resources from phosphorus and potassium to nitrogen based on an application of soil test information and the principles of nutrient budgeting. This approach also has applications for developing broader agricultural research programs in that it can be used as a tool for identifying and prioritising the activities which are likely to be the most successful and establish likely timeframes for impact.</abstract>
	<keywords>Research planning, decision making, capacity building</keywords>
	<notes>19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1-6 August 2010</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dorahy C, Mercado, Jr. A, Quinones CM, Bicamon R, Salvani J, Lapoot C, Justo V, Oakeshott J, Atienza J and Tulin AB. 2010. A framework for prioritising nutrient management research in vegetable production in the southern Philippines. Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science. Soil science for a changing world. Brisbane, Australia. </citation>
	<publicationid>2542</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>306</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0306-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Soil management and crop nutrition for tomato in acid soil of Claveria, Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Anabella B. Tulin and Christopher Dorahy</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science. Soil science for a changing world</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Brisbane, Australia</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>270-273</mainpages>
	<abstract>Integrated soil management and crop nutrition need to be developed for vegetable based production system in the upland areas in Claveria, Philippines, being a ?tomato bowl? of the country. A study was conducted to find alternative fertility management options for tomato production. As a result of participatory assessment and soil survey and analysis, 3 alternative treatments were being compared against farmer?s fertility level, which was normally 3-5 times more than what the crop needs. The results indicated that growth of tomato was more influenced by the level of N when P and K were not limiting. This was partly influenced by the mobility of N during intense rainfall. The better yield in farmer?s fertility level was attributed to the addition of organic matter which reduced N loss during intense rainfall. Under intense rainfall, diseases severity was not influenced by the different fertility levels. Although farmer had intensive pesticides application, occurrence of diseases still persisted. Marketable and non-marketable yields were still superior under farmer?s fertility level than the alternative treatments. Farmer?s fertility level still provided better income against alternative treatments. Tomato fertility levels and management regimes should revolve around climatic conditions that would enhance better nutrient use efficiency.</abstract>
	<keywords>Integrated, N efficiency, farmer’s fertility management</keywords>
	<notes>19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 1-6 August 2010</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR, Tulin AB and Dorahy C. 2010. Soil management and crop nutrition for tomato in acid soil of Claveria, Philippines. Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science. Soil science for a changing world. Brisbane, Australia. </citation>
	<publicationid>2541</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>305</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0305-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Evidence-based nutrient management strategy in identifying fertility status and
soil constraints for vegetable production in the Southern Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Anabella B. Tulin, Cecille Marie Quinones, Roland Rallos, Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Juanita Salvani, Carmelito Lapoot, Valeriana Justo and Chris Dorahy</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings of the World Congress of Soil Science. Soil science for a changing world</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Brisbane, Australia</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>168-171</mainpages>
	<abstract>Participatory and soil assessment surveys were conducted in five major vegetable producing areas in Southern Philippines to define the current nutrient status and management practices involving vegetable production. Five sites were identified in each area representing four regions in Southern Philippines that were identified as vegetable producing farms and represent the major sources of vegetables sold in the
Visayas and Mindanao islands. Soil samples were gathered in each site representing the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth and were analyzed in the laboratory for its physico-chemical characteristics. In the participatory assessment surveys, more than 100 farmers were interviewed for the current management practices they employed in vegetable production and the major problems they encountered in producing vegetables. The key outcomes of these investigations are: 1) growers identified lack of capital and high fertilizer prices as a key constraint to vegetable production; 2) the results of soil fertility evaluation suggests that growers are undersupplying some nutrients and oversupplying others leading to nutrients imbalances in the soil and, 3)
lack of capital is not an issue but an issue of more effective allocation of limited capital (fertilizer) resources.</abstract>
	<keywords>Participatory assessment, soil survey, vegetable production, constraints, Southern Philippines.</keywords>
	<notes>19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Tulin AB, Quinones CM, Rallos R, Mercado Jr. AR, Salvani J, Lapoot C, Justo V and Dorahy C. 2010. Evidence-based nutrient management strategy in identifying fertility status and
soil constraints for vegetable production in the Southern Philippines. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. Brisbane, Australia. </citation>
	<publicationid>2540</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>304</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0304-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Farmers? Experiences on Low-Pressure Drip Irrigation for Vegetable Production in Southeast Asia and the Pacific</maintitle>
	<author>Manuel Palada, Mercado A.R., Roberts, M., V. B. Ella, Manuel Reyes, A. B. Susila, D. T. Ha, D. L. Wu and M. Bhattarai</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Acta Horticulturae</secondtitle>
	<publisher>International Society for Horticultural Science.</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Belgium</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Palada M, Mercado A, Roberts M, Ella VB, Reyes M, Susila AB, Ha DT, Wu DL and Bhattarai M. 2010. Farmers’ Experiences on Low-Pressure Drip Irrigation for Vegetable Production in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Acta Horticulturae. Belgium. International Society for Horticultural Science.. </citation>
	<publicationid>2539</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>287</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0287-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rubber + Upland Rice in a Rubber Agroforestry System (RAS): Economic, Food Security and Environmental Stimulus Among Smallholder Farmers</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr. and Don Immanuel Edralin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR and Edralin DI. Rubber + Upland Rice in a Rubber Agroforestry System (RAS): Economic, Food Security and Environmental Stimulus Among Smallholder Farmers. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2538</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>286</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0286-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Vermicomposting: Enhancing soil fertility management and carbon sequestration at smallholder?s farms</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Javier E, Caroline Duque-Piñon and Manuel Reyes</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR, Javier E, Duque-Piñon C and Reyes M. Vermicomposting: Enhancing soil fertility management and carbon sequestration at smallholder’s farms. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2537</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>285</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0285-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rainwater Harvesting; An Answer to Uneven Distribution of Rainfall Due to Climate Change</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr. and Don Immanuel Edralin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR and Edralin DI. Rainwater Harvesting; An Answer to Uneven Distribution of Rainfall Due to Climate Change. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2536</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>284</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0284-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Understanding vegetable-tree interaction is a key to successful vegetable farming enterprise</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Caroline Duque-Piñon and Manuel Reyes</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR, Duque-Piñon C and Reyes M. Understanding vegetable-tree interaction is a key to successful vegetable farming enterprise. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2535</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>283</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0283-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Smallholder Rubber Agroforestry System in Mindanao, Philippines: A village approach to Climate Change Mitagation</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr. and Don Immanuel Edralin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR and Edralin DI. Smallholder Rubber Agroforestry System in Mindanao, Philippines: A village approach to Climate Change Mitagation. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2534</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>282</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0282-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Evergreen Agriculture on Slopes for Climate Change through integrated agroforestry production system that enable farms to achieve multifunctional ecosystem which integrates</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Don Immanuel Edralin and Caroline Duque-Piñon</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Philippines</publicationplace>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR, Edralin DI and Duque-Piñon C. Evergreen Agriculture on Slopes for Climate Change through integrated agroforestry production system that enable farms to achieve multifunctional ecosystem which integrates. : Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2533</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>394</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0394-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Factors affecting soil loss at plot scale and sediment yield at catchment scale in a tropical volcanic agroforestry landscape</maintitle>
	<author>Bruno Verbist, Jean Poesen, Meine van Noordwijk, Widianto, Didik Suprayogo, Fahmuddin Agus and Jozef Deckers</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Catena</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier B.V.</publisher>
	<volume>80</volume>
	<edition>1</edition>
	<mainpages>34-46</mainpages>
	<abstract>Tropical deforestation and land use change is often perceived as the major cause of soil loss by water erosion and of sediment load in rivers that has a negative impact on the functioning of hydropower storage reservoirs. The Sumberjaya area in Sumatra, Indonesia is representative for conflicts and evictions arising from this perception. The purpose of this study as part of a Negotiation Support System approach was to assess sediment yield both at plot and catchment scale and to relate it to a variety of possible clarifying factors i.e. land use, geology, soil and topography. Sediment yield at catchment scale per unit area, was found to be 3?10 times higher than soil loss measured in erosion plots. A stepwise regression showed that the dominant factors explaining sediment yield differences at catchment scale in this volcanic landscape were a particular lithology (Old Andesites) and slope angle followed by the silt fraction of the top soil. In lithologically sensitive areas soil loss at the plot scale under monoculture coffee gardens decreases over time from on average 7?11 Mg ha- 1 yr- 1 to 4?6 Mg ha- 1 yr- 1, mainly because of the development of surface litter layers as filters and top soil compaction in the areas without litter, but remains higher than under shade coffee systems or forest. The runoff coefficient under monoculture coffee remains on average significantly higher (10?15%) than under forest (4%) or under shade coffee systems (4?7%). In lithologically stable areas soil loss remained below 1.8 Mg ha- 1 yr- 1 and the runoff coefficient below 2.5% under all land use types, even bare soil plots or monoculture coffee gardens. Less than 20% of the catchment area produces almost 60% of the sediment yield. The reduction of negative off-site effects on e.g. the life time of a storage reservoir would benefit greatly from an improved assessment of the lithologies in volcanic landscapes and the consideration of potential sediment source and sink areas. In lithologically sensitive areas, a shift from sun to shade coffee systems may result in reducing surface runoff and soil loss, although water erosion at the plot scale is not the main contributor to sediment yield at the catchment scale. The quantification of land use effects on dominant erosive processes such as river bank and river bed erosion, landslides and the concentrated flow erosion on footpaths and roads can contribute to more targeted efforts and relevant incentives to reduce (or live with) sediment load of the rivers.</abstract>
	<keywords>Coffee; Erosion; Land use; Negotiation support system; Scale</keywords>
	<notes>10.1016/j.catena.2009.08.007</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Verbist B, Poesen J, van Noordwijk M, Widianto , Suprayogo D, Agus F and Deckers J. 2010. Factors affecting soil loss at plot scale and sediment yield at catchment scale in a tropical volcanic agroforestry landscape. Catena. 80(1):P. 34-46.</citation>
	<publicationid>2532</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>303</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0303-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Forests and Climate Change in the Asia Pacific Region</maintitle>
	<author>Ben Vickers, Promode Kant, Rodel D. Lasco, Allison Bleaney, Sarah Milne, Regan Suzuki, Lawrence Ramos and Erica Pohnan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 7</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Food and Agriculture Organization</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Rome, Italy</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>108</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[There is now global consensus that climate change is a real and significant threat strongly related to anthropogenic causes. The implications are arguably even more relevant for the Asia-Pacific than other regions given its high population levels, large numbers of poor and otherwise vulnerable people and the richness of biodiversity and ecology among its highly diverse countries. It is also a region with some of the greatest potential ? both in terms of carbon sequestration capacity and the human resources ? to contribute to both mitigation and adaptation efforts. One of the key areas of focus on the current international climate change stage is the role of forests. The significance of
this single factor in mitigating, or potentially hastening the process of climate change, is coming to be fully realized. In light of this, and the particularly close linkage between communities in the Asia-Pacific region and the forests upon which many depend, it is imperative that forests play a central role in efforts to manage or adapt to climate change.<br/>
The development of climate change-related policies, as well as the status and approaches to forest management in the context of climate change, vary widely throughout the region. While Asia and the Pacific have seen an increase of forest cover, when disaggregated, it is clear that this is largely due to an ?outlier? effect ? the ambitious reforestation policies of a small number of countries, namely China, India and Viet Nam. The rest of the region and Southeast Asia in particular, continue to experience high rates of deforestation.<br/>
This has implications for potential mitigation and adaptation strategies, and particularly for regional and international efforts to develop mechanisms, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD)1 to stem the drivers of deforestation and degradation. A number of non-Annex I countries in the region, such as the Philippines and Indonesia, are being highly proactive despite having no obligation. They are undertaking emission reduction initiatives, reforestation and afforestation efforts and seeking stronger regional cooperation in tackling trans-boundary fire and pest management issues. Other countries have taken less initiative, in some cases due to limited forest area already under protected status, or preoccupation with more imminent post-conflict concerns as in the case of Afghanistan or Timor-Leste.<br/>
Capacity limitations critically restrict the degree to which countries can engage with climate change issues. There is a need to harmonize regional capacity levels and strengthen coordination and sharing of knowledge as well as mitigation and adaptation technologies. This will require financing. While this analysis indicates that there are such financing mechanisms, countries tend to perceive them as insufficient or unreliable. These factors influence the degrees to which countries integrate forestry and climate change policies within broader development frameworks.<br/>
Although forests have been recognized worldwide as a key part of the global response to climate change, many Asia-Pacific countries still have not integrated climate change strategies within national forest policies, laws and institutions. Forestry-related climate change initiatives are emerging nonetheless, and there is widespread evidence that countries are defining their own, unique country-specific strategies to harness the potential of forests for climate change mitigation and adaptation.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Vickers B, Kant P, Lasco RD, Bleaney A, Milne S, Suzuki R, Ramos L and Pohnan E. 2010. Forests and Climate Change in the Asia Pacific Region. Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 7. Rome, Italy. Food and Agriculture Organization. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2531</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>311</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0311-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Chapter 11: Climate Change Adaptation and Community Forest Management</maintitle>
	<author>Juan M. Pulhin, Rodel D. Lasco, Florencia B Pulhin, Lawrence Ramos and Rose Jane J. Peras</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Issues and Challenges.</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bedfordshire, UK</publicationplace>
	<volume>4</volume>
	<totalpages>21</totalpages>
	<mainpages>243-263</mainpages>
	<notes>10.1108/S2040-7262(2010)0000004017</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Pulhin JM, Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Ramos L and Peras RJ. 2010. Chapter 11: Climate Change Adaptation and Community Forest Management. Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Issues and Challenges. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management. United Kingdom. : Emerald Group Publishing Limited. P. 243-263.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2530</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>141</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0141-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Estimasi Karbon Tersimpan di Lahan-lahan Pertanian di DAS Konto, Jawa Timur. RACSA (Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal)</maintitle>
	<author>Syahrul Kurniawan, Cahyo Prayogo, Widianto, M. Thoha Zulkarnain, Nina Dwi Lestari, Fitri Khusyu Aini and Kurniatun Hairiah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no 120</edition>
	<totalpages>60</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The carbon (C) sequestration of vegetation can be rapidly estimated by measuring the C stored in aboveground biomass (trees and understorey), necromass (dead standing trees, stump, fallen branch, leaf, twig, flowers and fruits), and soil organic matter and roots. The total C stored in all components of aboveground and belowground biomass and necromass, technically called as C stock. The total C stock varies among land cover depending on land management i.e. plant species composition, age and population density. Consequently, changing in land use management will affect total C stock at the whole landscape.<br/>
Analysis was done using local land use maps of 1990 and 2000 of Kali Konto watershed
(Malang regency, East Java), the result showed that forest area reduced and followed by increasing total area of ?belukar? (bush fallow) and plantation. The common land cover found were agroforestry coffee based system, plantation (Hutan Tanaman Industri) such as pine (<i>Pinus mercusii</i>), mahogany (<i>Swietenia mahogany</i>) and 'damar' (<i>Agatis</i>sp.) which potentially able to store a big amount of C for longer time. Unfortunately the availability of land cover (agricultural) maps and its potential as C sequestered in Kalikonto is very limited. Various versions of land use maps are available locally with various land use classification lead to confusing rather than clarification creating difficulties on detecting land cover change. More accurate estimation of areas per land cover in Kali Konto watershed is needed for calculating C stored at watershed level. This research was done to answer four research question such as:<br/>
1. How much carbon stored (C stock) in aboveground biomass of each land cover in Kali
Konto watershed?<br/>
2. How much the C stocks that are actually present on each cover, averaged over the
lifecycle of each land cover (time-averaged of carbon stock)?<br/>
3. How big forest areas in 1990 were converted into agricultural land?<br/>
4. How much C stock lost after forest converted into agricultural land?]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Aboveground, carbon, C stock, C sequestration, C stored</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Kurniawan S, Prayogo C, Widianto , Zulkarnain MT, Lestari ND, Aini FK and Hairiah K. 2010. Estimasi Karbon Tersimpan di Lahan-lahan Pertanian di DAS Konto, Jawa Timur. RACSA (Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal). Working Paper no 120Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 60 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2529</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>140</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0140-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Studi Biodiversitas: Apakah Agroforestri Mampu Mengkonservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati di DAS KONTO? RABA (Rapid Agro-Biodiversity Appraisal)</maintitle>
	<author>Fitri Khusyu Aini, Syahrul Kurniawan, Gede Wibawa and Kurniatun Hairiah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no 119</edition>
	<totalpages>158</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Luasan hutan alami di DAS Konto (Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur) terus menurun, sementara jumlah penduduk meningkat dari 587 jiwa / km2 pada tahun 1990 menjadi 657 jiwa / km2 di tahun 2005. Berdasarkan analisis peta perubahan tutupan lahan yang ada di DAS Konto telah terjadi penurunan luasan hutan rata-rata 0.8% per tahunnya (atau 196.7 ha/tahun), sementara luasan semak belukar dan perkebunan (kayu) terus meningkat.Tutupan lahan yang umum dijumpai adalah perkebunan pinus (<i>Pinus
mercusii</i>),mahoni (<i>Swietenia mahogany</i>) dan 'damar' (<i>Agatis</i> sp.) yang berpotensi cukup besar sebagai penyimpan karbon dalam jangka lama. Bila dibandingkan dengan kondisi di hutan alami, biodiversitas dan fungsinya pada lahan-lahan pertanian menurun karena kondisi ekosistem secara luas telah berubah.Namun
demikian, ketersedian data untuk mendukung negosiasi konservasi biodiversitas masih sangat terbatas.<br/>
Studi tentang biodiversiats ini dilakukan pada bulan Januari - Juli, 2009, di DAS Konto hulu yang mencakup berbagai macam system penggunaan lahan di Kecamatan Ngantang dan Pujon (Kabupaten Malang, Jawa Timur). Kegiatan ini diawali dengan mengumpulkan data sekunder penelitian terdahulu berkenaan dengan perubahan tutupan lahan di DAS Konto, diversitas pohon dan cacing tanah pada berbagai system penggunaan lahan. Sedangkan untuk penggalian informasi dari stakeholder tentang nilai penting tumbuhan, hewan dan sistem agroforestri maka informasi diperoleh melalui PRA, <i>indepth interview, ground check</i> lapangan. Selain itu, informasi tentang diversitas hewan dalam tanah seperti nematoda dan rayap diperoleh melalui pengukuran langsung di lapangan.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Aini FK, Kurniawan S, Wibawa G and Hairiah K. 2010. Studi Biodiversitas: Apakah Agroforestri Mampu Mengkonservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati di DAS KONTO? RABA (Rapid Agro-Biodiversity Appraisal). Working paper no 119Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 158 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2528</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>139</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0139-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Non-timber forest products as a source of livelihood diversification for local communities in the Batang Toru Orangutan Conservation Program</maintitle>
	<author>Jusupta Tarigan, James M Roshetko, Endri Martini and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no 118</edition>
	<totalpages>15</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Batang Toru, located in the northern part of Sumatran island, is one of the few remaining
areas to support populations of the Sumatran orangutan (<i>Pongo abelii</i>). The existence of an orangutan population of 400 in the area was documented through a population and habitat viability assessment (Singleton 2004). Recent studies estimate that the population may be 380 at the current time. Although the Batang Toru orangutan population is smaller, its threat from habitat loss is relatively low (below 2% annually). This low rate of habitat loss is the result of topographic features that limit access and traditional indigenous forest management systems that are sustainable and value healthy environments. Besides orangutan, the Batang Toru forest is also rich in other endemic plant and animal species (for example, Dipterocarpaceae species (<i>Shorea</i> spp., <i>Anisoptera</i> spp., <i>Dipterocarpus</i> spp.) and the Sumatran tiger). Up to the present, the gradient of land-use systems practised by local communities in Batang Toru has been compatible with conservation of the area?s unique and globally important biodiversity. However, in the future, the expanding human population of Batang Toru may threaten the forest and all of its components if suitable livelihoods are not identified and developed. In that context, we see a number of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) that are produced in Batang Toru forest systems (for example, mixed tree gardens, agroforests and forests) as having the potential to diversify and secure viable livelihood options for the people of Batang Toru.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Sumatran orangutan, Batang Toru, NTFPs, livelihoods, agroforest, land use</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Tarigan J, Roshetko JM, Martini E and Ekadinata A. 2010. Non-timber forest products as a source of livelihood diversification for local communities in the Batang Toru Orangutan Conservation Program. Working paper no 118Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 15 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2527</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>138</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0138-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Landscape Dynamics Over Time and Space From Ecological Perspective</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no 103</edition>
	<totalpages>75</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Land-use and land-cover changes driven by multiple factors have a tremendous impact on services provided by the environmental as well as the livelihoods and economic development of people living in, and far from, particular landscapes. For biodiversity in particular, landscape configuration is as important as landscape composition especially where there is increasing fragmentation and reduced connectivity of habitat.<br/>
Protected areas alone are necessary but not sufficient in maintaining biodiversity at the
landscape level for several reasons: (i) management and enforcement are often weak;
(ii) protected areas are often in remote, rough terrain that does not represent various ecoregions with various species assemblages and endemism; (iii) the extent of protected areas is sometimes not large enough to allow minimum viable populations so that in the long run species extinction might happen nevertheless; (iv) protected areas without buffer zones and corridors can easily be isolated rather than integral parts of a landscape.<br/>
Multifunctional landscapes that accommodate conservation and development need to be considered as integrated, rather than segregated, systems; this will allow us to achieve the objective of maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. Land-use plans that aim to increase multifunctionality of landscapes should be informed by the current status of landscape composition and configuration, the process of land-use and land-cover changes in the past and planned for the future, areas that are vulnerable to changes in the future and options for intervention. The land-use planning process should be conducted within a negotiation process among multiple stakeholders.<br/>
Our research provides some results to be used as a basis for negotiation, which are produced from a combination of tools for remote sensing, GIS and spatial analysis guided by ecological principles. The results provide data for further research as well as suggest follow-up research questions.<br/>
These analyses of five landscapes (Bungo in Indonesia, Viengkham in Laos, Manompana in Madagascar, Takamanda-Mone in Cameroon and East Usambara in Tanzania) use the same methodology and tools, allowing comparisons across sites. Deforestation rates and land-use and land-cover changes across landscapes are used to define the stage of forest transition: Takamanda-Mone, Viengkham, Manompana, East Usambara and Bungo is the ordered list from earliest to advanced stages. Spatial patterns of deforestation, depending on landscape topography, level of accessibility and the state of forest transition, either are concentrated in relatively flat areas in the landscape, follow encroachment patterns on the primary forest block, run along the transportation network or expand from existing settlements. Combining these spatial patterns of deforestation with changes in landscape configuration, especially at sub-landscape level (quantified by selected indices), we can identify vulnerable areas in the future so that options to reduce risks can be discussed and negotiated within land-use planning processes.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Landscape composition, configuration, matrix, connectivity, fragmentation, drivers of landuse changes, multifunctional landscapes</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Dewi S and Ekadinata A. 2010. Landscape Dynamics Over Time and Space From Ecological Perspective. Working paper no 103Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 75 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2526</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>310</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0310-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Indonesia: A pilot PES auction in the Sumberjaya watershed</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona and Broke Kelsey Jack</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Paying for Biodiversity: Enhancing the Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services</secondtitle>
	<publisher>OECD</publisher>
	<publicationplace>France</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>18</totalpages>
	<mainpages>161-178</mainpages>
	<abstract>This chapter discusses a pilot inverse auction PES programme applied in the Sumberjaya Watershed in Indonesia to reduce sedimentation from coffee plantations. The process of design and implementation is discussed, highlighting issues that arise in a developing country context. The chapter also discusses how the pilot auction can be used as a price revelation mechanism, enabling payments to better reflect the costs of ecosystem services provision for any future scaled-up PES programme.</abstract>
	<notes>DOI : 10.1787/9789264090279-13-en</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B and Kelsey Jack B. 2010. Indonesia: A pilot PES auction in the Sumberjaya watershed. Paying for Biodiversity: Enhancing the Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services. France. : OECD. P. 161-178.</citation>
	<publicationid>2525</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>393</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0393-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The Conditions for Functional Mechanisms of Compensation and Reward for Environmental Services</maintitle>
	<author>Brent M. Swallow, Beria Leimona, Thomas Yatich and Sandra J.Velarde</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Ecology and Society</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The Resilience Alliance</publisher>
	<volume>15</volume>
	<edition>4</edition>
	<mainpages>6</mainpages>
	<abstract>Mechanisms of compensation and reward for environmental services (CRES) are becoming increasingly contemplated as means for managing human?environment interactions. Most of the functional mechanisms in the tropics have been developed within the last 15 years; many developing countries still have had little experience with functional mechanisms. We consider the conditions that foster the origin and implementation of functional mechanisms. Deductive and inductive approaches are combined. Eight hypotheses are derived from theories of institution and policy change. Five case studies, from Latin America, Africa, and Asia, are then reviewed according to a common framework. The results suggest the following to be important conditions for functional CRES mechanisms: (1) localized scarcity for particular environmental services, (2) influence from international environmental agreements and international
organizations, (3) government policies and public attitudes favoring a mixture of regulatory and marketbased instruments, and (4) security of individual and group property rights.</abstract>
	<keywords>carbon sequestration; ecosystem services; ecotourism; environmental services; institutional change; payments for environmental services; watershed services</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Swallow BM, Leimona B, Yatich T and Velarde SJ. 2010. The Conditions for Functional Mechanisms of Compensation and Reward for Environmental Services. Ecology and Society. 15(4):P. 6.</citation>
	<publicationid>2524</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>302</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0302-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Agroforestri kopi untuk mempertahankan cadangan karbon lanskap</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Simposium Kopi 2010</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Denpasar, Bali</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>31</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Tujuan makalah ini untuk mengestimasi: (1) kontribusi agroforestri kopi dalam
mempertahankan cadangan karbon di tingkat lanskap, (2) besarnya <i>time-averaged C stock</i> agroforestri kopi di Indonesia. Estimasi perubahan cadangan karbon di sub-DAS Kali Konto (Malang, Jatim) dilakukan dengan mengukur cadangan karbon di hutan
alami, agroforestri kopi, perkebunan dan tanaman semusim menggunakan metode
RaCSA (Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal), pada Juni-Desember 2008. <i>Time-averaged C
stock</i> agroforestri kopi multistrata, agroforestri sederhana kopi dan kopi monokultur diestimasi dari pengukuran di Malang, Jember, Lombok Barat, Lampung Barat.<\br>
Alih guna hutan menjadi lahan pertanian di sub-DAS Kali Konto (23810.13 ha)
selama 15 tahun, menyebabkan kehilangan karbon 25924 Mg th-1 atau setara 1.48 Mg
ha-1. Kehilangan karbon tersebut dari hutan alami 1.09 Mg ha-1 th-1, perkebunan 0.25 Mg ha-1 th-1, dan agroforestri berbasis kopi 0.05 Mg ha-1 th-1. Meningkatnya luasan tanaman semusim terjadi perolehan (sequestrasi) karbon hanya 0.03 Mg ha-1 th-1 (3% dari total karbon yang hilang dari hutan), sehingga jumlah perolehan tersebut belum dapat menggantikan kehilangan karbon dari alih guna hutan.<\br>
Pengelolaan lahan yang benar sangat menentukan besarnya cadangan karbon.
Untuk Indonesia, laju pertumbuhan cadangan karbon pada agroforestri multistrata kopi
0.9?1.86 Mg ha-1 th-1 dan agroforestri sederhana (umumnya milik masyarakat) 0.6?0.97 Mg ha-1 th-1 dan 2.8 Mg ha-1 th-1 di kebun percobaan. Sedang pada kopi monokultur hanya 0.5 Mg ha-1 th-1. Dengan demikian <i>time-averaged C stock</i> agroforestri kopi di Indonesia (umur kopi 15 tahun) sekitar 41 Mg ha-1, dan lahan kopi monokultur (12.5 Mg ha-1) sekitar 30 Mg ha-1 lebih rendah.]]></abstract>
	<keywords><![CDATA[Agroforestri kopi, cadangan karbon, hutan alami, <i>time-averaged carbon stock</i>]]></keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Hairiah K and Rahayu S. 2010. Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Agroforestri kopi untuk mempertahankan cadangan karbon lanskap. Simposium Kopi 2010. Denpasar, Bali. Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6, TULSEA</grp>
	<publicationid>2523</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>301</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0301-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon stock assessment for a forest-to-coffee conversion landscape in Kalikonto watershed (East Java, Indonesia): Scaling up from plot to landscape level</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah, Syahrul Kurniawan, Fitri Khusyu Aini, Nina Dwi Lestari, Iva Dewi Lestariningsih, Widianto, Thoha Zulkarnaen and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Conference on Coffee Science (ASIC)</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Denpasar, Bali</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>8</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The impacts on net sequestration of CO2 or net release to the atmosphere of CO2, of a change in land use from natural forest to tree-based agricultural system can be rapidly estimated by measuring the carbon (C) stocks of both land use systems in a Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RACSA). Aim of this study was to assess the aboveground C stocks at landscape level for the Kalikonto sub-watershed (Malang regency, East Java), using land use maps of 1990 and 2005. During that period remaining natural forest was reduced by 2.6% per year and by 33% on aggregate, while the total area of annual crop and of settlements increased by 2.5%/year (aggregate 45%) and 1.1%/year (aggregate 18%), respectively. The area of tree plantations and agroforestry were reduced about 0.6%/year (aggregate 10%). Plot-level measurements of aboveground C stock in June ?December 2008 covered the eight land use systems (LUS) most commonly found in the study area: 1) remnant natural forest, 2) bamboo forest, 3-5) 3 types of plantation i.e. pine (<i>Pinus merkusii</i>), mahogany (<i>Swietenia mahogany</i>) and dammar (<i>Agathis dammara</i>); 6) multistrata shaded coffee with fruit and timber trees, as well as nitrogen-fixing shade trees; 7) simple shade coffee (using <i>Gliricidia sepium</i> as shade tree); and, 8) annual cropping systems (vegetable and food crops). The natural forest in Kalikonto area has been severely disturbed as shown by a low aboveground C stock of about 136 Mg ha-1. Aboveground C stock in coffee-based agroforestry systems was lower, at about 44 Mg C ha-1. The time averaged C stock of tree plantations (pinus, mahogany, and damar mostly aged 25-40 years) was estimated to be 85 Mg C ha-1. The estimated time averaged-C stock (above-ground) in annual crops was only 2 Mg ha-1. Extrapolation of C stock at plot level to watershed level were done by multiplying the area of each land cover with its time-averaged aboveground C stock. Within 15 years, C lost for the whole watershed (23810 ha) was estimated to be 27750 Mg yr-1 or equivalent to a yearly C loss of 1.17 Mg ha-1. Carbon lost from natural forest was about 0.92 Mg ha-1 yr-1, tree plantations lost 0.15 Mg ha-1 yr-1. Carbon lost from coffee-based agroforestry systems was relatively small, about 0.03 Mg ha-1 yr-1. Planting more diverse shade trees in coffee-based agroforestry system may increase the role of coffee gardens in net C sequestration at the landscape scale.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hairiah K, Kurniawan S, Aini FK, Lestari ND, Lestariningsih ID, Widianto , Zulkarnaen T and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Carbon stock assessment for a forest-to-coffee conversion landscape in Kalikonto watershed (East Java, Indonesia): Scaling up from plot to landscape level. International Conference on Coffee Science (ASIC). Denpasar, Bali. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2522</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>300</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0300-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon Stock and Tree Diversity in Tripa Peat Swamp Forest</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu, Rahayu Oktaviani, Hesti L. Tata and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>The 2nd International Symposium of Indonesian Wood Research Society</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Indonesian Wood Research Society (IWoRS)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bali, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>545-551</mainpages>
	<abstract>Peat swamp forest currently gets great attention owing to its high storage capacity of belowground carbon. Tripa peat swamp forest is a part of Kawasan Ekosistem Leuser (KEL) in Aceh province has a high conservation value as a habitat of the endangered species of Sumatran orang-utan (Pongo abelii). Aboveground carbon stock was measured in an agro forest area and three forest types, viz. undisturbed, disturbed and secondary forest using standard protocol. Average density of aboveground carbon stock in the 4 different land use types ranged from 28.5 t/ha to 193 t/ha, in agroforest area and undisturbed peat forest respectively. Besides its capacity to store carbon, Tripa peat swamp forest had a high diversity of tree species with Shannon Wiener index of 3.61. Many species of food source for orang-utan occurs in the forest with high Important Value Index, such as Eugenia jambos, Eugenia curtisii, Litsea cubeba and Laurus nobilis. Forest clearing and conversion to oil palm plantation were two threats of the lost of Sumatran orang-utan habitat in Tripa.</abstract>
	<keywords>high conservation value forest (HCVF), habitat, Sumatran orang-utan</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Rahayu S, Oktaviani R, Tata HL and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Carbon Stock and Tree Diversity in Tripa Peat Swamp Forest. The 2nd International Symposium of Indonesian Wood Research Society. Bali, Indonesia. Indonesian Wood Research Society (IWoRS). </citation>
	<publicationid>2521</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>137</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0137-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rubber agroforests and governance at the interface between conservation and livelihoods in Bungo district, Jambi province, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Endri Martini, Ratna Akiefnawati, Laxman Joshi, Sonya Dewi, Andree Ekadinata, Laurène Feintrenie and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no 124</edition>
	<totalpages>53</totalpages>
	<abstract>Multiple forces are at work in most landscapes. The area in Jambi province, Indonesia, that was selected as one of the benchmark sites for the global study of biodiversity in mixed landscapes is no exception. The history of land use and the key local and external stakeholders associated with change form the backdrop for the dynamics studied. Major changes in the Bungo district of Jambi province started with Dutch colonial expansion in 1906 and the associated introduction of Hevea brasiliensis ('para' rubber) linked to trade networks at the mouth of the Batanghari River, the major transport route. The 1970s started another period of rapid change with roads, commercial logging and transmigration projects, followed by oil palm expansion. The current stakeholders, at landscape and local levels, reflect this history in their perceptions and ambitions. Formal governance processes in Indonesia as a whole have started to have a direct influence on local dynamics, including management of natural resources, rule enforcement and conflict resolution. The current links between various levels of governance (from local to national) influence the ways conflicts can be resolved and solutions negotiated. The interface between conservation and livelihoods in Bungo is still dominated by rubber agroforests that date back almost a century, but these may become an anachronism, a remnant of the past in a world where the conservation versus livelihood trade-off lost its intermediate ('land sharing') solutions to multi-functionality.</abstract>
	<keywords>rubber agroforest, conservation, livelihood, governance, Bungo</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Martini E, Akiefnawati R, Joshi L, Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Feintrenie L and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Rubber agroforests and governance at the interface between conservation and livelihoods in Bungo district, Jambi province, Indonesia. Working paper no 124Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 53 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2520</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>17</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0017-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra, Meine van Noordwijk, S. Suyanto and Ujjwal P. Pradhan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB Policybrief 21</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Central Kalimantan has been selected as the primary REDD+ pilot in Indonesia. In its peatlands expectations of payments for carbon emission reduction currently shape the discourse over natural resource management as a means of influencing policy and exercising power. Different types of actors use their own interpretation of history, facts, rules and norms to support their claims. Shifting national policies have over the past decades shaped the distribution of power and actual use of peatland. Actions to reduce
emissions will need to appreciate the institutional complexity.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Galudra G, van Noordwijk M, Suyanto S and Pradhan UP. 2010. Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2519</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>270</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0270-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Human livelihoods, ecosystem services and the habitat of the Sumatran orangutan: Rapid assessment in Batang Toru and Tripa</maintitle>
	<author>Made Hesti Lestari Tata, Meine van Noordwijk, Elok Mulyoutami, Subekti Rahayu, Atiek Widayati and Rachmat Mulia</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>136</totalpages>
	<abstract>The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), in collaboration with PanEco and Yayasan Ekosistem Lestari (YEL), conducted a rapid assessment of ecosystem services and human livelihood options provided by the remaining habitat of the Sumatran orangutan outside the Gunung Leuser National Park. We used a rapid analysis of carbon stock assessment (RaCSA) method to assess the carbon stock (aboveand belowground) at plot level and calculated land cover for carbon stock at landscape level. We calculated the net present value of important crop and tree commodities in Tripa and Batang Toru and analysed the costs and benefits of each commodity. To find solutions for better management at the two study sites, applications of the FALLOW model were developed, which allowed comparison of several possible scenarios. An attempt was made to translate such scenarios into opportunities for human livelihoods, orangutan population size and carbon emissions and stocks.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Tata MH, van Noordwijk M, Mulyoutami E, Rahayu S, Widayati A and Mulia R. Human livelihoods, ecosystem services and the habitat of the Sumatran orangutan: Rapid assessment in Batang Toru and Tripa. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 136 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2518</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>269</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0269-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon Emissions from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) in Berau District East Kalimantan, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Arif Rahmanulloh, Fadjar Pambudhi, Ibe Ibrahim, Meine van Noordwijk, Muhammad Sofiyuddin, Mustofa Agung Sardjono, Subekti Rahayu, Sonya Dewi, Suseno Budidarsono and Zuraidah Said</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>48</totalpages>
	<abstract>The overall emission and proportion of emission that is associated with negative, low and high opportunity cost is presented in Figure 2. Conversions to oil palm is shown to be in the high end both in the opportunity cost curve of emissions, due to its NPV which by far is highest compared to any other land use systems. The proportion of emission from conversion to oil palm increases over time. Logging is the single activity that causes the highest proportion of emissions with lower benefit than oil palm conversion per unit C emitted, especially if the conversion is from logged over forest. From ICRAF study on carbon footprint from oil palm plantation development, when the land cover of Cstock lower than 40 t/ha, e.g., grassland, shrubs, is converted to oil palm, there is no C-debt in the long run (assuming 25 years rotation). It is interesting to note here is the large portion of emission that is associated with establishment of forest plantation, which seems to be increasing in the more recent period. The forest plantation to supply raw materials to pulp and paper industry has been established in logged-over forest and undisturbed forests.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Rahmanulloh A, Pambudhi F, Ibrahim I, van Noordwijk M, Sofiyuddin M, Sardjono MA, Rahayu S, Dewi S, Budidarsono S and Said Z. Carbon Emissions from Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) in Berau District East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 48 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2517</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>268</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0268-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Investment in carbon stocks in the eastern buffer zone of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve, Central Kalimantan province, Indonesia: a REDD+ feasibility study</maintitle>
	<author>Laxman Joshi, Janudianto, Meine van Noordwijk and Ujjwal P. Pradhan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Project Report</edition>
	<totalpages>91</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Global interest in reducing the net emissions of greenhouse gases from deforestation, landuse and land-cover change in developing countries has lead to the emergence of a REDD+ (reducing emission from deforestation and degradation plus) framework for maintaining and restoring terrestrial carbon stocks in ?forests?. While the international rules and (financial) incentives at a national scale are still being negotiated, a large number of sub-national and site-specific ?REDD+ demonstration projects? have been identified and designed and many more are in the making under the REDD+ umbrella. REDD+ demonstration projects are not only about reducing carbon emission, but should also effectively and efficiently address the land use?livelihood nexus while exploring alternative development pathways, with implications for both carbon emission and local livelihoods. A key risk in designing REDD+ demonstration projects with a narrow focus on climate change is that this may continue to reward poor governance and do little to alleviate poverty.<br/>
The Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve (LRWR or ?the reserve?) forest conservation and community development project is one of a portfolio of four REDD+ projects being supported by the Clinton Climate Initiative?Forestry program, ?Addressing the challenges of scaling pp REDD+ activities in Indonesia?. The program is demonstrating how REDD+ projects can contribute to 1) helping forest dependent communities move out of poverty, 2) conserving tropical forests and degraded peat lands, and 3) ensuring real reductions in GHG emissions associated with land use, land cover changes and deforestation. The program is aligned with governments at national and sub national levels and will contribute to the development of national REDD+ policies, strategies and regulations by addressing the key technical and financial barriers of entry which currently limit the supply of good quality and independently validated REDD+ demonstration projects. The program is building capacities at  national and sub national levels of government, non governmental organisations, private sector and communities to implement REDD+  projects by improving national REDD screening processes, learning by doing using a generic five stage (due diligence, feasibility, carbon development, validation and marketing) and ten step carbon development process, establishing links between project based, sub national and national forest carbon accounting systems, exploring options for benefit sharing mechanisms and communicating lessons learned.<br/>
The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), in collaboration with Rare Conservation, the Clinton Climate Initiative?Forestry, Yayasan Orangutan Indonesia (Yayorin) and Oranguan Foundation (UK), conducted a feasibility study assessing the potential for enhancing carbon stock in the eastern buffer zone (23 600 ha) of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve (LRWR), Central Kalimantan province. Beyond the current carbon stock and a projected baseline of ?business as usual?, assessment of current rights and livelihood strategies in the area is needed for study of ?additionality? (carbon stock increases above baseline attributable to project interventions), ?leakage? (negative impacts on carbon stocks outside the project area attributable to project interventions) and ?permanence? (or leakage in time). We used the RESFA (REDD/REALU Site-level Feasibility Appraisal1 as the framework for studying the key livelihoods, land-use change, carbon stock and tenure issues to develop prospective scenarios and impact predictions.<br/>
Overall feasibility was assessed through answers to five questions.<br/>
A) Who are the land users, what do they do and what alternative options exist for them?<br/>
B) Who has claims of ownership and legality of current land use, who not?<br/>
C) How much carbon is currently stored in the landscape, linked to land-use practices?<br/>
D) Where do the various land-use practices take place and how much are they
changing?<br/>
E) What can be done to reduce threats to carbon stocks and enhance carbon storage?
How can leakage be prevented, additionality be claimed and permanence made
likely?]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Joshi L, Janudianto , van Noordwijk M and Pradhan UP. Investment in carbon stocks in the eastern buffer zone of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve, Central Kalimantan province, Indonesia: a REDD+ feasibility study. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 91 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2516</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>37</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BL0037-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Where We Work</maintitle>
	<author>Andreas Wilkes, Beria Leimona, Emma Abasolo, Grace B.Villamor, Laxman Joshi, Lisa Fitzgerald, Matilda Palm, Ritesh Kumar and Rizki Pandu Permana</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>54</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[RUPES-Rewarding Upland poor for Environmental Services they provide-has become a well-known brand and trusted source of information about the complexity of environmental services rewards schemes.<br/>
The project was started in 2002 under the coordination of the World Agroforestry Centre (Southeast Asia Programme) through a funding partnership with the International Fund for Agricultural Development.<br/>
During its first phase (2002?2007), RUPES worked in 6 action research sites in 3 countries?Bungo, Singkarak and Sumberjaya in Indonesia; Bakun and Kalahan in the Philippines; Kulekhani in Nepal]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Wilkes A, Leimona B, Abasolo E, Villamor GB, Joshi L, Fitzgerald L, Palm M, Kumar R and Permana RP. Where We Work. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 54 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2515</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BC</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>309</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BC0309-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The Livelihood Impacts of Incentive Payments for Watershed Management in Cidanau Watershed, West Java, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona, Rachman Pasha and Nana Prayatna Rahadian</author>
	<editor>Luca Tacconi, Sango Mahanty and Helen Sulch</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Payments For Environmental Services, Forest Conservation And Climate Change. Livelihoods in the REDD?</secondtitle>
	<publisher>MPG Books Group</publisher>
	<publicationplace>United Kingdom</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>106-129</mainpages>
	<descript1>978 1 84980 299 4</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Payment for environmental services (PES) is now quite a well recognized approach in Asia. Interest and investment from international donors has enabled the testing of different PES mechanisms over the last decade, particularly those focusing on watershed protection and carbon sequestration. With the exception of China and Vietnam, where the schemes are staterun, schemes in Asia are generally small-scale, community level projects.<br/>
The case study presented in this chapter is located in Cidanau, Indonesia. The Cidanau watershed is one of the most important watersheds supplying the domestic and industrial water needs of Banten Province, Java Island, Indonesia. The watershed covers 22260 ha located between two regencies: Serang and Padeglang, and their six sub-districts. The Cidanau watershed also has a special role in biodiversity protection. In the base of the bowl-shaped Cidanau watershed lies the Rawa Danau Reserve-a 4200 ha nature reserve, which contains the only remaining lowland swamp forest in Java and has 131 endemic species. The reserve is important in the hydrological process, too, as the reservoir for the Cidanau River and its tributaries, which then flow into the Sunda Strait.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Leimona B, Pasha R and Rahadian NP. 2010. The Livelihood Impacts of Incentive Payments for Watershed Management in Cidanau Watershed, West Java, Indonesia. In: Tacconi L, Mahanty S and Suich H,eds. Payments For Environmental Services, Forest Conservation And Climate Change. Livelihoods in the REDD?. United Kingdom. : MPG Books Group. P. 106-129.</citation>
	<publicationid>2514</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>136</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0136-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>NTFPs as a source of livelihood diversification for local communities in the Batang Toru Orangutan Conservation Program</maintitle>
	<author>Jusupta Tarigan, James M Roshetko, Endri Martini and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working Paper no 118</edition>
	<totalpages>21</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Batang Toru, located in the northern part of Sumatran island, is one of the few remaining
areas to support populations of the Sumatran orangutan (<i>Pongo abelii</i>). The existence of an orangutan population of 400 in the area was documented through a <i>Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA)</i> (Singleton et. al., 2004). Recent studies estimate that the population may be 380 at the current time. Although the Batang Toru orangutan population is smaller, its threat from habitat loss is relatively low (below 2% annually). This low rate of habitat loss is the result of topographic features that limit access and traditional indigenous forest management systems that are sustainable and value healthy environments. Besides orangutans, the Batang Toru forest is also rich with other endemic plant and animal species (e.g. Dipterocarpaceae species (<i>Shorea spp., Anisoptera spp., Dipterocarpus spp.</i>) and Sumatran tiger). To the present time the gradient of landuse systems practiced by local communities in Batang Toru have been compatible with conservation of the area?s unique and globally important biodiversity. However, in the future, the expanding human population of Batang Toru may threat the forest and all of its components, if suitable livelihoods option are not identified and developed. In that context, we see a number of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) that are produced in Batang Toru forest systems (e.g. mixed tree gardens, agroforests, and forests) as having potential to diversify and secure viable livelihood options for the people of Batang Toru.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Sumatran Orangutan, Batang Toru, NTFPS, Livelihoods, Agroforest, Landuse</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Tarigan J, Roshetko JM, Martini E and Ekadinata A. 2010. NTFPs as a source of livelihood diversification for local communities in the Batang Toru Orangutan Conservation Program. Working Paper no 118Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 21 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2513</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>135</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0135-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Landscape dynamics over time and space from ecological perspective</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Working paper no 103</edition>
	<totalpages>74</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Land use and land cover changes driven by multiple factors have tremendous impact on
environmental services as well as livelihoods and economic development of people living in the landscapes and external to the landscapes. In particular for biodiversity, landscape configuration is at the very least as important as landscape composition by increasing fragmentation and reducing connectivity of habitat. Protected areas are necessary but not sufficient in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level for several reasons: (i) management and enforcement are often weak, (ii) protected areas are often delineated in remote, rough terrain areas which does not represent various ecoregions with various species assemblages and endemism, (iii) the extent of protected areas sometimes are not large enough to allow minimum viable population such that in the long run species extinction might continue to happen, (iv) protected areas without buffer zones and corridors can easily be isolated areas rather than integral part of a landscape. Multifunctional landscapes that accommodate conservation and development need to be considered as an integrated, rather than segregation, systems; this will allow us to achieve the objective of maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. Land use plan that aims to increase multifunctionality of landscapes should be informed by the current status of landscape composition and configuration, process of land use/cover changes in the past and future, areas that are vulnerable to changes in the future and options for intervention. The land use planning process should be conducted within a negotiation process among multiple stakeholders. This work provides some results to be used as a basis for negotiation, which are produced from the combination of tools from remote sensing, GIS and spatial analysis guided by ecological principles. The results provide data for further research as well as suggest follow-up research questions.<br/>
These analysis of five landscapes (Bungo in Indonesia, Viengkham in Laos, Manompana in Madagascar, Takamanda-Mone in Cameroon and East Usambara in Tanzania) using the same methodology and tool allows comparisons across sites. Deforestation rates and land use/cover changes across landscapes along with land use/cover changes are used to define the stage of forest transition; Takamanda-Mone, Viengkham, Manompana, East Usambara and Bungo is the ordered list from earliest to advanced stages. Spatial pattern of deforestation, depending on landscape topography, level of accessibilities and state of forest transition, either are concentrated in relatively flat areas in the landscape, follow encroachment pattern of primary forest block, along the transportation network, or expansion of existing settlement. Combining these spatial patterns of deforestation with changes in landscape configuration, especially at sub-landscape level (quantified by selected indices), we can identify vulnerable areas in the future such that options to reduce risks can be discussed and negotiated within land use planning processes.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Landscape composition, configuration, matrix, connectivity, fragmentation, drivers of land
use changes, multifunctional landscapes</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Dewi S and Ekadinata A. 2010. Landscape dynamics over time and space from ecological perspective. Working paper no 103Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 74 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2512</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>58</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0058-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Reducing emissions through agroforestry</maintitle>
	<author>Festus K. Akinnifesi</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>media Perkebunan</secondtitle>
	<volume>85</volume>
	<mainpages>26</mainpages>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Akinnifesi FK. "Reducing emissions through agroforestry. "media Perkebunan. Vol.85: 26]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2511</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>57</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0057-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Powerful reward for erosion control</maintitle>
	<author>Kate Langford</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Media Perkebunan</secondtitle>
	<volume>85</volume>
	<mainpages>24-25</mainpages>
	<region>Head Quarters</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Langford K. "Powerful reward for erosion control. "Media Perkebunan. Vol.85: 24-25]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2510</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>56</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0056-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Perlu keseriusan dalam tangani sawit Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Suseno Budidarsono</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Media Perkebunan</secondtitle>
	<volume>85</volume>
	<mainpages>22-23</mainpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Budidarsono S. "Perlu keseriusan dalam tangani sawit Indonesia. "Media Perkebunan. Vol.85: 22-23]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2509</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>145</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0145-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>A Teacher's Guide on Agroforestry Landscape Analysis: Curricular Framework and Case Study Materials</maintitle>
	<author>SEANAFE</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>50</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[This guide is intended primarily for university lecturers but could also be used by
Extensionists and community development workers who wish to conduct training
on the subjectmatter.<br/>
This guide is divided into three major sections, namely: 1) The SEANAFE's
Agroforestry Landscape Analysis Project Overview; 2) The SEANAFE's Agroforestry
Landscape Analysis Curricular Framework; and the 3) Country Teaching Case Study
Materials.<br/>
Section 1 provides a brief background on SEANAFE AFLA Project highlighting the
salient processes through which this guidewas generated.<br/>
Section 2 discusses in detail the components of the AFLA curricular framework.<br/>
Section 3 presents the country cases and offers ways to effectively use them for
teaching AFLA. It provides suggestions for encouraging critical thinking among
students, including guide questions and discussions, suggested teaching activities
and references. This, however, should not limit the users. Instead, they are
encouraged to further explore the other potential applications of the cases as
teachingmaterials.<br/>
The curricular framework does not claim to be complete and comprehensive.
However, SEANAFE considers it adequate to help enhance the knowledge, skills,
and appreciation of students and other users on AFLA toward a more sustainable
use and management of natural resources. The teaching case study materials also
do not cover all the aspects of AFLA as a result of the kind of available data gathered
by the country teams from their respective case study sites. Thus, users are
encouraged to make assumptions about information absent fromthe cases and/or
use other relevant cases to help teach AFLA concepts fully.<br/>
The guide assumes that the users have considerable experience in using case study
as a teaching method. First timers to this approach are encouraged to read the
Notes for Teachers well in advance before giving the case study materials to their
students. The effectiveness of the case study materials relies on howwell the users
have grounded themselves on its suggested use and internalized the basic
information therein.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>SEANAFE. 2010. A Teacher's Guide on Agroforestry Landscape Analysis: Curricular Framework and Case Study Materials. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 50 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2508</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>392</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0392-11</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Stewardship agreement to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): case study from Lubuk Beringin?s Hutan Desa, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Ratna Akiefnawati, Grace B.Villamor, Farid Zulfikar, Iman Budisetiawan, Elok Mulyoutami, Asep Ayat and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Forestry Review</secondtitle>
	<publisher>The Commonwealth Forestry Association</publisher>
	<volume>12</volume>
	<edition>4</edition>
	<mainpages>349-360</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Contested rules between the state and local communities over use and protection of forest affect environmental services and livelihood options in Indonesia?s forest margins. Success in forest protection and emission reduction (REDD) requires conflict resolution. The recent village forest (<i>Hutan Desa</i>) regulation by the Minister of Forestry (P.49/Menhut-II/2008) details how to reconcile forest management targets and livelihood interests of forest-edge villages within the framework of a permanent forest estate. Lubuk Beringin in Bungo District, Jambi Province became the first village in Indonesia to secure such an agreement. Our analysis of process, stakes and social capital bridging local, district and national scales of <i>Hutan Desa</i> aims to assist in reducing transaction costs for wider application. Streamlining of rules is needed
to make <i>Hutan Desa</i> a viable part of REDD schemes at relevant scale, and to support locally appropriate mitigation action as part of national strategies, and as co-investment in stewardship for local, national and global benefits.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>action research, community forest management, Hutan Desa, REDD+, village forest</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Akiefnawati R, Villamor GB, Zulfikar F, Budisetiawan I, Mulyoutami E, Ayat A and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Stewardship agreement to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD): case study from Lubuk Beringin’s Hutan Desa, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. International Forestry Review. 12(4):P. 349-360.</citation>
	<publicationid>2507</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>TD</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>162</cnposition>
	<callnumber>TD0162-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Prediksi perubahan neraca air dengan model GenRiver</maintitle>
	<author>Prasetyo Nugroho</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Universitas Gadjah Mada</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Yogyakarta</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>109</totalpages>
	<descript1>Program Studi Ilmu Kehutanan Universitas Gadjah Mada</descript1>
	<descript2>Master of Science</descript2>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) merupakan satu kesatuan ekosistem yang terdiri dari komponen biotis dan abiotis dan tidak dapat dipisahkan antar komponen satu dengan lainnya serta memiliki karakteristik yang khas, baik secara hidrologi, penutupan lahan, sosial budaya dan ekonomi yang melingkupinya. Daerah aliran sungai memainkan fungsi dan peran dasarnya sebagai daerah yang menerima, menampung dan mengalirkan air melalui outlet tunggal. Akan tetapi peran dan fungsi DAS tersebut dipengaruhi oleh perubahan penutupan lahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Model Hidrologi GenRiver dan memprediksi perubahan neraca air Sub DAS Goseng dengan simulasi kondisi penutupan lahan yang berbeda.<br/>
Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) merupakan satu kesatuan ekosistem yang terdiri dari komponen biotis dan abiotis dan tidak dapat dipisahkan antar komponen satu dengan lainnya serta memiliki karakteristik yang khas, baik secara hidrologi, penutupan lahan, sosial budaya dan ekonomi yang melingkupinya. Daerah aliran sungai memainkan fungsi dan peran dasarnya sebagai daerah yang menerima, menampung dan mengalirkan air melalui outlet tunggal. Akan tetapi peran dan fungsi DAS tersebut dipengaruhi oleh perubahan penutupan lahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Model Hidrologi GenRiver dan memprediksi perubahan neraca air Sub DAS Goseng dengan simulasi kondisi penutupan lahan yang berbeda.<br/>
Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah dengan menggunakan dan menganalisis model Generic Riverflow (GenRiver) serta menggunakan simulasi perubahan penutupan lahan untuk mengetahui perubahan neraca air di kawasan Sub DAS Goseng. Perangkat bantuan yang digunakan dalam model ini yaitu menggunakan Stella sebagai software yang dihubungkan dengan file microsoft excel. Parameter yang dipertimbangkan dalam model ini yaitu data klimatologi, bentuk lahan, tanah, geologi dan penutupan lahan.]]></abstract>
	<keywords>GenRiver, neraca air, Sub DAS Goseng, buffering indicator</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Nugroho P. 2010. Prediksi perubahan neraca air dengan model GENRIVER. Yogyakarta. : Universitas Gadjah Mada. 109 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2506</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>391</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0391-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Accessibility Factors and Conservation Forest Designation Affecting Rattan Cane Harvesting in Lambusango Forest, Buton, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Atiek Widayati, Samantha Jones and Bruce Carlisle</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Human Ecology</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer Science+Business Media B.V</publisher>
	<volume>38</volume>
	<edition>6</edition>
	<mainpages>731-746</mainpages>
	<abstract>Rattan cane is an important non-timber forest product (NTFP) harvested from Indonesian tropical forests. However, the extraction of NTFPs such as rattan cane may
conflict with forest conservation efforts. A better understanding of harvesting practices can help assess the extent of this conflict and guide forest management decisions.
This study assesses the accessibility factors that influence rattan cane harvesting levels in Lambusango Forest, Buton Island, Indonesia, and whether the harvesting of rattan cane is affected by the designation of conservation areas. To this end, the analysis adopts participatory mapping, Geographic Information Systems and a questionnaire survey and employs multiple regressions and analysis of covariance.
The results show that accessibility, particularly slope and distance, can play a role in the quantity of rattan canes harvested. The presence of conservation forest does not significantly affect rattan cane harvesting levels. This could be due to limited awareness of the harvesters going to the vicinity of the designated conservation areas and mixed sentiments towards conservation efforts due to the long tradition of forest dwelling and harvesting activities. The study concludes that the successful establishment and management of conservation areas require consideration of the specificity of the local context such as the abundance of forest resources, accessibility and historical forest-people interactions, in addition to biological factors.</abstract>
	<keywords>NTFP. Rattan cane harvesting . Accessibility . Conservation forest . Buton Island</keywords>
	<notes>DOI 10.1007/s10745-010-9358-7</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Widayati A, Jones S and Carlisle B. 2010. Accessibility Factors and Conservation Forest Designation Affecting Rattan Cane Harvesting in Lambusango Forest, Buton, Indonesia. Human Ecology. 38(6):P. 731-746.</citation>
	<publicationid>2505</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>267</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0267-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>An assessment of opportunities for reducing emissions from all land uses Vietnam preparing for REDD final national report</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, Do Trong Hoan, Meine van Noordwijk, Pham Thu Thuy, Matilda Palm, To Xuan Phuc, Doan Diem, Nguyen Thanh Xuan and Hoang Thi Van Anh</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>85</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[This report presents results from a project carried out in Vietnam to assess the potential of reducing carbon emissions from all land sues, rather than only from deforestation and degradation of forests.<br/>
The study explored the links between reducing emisisons from all land uses and nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs), as well as market-based approaches to the problem.<br/>
The study found that reducing emissions from all land uses in Vietnam increases the possibility of sustaining a future carbon emissions reduction scheme because it addresses an entire landscape, not only forest, and strengthens the participation of all land users, including indigenous people.<br/>
There are challenges to any scheme that aims to reduce emisisons from all land uses. These include adopting the right methods, obtaining reliable data, and legal and political issues.<br/>
The report recommends that reducing emissions from all land uses would be the most effective approach and should be implemented using cross-sectoral land-use planning and co-covernance that includes equitable involvement of government, private companies and smallholders.]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Do Trong H, van Noordwijk M, Thuy PT, Palm M, Phuc TX, Doan D, Thanh Xuan N and Thi Van Anh H. An assessment of opportunities for reducing emissions from all land uses Vietnam preparing for REDD final national report. Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2010. 85 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2504</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>55</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0055-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pak Usub: dari Serumpun berkarya untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar sungai Lamandau</maintitle>
	<author>Janudianto and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>14-15</mainpages>
	<abstract>Berada di bagian selatan Pulau Kalimantan, tepatnya di salah satu desa di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat, M. Subeli atau yang akrab dipanggil Pak Usub berkarya demi mensejahterakan masyarakatnya. Laki-laki kelahiran Barabai, Kalimantan Selatan 51 tahun silam ini merupakan salah satu dari sekian banyak pendatang yang mencoba
mengadu nasib di Serumpun, Desa Tanjung Putri. Anak kedua dari lima bersaudara ini merupakan salah seorang tokoh tani di dua kelompok saat ini, Kelompok Tani Serumpun dan Kelompok Tani Serumpun Padi. Bapak dua anak ini pandai berbicara dan
senang sekali bercerita, tentunya dengan logat Banjar yang kental.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Janudianto and Rahayu S. "Pak Usub: dari Serumpun berkarya untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat sekitar sungai Lamandau. "Kiprah Agroforestri 7. Vol.3: 14-15]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2503</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>54</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0054-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Sistem Wanatani: masih tetap idola pengelola kebun kopi</maintitle>
	<author>Kurniatun Hairiah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>12-13</mainpages>
	<abstract>?Wanatani kopi tetap idola bagi pengelola kopi di era pemanasan global, karena sistem ini menyediakan jasa lingkungan lewat perannya dalam mempertahankan populasi 'luwak', si pemetik jitu buah kopi, mengendalikan populasi nematoda parasit tumbuhan serta menjaga kondisi tanah tetap gembur, menyerap dan menyimpan karbon, serta mengatur tata air?, itulah catatan ringkasku selama mengikuti Simposium Kopi.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Hairiah K. "Sistem Wanatani: masih tetap idola pengelola kebun kopi. "Kiprah Agroforestri 7. Vol.3: 12-13]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2502</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>53</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0053-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Tembawang: bukan sekedar sistem agroforestri</maintitle>
	<author>Bambang Soeharto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>10-11</mainpages>
	<abstract>Tembawang atau sering disebut sebagai agroforest tembawang adalah suatu bentuk sistem penggunaan lahan yang terdiri dari berbagai jenis tumbuhan, mulai dari pohon-pohon besar berdiameter lebih dari 100 sentimeter hingga tumbuhan bawah sejenis
rumput-rumputan. Sistem ini dikelola dengan teknik-teknik tertentu sesuai dengan kearifan lokal mereka dan mengikuti aturan-aturan sosial sehingga membentuk keanekaragaman yang kompleks menyerupai ekosistem hutan alam.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Soeharto B. "Tembawang: bukan sekedar sistem agroforestri. "Kiprah Agroforestri 7. Vol.3: 10-11]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2501</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>52</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0052-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Hutan sagu: potensinya dalam REDD+</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu and Degi Harja</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>8-9</mainpages>
	<abstract>REDD adalah suatu upaya penurunan emisi dari sektor deforestasi dan degradasi hutan  yang diinisiasi pada COP 12 di Bali tahun 2007, yang artinya penebangan hutan dan alih
guna hutan harus dihindari dalam upaya menurunkan emisi gas rumah kaca*. Seperti telah kita ketahui bahwa meningkatnya konsentrasi gas rumah kaca di atmosfir memberikan sumbangan yang sangat berarti dalam pemanasan global akhir-akhir ini.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Rahayu S and Harja D. "Hutan sagu: potensinya dalam REDD+. "Kiprah Agroforestri 7. Vol.3: 8-9]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2500</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>51</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0051-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Memahami rantai perdagangan kayu jati</maintitle>
	<author>Aulia Perdana</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>5-7</mainpages>
	<abstract>?Mengapa kita diperlakukan seperti pencuri ketika mengirim kayu, padahal
semua persyaratan dan legalitas penebangan sudah dipenuhi??. Pertanyaan yang
dilontarkan oleh seorang pedagang kayu jati di kota Wonosari, Gunung Kidul ini
menyulut berbagai pertanyaan kritis lainnya yang menuntut jawaban lebih
mendalam. Tulisan ini mencoba menjawab pertanyaan tersebut dengan
mengungkap rantai perdagangan jati dari petani hingga ke pedagang kayu yang
saling berlomba mencari keuntungan diantara biaya-biaya yang tak terduga.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Perdana A. "Memahami rantai perdagangan kayu jati. "Kiprah Agroforestri 7. Vol.3: 5-7]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2499</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>46</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0046-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 7</maintitle>
	<author>Aulia Perdana, Bambang Soeharto, Degi Harja, Elok Mulyoutami, Janudianto, Kurniatun Hairiah and Subekti Rahayu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>3</edition>
	<mainpages>1-16</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Sebuah kisah tentang Pak Mawardi, pencari lele dari desa Aloe Bateung Broek, Desa Kuala Seumayam, mengeluhkan sulitnya mencari lele akibat banyaknya lahan gambut yang dikeringkan dan diubah menjadi kebun, disajikan sebagai pembuka KIPRAH edisi ini.<br/>
Pemahaman alur jual beli kayu jati di tingkat petani masih merupakan kendala saat ini. Artikel kedua membawa kita kepemahaman untuk mencari nilai rantai perdagangan kayu jati, berikut peraturan dan kebijakan yang berlaku.<br/>
Sebuah OPINI mengenai ?bagaimana hutan sagu berpotensi dalam REDD+ karena dapat menyerap karbon?? Selain sumber bahan makanan pokok bagi masyarakat Papua, juga merupakan habitat keanekaragaman hayati, yang tumbuh alami selayaknya hutan alam yang memiliki peluang sebagai penyerap karbon.<br/>
Masih dengan artikel menarik untuk diulas yaitu tentang agroforest tembawang, di Kalimantan Barat, yang dalam pengelolaannya masih dikelola secara adat masyarakat Suku Dayak. Penulis menyajikannya dengan cukup detail yang mencakup tiga hal utama dalam aspek konservasi dan nilai-nilai sosial budaya yang luhur.<br/>
Kopi luak... siapa yang tidak kenal dengan nikmatnya kopi ini. Dengan harga jual yang menggiurkan karena termahal di dunia. Meskipun biji kopi berkualitas tinggi ini diambil dari sisa kotoran luwak, namun kopi ini menjadi begitu masyur dikalangan penikmat kopi. Berdasarkan penelitian terakhir, hasil panen biji kopi oleh luwak yang dikandangkan tidak sebaik kualitas kopi yang dipanen oleh luwak liar. Ikuti cerita uniknya dalam liputan simposium nasional yang diselenggarakan di pulau Bali, Oktober
lalu.<br/>
?Ini sebuah awal contoh yang baik dari suatu usaha pertanian padi di lahan pasang surut. Dengan teknologi sederhana mampu mencegah lahan dari banjir atau luapan air pasang. Hasil enam ton gabah kering panen per hektar sebuah hal yang luar biasa? sambut Akhmad Yadi, Kepala Dinas Pertanian dan Peternakan kepada Pak Usub, seorang penebang kayu yang berubah haluan menjadi petani peladang menetap yang menularkan ilmunya kepada masyarakat sekitarnya. Rubrik PROFIL TOKOH yang bisa menjadi contoh untuk kita dan sekaligus sebagai artikel terakhir KIPRAH edisi ini.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Perdana A, Soeharto B, Harja D, Mulyoutami E, Janudianto , Hairiah K and Rahayu S. 2010. Kiprah Agroforestri 7. In: Rahayu S and Mulyoutami E,eds. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2, GRP 3 , GRP 4 , GRP 5 , GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2498</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>16</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0016-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Mau melangkah ke mana pengelolaan hutan sesaot?</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra, R. Yana Buana and Noviana Khususiyah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 09</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Hutan Sesaot, terletak di bagian barat Taman Nasional Rinjani, memiliki luas 5 950 ha dan merupakan tangkapan air dari DAS Dodokan. Secara administrasi, hutan ini terletak di Kecamatan Narmada dan Lingsar, Kabupaten Lombok Barat, dan diapit oleh 4 desa yaitu Sesaot, Lebah Sempage, Sedau dan Batu Mek ar. Berdasar k an SK Menter i Per tanian No. 756/Kpts/Um/1982, status dan fungsi hutan Sesaot adalah hutan lindung. Penunjukan ini didasari atas pertimbangan hutan ini memiliki fungsi penting sebagai sumber mata air bagi irigasi pertanian skala besar serta untuk kebutuhan
rumah tangga, khususnya di Kota Mataram, Kabupaten Lombok Barat dan sebagian Kabupaten Lombok Tengah.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Galudra G, Buana RY and Khususiyah N. 2010. Mau melangkah ke mana pengelolaan hutan sesaot?. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2497</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>15</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0015-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam (SL-PSDA): upaya peningkatan kapasitas LMDH dalam pembangunan hutan melalui PHBM (di KPH Malang)</maintitle>
	<author>Widianto, Noviana Khususiyah and Iva Dewi Lestariningsih</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 03</edition>
	<totalpages>6</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM) merupakan suatu pendekatan dalam kebijakan pengelolaan hutan produksi berbasis kemitraan dengan masyarakat. Dalam
kemitraan tersebut dibentuk suatu lembaga masyarakat yang dinamakan Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH). Pendekatan PHBM ini tidak muncul secara tiba-tiba, tetapi melalui proses perkembangan yang panjang dengan berbagai kendala. Salah satu kendala dalam menerapkan PHBM adalah keragaman pemahaman stakeholder terhadap konsep dan implementasi PHBM di jajaran internal Perum Perhutani, mulai dari pimpinan, staf sampai ke pelaksana paling bawah di lapangan.<br/><br/>
Salah satu metode yang telah terbukti dapat membantu mengembangkan kapasitas masyarakat dalam berbagai program pembangunan adalah pendekatan sekolah lapangan (SL), yang dalam hal ini adalah sekolah lapangan untuk pengelolaan sumberdaya alam (SL-PSDA).]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Widianto, Khususiyah N and Lestariningsih ID. 2010. Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam (SL-PSDA): upaya peningkatan kapasitas LMDH dalam pembangunan hutan melalui PHBM (di KPH Malang). Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 6 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2496</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>14</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0014-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Emissions Embodied in Trade (EET) and Land use in Tropical Forest Margins</maintitle>
	<author>Peter Akong Minang, Meine van Noordwijk, P Meyfroidt, Fahmuddin Agus and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB Policy Brief no 17</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Increasing proportions of land use change responsible for emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and agriculture in developing countries is associated with commodities meant for export, hence the concept of Emissions Embodied in Trade-
EET.<br/><br/>
As many corporations, countries and consumers embrace carbon footprint labelling and advocate for ?greener? commodities, there is potential for reducing emissions from land use change in the humid and sub-humid tropics. Yet, current debate on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation ? REDD+ has not considered the potential implications of EET.<br/><br/>
In this brief, we present and briefly reflect on (a) how emission reductions may induce cross-border land use displacements; (b) how market demand for ?greener? commodities and consumer pressure on some tropical commodities can shape behaviour of land use agents and influence emissions; and (c) the policy implications that result from EET.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Minang PA, van Noordwijk M, Meyfroidt P, Agus F and Dewi S. 2010. Emissions Embodied in Trade (EET) and Land use in Tropical Forest Margins. Nairobi, Kenya. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2495</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>266</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0266-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Moving Beyond REDD: Reducing Emissions from All Land Uses in Nepal</maintitle>
	<author>Laxman Joshi, Naya Sharma Paudel, Hemanta Ojha, Dil Bahadur Khatri, Keshav Kanel, Rajendra Pradhan, Bhaskar Karky, Ujjwal P. Pradhan and Seema Karki</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>88</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Nepal's stake in reducing rmissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) is
high owing to its vulnerability to both climate variability and any mitigation strategies
aimed at reducing emission through forest conservation. Because of its natural
resource-based economy, REDD and similar mechanisms will have huge implications in
Nepal (potential benefits and risks). Since the large population relies heavily on natural
resources, where strategies for mitigation and adaptation overlap, REDD and similar
mechanisms must fall within the broader framework of adaptation. Existing frameworks
must be broadened in order to benefit the Nepalese people: rather than focussing
narrowly on additionality for carbon financing, overall enhancement of forest must be
taken into account. The criteria of permanence and no leakage are also difficult to meet,
looking at the dynamic economic and livelihoods contexts that affect the values and
choices of local people dependent on forest.<br/><br/>
Considering these conditions, Nepal would not benefit from REDD alone and therefore
should be lobbying for REDD+, which includes enhancing carbon stocks, and even
REDD++ which looks at carbon in all land uses. A critical issue is that since millions of
small farmers and other rural inhabitants interact with land in a variety of ways for
multiple objectives, a simple distinction of 'forest' or 'non-forest' has little relevance. The attempt is for payments for sustainable land use with productive conservation where net biological productivity will be enhanced, while also allowing flexibility for local
forest owners to adapt to changing conditions affecting needs, preferences and values.<br/><br/>
There are limitations to a sole focus on forest-based mitigation approaches such as
REDD and hence the proposition of a broader concept of reducing emissions from all
land uses (REALU). The narrow focus on forest-based REDD omits agriculture and
therefore misses huge opportunities. Similarly, it fails to address many technical issues,
such as leakage and permanence, and so would be unable to effectively curb emissions
in the long term. A more comprehensive approach including all land uses will minimise
technical errors and effectively reduce emissions. This report attempts to resolve the
apparent dichotomy between adaptation and mitigation by highlighting how
sustainable resources management simultaneously reduces emissions, enhances food
security and increases ecosystem resilience. The mosaic of farm and forests and
traditional integrated farming provides a unique context where mitigation and
adaptation go together.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Joshi L, Paudel NS, Ojha H, Khatri DB, Kanel K, Pradhan R, Karky B, Pradhan UP and Karki S. Moving Beyond REDD: Reducing Emissions from All Land Uses in Nepal. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 88 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2494</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>299</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0299-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle><![CDATA[Conflict, Cooperation, & Collective Action: Land use, water rights, and water scarcity in Manupali watershed, southern Philippines]]></maintitle>
	<author>Caroline Duque-Piñon, Delia Catacutan, Beria Leimona, Emma Abasolo, Meine van Noordwijk and Lydia Tiongco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>CAPRi Workshop on Collective Action, Property Rights, and Conflict in Natural Resources Management</secondtitle>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Phillipines</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>1-17</mainpages>
	<abstract>Sustaining the environmental, social and economic development in Manupali watershed in southern Philippines is highly dependent on fair allocation of water use rights and judicious utilization of water as a scarce resource. There are many stakeholders and water users: smallholder farmers, indigenous people, multi-national companies, the local government, National Irrigation Administration, and the National Power Corporation. As demand for water outstrips supply, conflict arises between different user-groups over who can use water and how much each can use. This paper reports on initial results of on-going studies that examine water rights and land use change, to negotiate for better co-investment in managing watershed. A key issue in Manupali is the overlap in ?water rights?, which is a privilege the government grants to use and
further appropriate water. To avoid hostile confrontation between different user-groups and to manage competition of water use, some user-groups came up with voluntary agreements for water rights sharing. Viewed in terms of cooperation and collective action, these voluntary agreements facilitated conflict management of a disputed natural resource, but fairness and equity dimensions are in question, as the
cooperating user groups extract benefits from non-cooperators who may suffer the consequence of protecting the upper watershed to maintain water supply. Supported by watershed hydrological data on water balance and its land use patterns, this paper argued that collective action at watershed scale is needed to ensure that benefits are fairly shared by both water users and producers.</abstract>
	<keywords>Water rights, water allocation, water conflict, cooperation, collective action</keywords>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Duque-Piñon C, Catacutan D, Leimona B, Abasolo E, van Noordwijk M and Tiongco L. 2010. Conflict, Cooperation, & Collective Action: Land use, water rights, and water scarcity in Manupali watershed, southern Philippines. CAPRi Workshop on Collective Action, Property Rights, and Conflict in Natural Resources Management. Los Banos, Phillipines. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. ]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2492</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>LE</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>172</cnposition>
	<callnumber>LE0172-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Analysis of Land Use and Cover Trajectory (ALUCT)</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<abstract>Analysis of Land Use and Cover Trajectory (ALUCT) can go beyond direct visual interpretation of geogle earth and quantify change. ALUCT has four stages work flow as follow: (1) Clarification of the questions; (2) Image acquisition and pre-processing; (3) Image classification based on ground-truth sample points and/or pre-established spatial patterns; and (4) Post interpretation analysis focussed on the research questions of interest. This tool is an important part of several of the TUL-SEA Tools, including the RaCSA, RHA and RABA (rapid appraisal of carbon stocks, hydrology and agrobiodiversity, respectively) methods. It also forms the basis of scenario studies (FALLOW), land tenure claim appraisal (RATA) and analysis of the drivers of land use change (DriLUC).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S and Ekadinata A. 2010. Analysis of Land Use and Cover Trajectory (ALUCT). [Leaflet].Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2491</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>LE</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>171</cnposition>
	<callnumber>LE0171-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>FlowPer: Indicator of Watershed Quality</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk and Lisa Tanika</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<abstract>In the analysis of watershed functions, we deal with complex factors that influence processes and patterns in the landscape that ultimately translate a temporal pattern of rainfall into a temporal pattern of stream flow, which aggregates up to a river. Downstream stakeholders start from what they want to see (?perfectly regular flow of clean water?) and observe a pattern of stream and river flow that doesn?t match their expectations. They search for interventions in the ?anthropogenic? groups of causes (deforestation, land degradation), but need to understand the potential reach of such interventions, given the geological and climatic background. In the absence of knowledge of what happens upstream, an observer of river flow can deduce a fair amount of information from a time series of river flow data. The FlowPer model is focused on that. It can serve two functions: 1) summarize the key parameters that downstream stakeholders can observe on the flow pattern, for example, as a basis for conditional rewards for providing environmental services; and 2) serve as a parsimonious (parameter-sparse) ?null model? that allows quantification of the increments in model prediction that is achieved with spatially explicit models (with parameterization first rather than parameter tuning to the data).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M and Tanika L. 2010. FlowPer: Indicator of Watershed Quality. [Leaflet].Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2490</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>390</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0390-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Potential of Community-Based Forest Management to Mitigate Climate Change in the Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Rodel D. Lasco, Remedios S. Evangelista and Florencia B Pulhin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Small-scale Forestry</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2010</publisher>
	<volume>9</volume>
	<edition>4</edition>
	<mainpages>429-443</mainpages>
	<abstract>Community-based forest management (CBFM) is the principal strategy in managing inhabited ?forest land? in the Philippines. It involves the participation of local communities in various forestry activities to achieve sustainable forestry, advance social justice and improve socioeconomic welfare, and promote a stable and healthy environment. This paper analyses the potential benefits of agroforestry farms in CBFM sites to mitigate climate change. The incorporation of trees in farms and landscapes has led to enhanced carbon storage and sequestration. Half a million hectares of agroforestry farms in CBFM sites in the Philippines are estimated to store 25 MtC while sequestering 2.7 MtC annually. Lessons are drawn from three carbon sequestration projects under development using CBFM as the main approach. Income from carbon credits is not sufficient to recover the cost of tree planting. The transaction costs of forestry CDM projects are substantial and could prove to be the greatest barrier to project fruition. Government institutions must find ways to encourage project developers by simplifying rules and regulations for forestry carbon projects. Forest definition must be assessed. Project developers and the government could also explore the voluntary carbon market which is more flexible than the CDM market. Policy and technical studies must be conducted to ascertain the potential of the REDD for CBFM sites in the country.</abstract>
	<keywords>Community-based forest management, Carbon credits, Clean development mechanism</keywords>
	<notes>DOI 10.1007/s11842-010-9132-0</notes>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lasco RD, Evangelista RS and Pulhin FB. 2010. Potential of Community-Based Forest Management to Mitigate Climate Change in the Philippines. Small-scale Forestry. 9(4):P. 429-443.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2489</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>281</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0281-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>From open access to common pool resource: effect of organic certification of NTFP in</maintitle>
	<author>Yan Mei, Mithoefer Dagmar, Yang Yanping and Huang Jiacong</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mei Y, Dagmar M, Yanping Y and Jiacong H. From open access to common pool resource: effect of organic certification of NTFP in. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<publicationid>2488</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>280</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0280-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Participatory agroforestry development in DPR Korea</maintitle>
	<author>Xu Jianchu and Jun He</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Xu Jianchu and He J. Participatory agroforestry development in DPR Korea. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2487</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>279</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0279-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The role of tree crops in local adaptations to climate variability in the Himalayas: Case studies in China, Nepal and Pakistan</maintitle>
	<author>Yufang Su, Juliet Lu, Sujata Manandhar and Ashiq Ahmad Khan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Yufang S, Lu J, Manandhar S and Khan AA. The role of tree crops in local adaptations to climate variability in the Himalayas: Case studies in China, Nepal and Pakistan. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2486</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>278</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0278-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>China?s Transition to Sustainable Agriculture: Understanding Fertilizer Use in Yunnan Province, China</maintitle>
	<author>Yunju Li, Fredrich Kahrl, David Roland-Holst, Su Yufang and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Yunju L, Kahrl F, Roland-Holst D, Yufang S and Xu Jianchu . China’s Transition to Sustainable Agriculture: Understanding Fertilizer Use in Yunnan Province, China. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2485</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>277</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0277-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Redefining priorities and reassigning responsibilities for forest management  in Doi Mae Salong, Northern Thailand</maintitle>
	<author>Sona Shakya and Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Shakya S and Schmidt-Vogt D. Redefining priorities and reassigning responsibilities for forest management  in Doi Mae Salong, Northern Thailand. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2484</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>276</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0276-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Land Use Mapping by Remote Sensing with Object-based Method in Upper Mekong Region</maintitle>
	<author>Chen Huafang, Philip Beckschafer, Yu Haiying, Yunju Li, Sha Wen and Liu Wenjun</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Huafang C, Beckschafer P, Haiying Y, Yunju L, Wen S and Wenjun L. Land Use Mapping by Remote Sensing with Object-based Method in Upper Mekong Region. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2483</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>275</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0275-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Three rivers rangeland carbon sequestration project</maintitle>
	<author>Andreas Wilkes, Zhang Zhicai and Wang Shiping</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China</publisher>
	<publicationplace>China</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Wilkes A, Zhicai Z and Shiping W. Three rivers rangeland carbon sequestration project. : Science Forum 2010China. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) China. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2482</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>274</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0274-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Can REDD payment alone protect the forest?</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, Do Trong Hoan, Matilda Palm, Nguyen Thanh Xuan, Doan Diem, Hoang Thi Van Anh, Meine van Noordwijk and Peter Akong Minang</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Data suggests that Asia has made a net increase in forest area ? largely due to the reported increase for China ? but still contains the country with the largest net emission (Indonesia).<br/> Vietnam can be seen as a ?nutshell? of this situation, with parts of the
country that resemble Indonesia?s net deforestation pattern, and parts that resemble China?s net increase in forest area (and reduction in forests carbon-stock). <br/> Vietnam was one of the first countries to turn the corner on ?forest transition? without having first completely depleted the forest. However, while reported forest area increased, net emissions continued to rise as carbon-rich forest was lost and plantations of low carbon-stock were added.<br/> Current REDD+ activities in Vietnam mainly focus on Reference Emission Level; Monitoring, Reporting and Verification; Benefit Distribution System and capacity building.]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Do Trong H, Palm M, Thanh Xuan N, Doan D, Thi Van Anh H, van Noordwijk M and Minang PA. Can REDD payment alone protect the forest?. : Science Forum 2010Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2481</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>273</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0273-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pathways for Agroforestry Development in North-West Vietnam</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, Marc Dumas-Johansen, Ann Degrande, Luu thi Thu Giang and Antoine Kalinganire</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Deforestation and land degradation in connection with shifting cultivation and mono-cropping is a major issue in the northwestern uplands of Vietnam. Fallow cycling in shifting cultivation has been reduced or is non-existent, exacerbated by an increasing population, greater land allocation and strong market liberation and demand. Mono-cropping of maize, upland rice, cassava, teak and currently also rubber is expanding (Photo 1), mainly for economic purposes. On forest land, farmers cut down trees and either plant food crops or sell the timber. As a consequence, during 1990?1995, forest cover was reduced to around 10% and was highly fragmented with a significant loss of biodiversity. Soil erosion owing to unsustainable sloping cultivation is alarming (68 t/ha/year under maize in Yen Son district, Upland program 2010).<br/>Research ideas for bringing trees back to the landscape for more sustainable farming are under development by the World Agroforestry Centre Vietnam and its national partners as a part of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) program in the area. The role of trees in increasing income to local farmers, either directly or indirectly through livestock, and at the same time improving soil and water quality, is a focus of the program. A scoping study has been being carried out by the Centre?s interdisciplinary team that includes international and national experts . Begining in May 2010, we have worked in three provinces, with a focus on Son La province (Map 1). The methods used are reviews, interviews, field visits and workshops with local stakeholders including local government, research institutes, universities and farmers]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Dumas-Johansen M, Degrande A, Thu Giang Lt and Kalinganire A. Pathways for Agroforestry Development in North-West Vietnam. : Science Forum 2010Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2480</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>272</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0272-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Bundling of payments/rewards for environmental services A viable incentive system under development in the uplands of Northern Vietnam</maintitle>
	<author>Hoang Minh Ha, Dinh Ngoc Lan, Hoang Van Giap and Nguyen van Nam</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Hanoi, Vietnam</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Mechanisms for Payments for Environmental Services (PES) and Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are developing in the world in general and in Vietnam in particular. It is clear in Vietnam that single payments for water as an environmental service from forest, or for forest carbon through a REDD mechanism, gives forest owners insufficient income, thereby limiting livelihood improvements and forest protection.<br/> A viable incentive system that contains rewards, payments and livelihood options??bundling? payments for ecosystem services or ?co-investment for PES??being developed in Ba Be district, Bac Kan province, is an option to this limitation (Photo 1). Bac Kan was chosen owing to it 40% poverty rate, 55% forest cover and complex landscape .]]></abstract>
	<region>Vietnam</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Hoang MH, Dinh NL, Van Giap H and van Nam N. Bundling of payments/rewards for environmental services A viable incentive system under development in the uplands of Northern Vietnam. : Science Forum 2010Hanoi, Vietnam. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) - Vietnam. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2479</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>271</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0271-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Cutting Propagation of Rare Tree Species for Forest Restoration in Northern Thailand</maintitle>
	<author>Anantika Ratnamhin, Stephen Elliott and Prasit Wangpakapattanawong</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre  (ICRAF) Thailand</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Thailand</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Forest restoration programs require production of high quality planting stock of a wide range of indigenous forest tree species. Because many of these species have proved difficult to propagate from seed it is important to develop methods to produce planting stock by other means. The method examined in this study was vegetative propagation of cuttings. The objectives of the research were i) to develop and test cutting propagation techniques for tree species which are rare or threatened with extirpation from northern Thailand and which have been difficult to grown from seed and ii) to test the effects of different rooting hormone treatments on cutting performance, in terms of survival, vigour and rooting. Four rare tree species, Haldina cordifolia(Roxb.) Rids., Ilex umbellulata(Wall.) Loesn., Rothmania sootepensis(Craib) Brem., and Shoutenia glomerataKing ssp. peregrine(Craib) Roekm. & Hart. were investigated for their suitability for vegetative propagation. All cuttings were treated with various rooting hormones and placed in the same rooting media and propagator with approximately 30% sunlight. Only 9% of Shoutenia glomerataproduced roots. This species rooted most efficiently without any hormone treatment and produced the highest relative performance scores. Application of auxin did not enhance rooting in the other three tested species. Rooting in these species was difficult to achieve and, therefore, it is not possible to mass-produce quality planting stock in simple non-mist propagators. Further work is required to achieve good rooting rapidly by testing other propagation methods or other hormone treatments for species conservation and for forest restoration in northern Thailand.]]></abstract>
	<region>Thailand</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ratnamhin A, Elliott S and Wangpakapattanawong P. Cutting Propagation of Rare Tree Species for Forest Restoration in Northern Thailand. : Science Forum 2010Thailand. : World Agroforestry Centre  (ICRAF) Thailand. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2478</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>270</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0270-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Conflict, Cooperation and Collective Action Land use, water rights and water scarcity in Manupali watershed, Southern Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Caroline Duque-Piñon, Delia Catacutan, Beria Leimona, Emma Abasolo, Meine van Noordwijk and Lydia Tiongco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Water is essential to human survival. It is also indispensable to livelihoods and most forms of economic production. However, access, allocation and use of water can create conflict. While conflicts at the national and international levels vary from policies affecting water management to transboundary issues, water access dominates conflicts at the local level, which are often direct and can spill over into wider-scale violence. In many cases, political, socio-economic and cultural factors determine the complexity of these water conflicts. Resolving water conflict can be complicated and take a lot of time. Hence, some water users opt for simple compromises to settle disputes between them through collective action and cooperative agreements.</abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Duque-Piñon C, Catacutan D, Leimona B, Abasolo E, van Noordwijk M and Tiongco L. Conflict, Cooperation and Collective Action Land use, water rights and water scarcity in Manupali watershed, Southern Philippines. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2477</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>269</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0269-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Ecosystem-based mitigation and adaptation (EBMA): exploring the synergies in agroforestry</maintitle>
	<author>Rodel D. Lasco and Rafaela Jane Delfino</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[As the impacts of climate change are felt and expected to further stress human and natural ecosystems, it is vital that essential ecosystem services are maintained in order to protect human wellbeing.<br/><br/> The rural poor in developing countries are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Ecosystem services help improves human wellbeing and may enhance resilience and reduce risk for local communities.<br/><br/> Ecosystems provide a venue where the synergies between adaptation and mitigation can be optimized and trade-offs reduced.<br/><br/> There are two options to address climate change:<br/>(1) Mitigation<br/>(2) Adaptation<br/><br/> Historically, both has been treated separately due to its differences in spatial, temporal and sectoral scales. However, there has been recent focus in research and policy on synergies between adaptation and mitigation that will provide for win-win solutions. However, there is still the need to look more into the synergies and conflicts at different scales.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lasco RD and Delfino RJ. Ecosystem-based mitigation and adaptation (EBMA): exploring the synergies in agroforestry. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2476</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>268</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0268-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Rewards for environmental services and benefits to the poorLessons from Asia</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Emerging approaches to payment for environmental services (PES) mostly only focus on the efficiency in providing the services. Nevertheless, neglect of the perspectives of all actors in the landscape and their livelihood strategies can jeopardize the success of PES and contradict the global mandate.<br/><br/> Rewards for environmental services (RES) link global priorities on poverty reduction and environmental sustainability and are designed to balance effectiveness and efficiency with fairness and pro-poor characteristics.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B and van Noordwijk M. Rewards for environmental services and benefits to the poorLessons from Asia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2475</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>267</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0267-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Are conditional and realistic REDD + mechanism feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: II. Option for setting up reference emission level for REDD+ within REALU in Berau, East Kalimantan</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>In respond to the opportunity of developing REDD pilot areas in Indonesia, the district government of Berau has formed a task-force to discuss the potentiality of district-level
involvement in developing pilot areas. Our previous study showed that the overall annual emission of Berau in 1990-2008 is 9.2Mg CO -eq/Ha.Year, 2 with more than 50% emission came from forest zone. The remaining question is how to set up a reference emission level for Berau under the lack of policy and guidelines for national and local government.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S and Ekadinata A. Are conditional and realistic REDD + mechanism feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: II. Option for setting up reference emission level for REDD+ within REALU in Berau, East Kalimantan. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2474</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>266</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0266-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Dynamics and Trajectories of Rubber Agroforestin BungoDistrict, Jambi: Assessment for the Potentials of Eco-certification</maintitle>
	<author>M. Thoha Zulkarnain, Andree Ekadinata and Atiek Widayati</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>The high pressure of land use change that has occurred in Sumatera, Indonesia, reduces forest cover. However, various land uses that replace forest are considered to be able to preserve some of forest ecological functions. Rubber agroforest, a traditional extensive rubber cultivation system,has the capacity to support species diversity in an impoverished landscape currently dominated by monoculture plantation (Figure 1).Currently, ICRAF conducts a study to observe the dynamics and trajectories of rubber agroforestin BungoDistrict, Jambi over time and space using remote sensing data and spatial analysis. The outputs are expected to contribute to the discussions towards rubber eco-certification in Jambi Province.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Zulkarnain MT, Ekadinata A and Widayati A. Dynamics and Trajectories of Rubber Agroforestin BungoDistrict, Jambi: Assessment for the Potentials of Eco-certification. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2473</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>265</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0265-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Are conditional and realistic REDD + mechanism feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: I. Estimation of land use, land use change and forestry carbon emission of Berau District, East Kalimantan</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Zuraidah Said and Sonya Dewi</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>From UNFCCC COP-13 meeting in Bali in 2007, countries agreed that there was an urgent need to take further meaningful action to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. The demonstration activities of REDD (Reduction Emission from Deforestation and Degradation) is being implemented by many tropical countries worldwide. Measurement/ monitoring, Reporting and Verification are the integral part of implementing REDD. Historical emissions are needed to assess the additional of REDD implementation as well as in setting up Reference Emission Level or Reference Level. Prior to any REDD implementation, estimates of historical emissions are useful to assess whether a REDD project or program is feasible or not.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Said Z and Dewi S. Are conditional and realistic REDD + mechanism feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: I. Estimation of land use, land use change and forestry carbon emission of Berau District, East Kalimantan. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2472</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>264</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0264-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Landscape dynamics over time and space from ecological perspective</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Sonya Dewi and Jean-Laurent Pfund</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Methodological approaches to biodiversity studies in a multifunctional landscape need to consider the dynamics of land cover and land uses over space in order to capture
ecological process, such as habitat fragmentation and matrix effects. Remote sensing and GIS toolsis instrumental in capturing the complex dynamics of tropical landscapes and in communicating the results to decision-makers. Further, spatial analysis can deriveindices to quantify patterns of composition and configuration of patches in a landscape. This study will address landscape dynamics over time and space with explicit
links to the interface between livelihood and biodiversity in 5 study areas of the project: Indonesia (Bungo), Laos (Viengkham), Madagascar (Manompana), Cameroon (Takamanda Mone) and Tanzania (East Usambara).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Dewi S and Pfund J. Landscape dynamics over time and space from ecological perspective. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2471</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>263</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0263-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Spatial analysis as a basis for enhancing environmental service and sustainable development</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi, Andree Ekadinata, Feri Johana and Atiek Widayati</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[A landscape is a large enough contiguous area which is dynamics in space (x, y, z) and in
time (t). Landscape as a unit analysis is defined not independently from the objectives of a study. In assessing a landscape, one needs to cover the continuity over the landscape to understand the landscape configuration and landscape transformation processes. Four main functionalities of SALA are to assess and quantify: (A) the flow
and relationships among elements of the landscape represent landscape transformation processes, (B) the landscape spatial dynamics, i.e., the variation, pattern and composition within the landscape, (C) the landscape temporal dynamics, i.e., the changes in the landscape from time to time, and (D) the spatial autocorrelation (i.e., correlation between nearby areas) due to spatially auto-correlated processes and
characteristics.<br/><br/> Remotely sensed data are used to evaluate land cover
based on the appearance of land surface in one particular time. Specifically designed sensors can generate data that are used to derive elevation maps, hot spots, wind direction etc. The scope of SALA embraces land use/cover change and trajectories
(ALUCT) and spatial planning for sustainable development (I3SPA). Basically for the environmental services for sustainable development application, remotely sensed data are the sources of time-series land cover maps, of which environmental services in the forms of watershed protection, biodiversity maintenance and climate change mitigation are strongly related with. A set of base maps that is aligned with the remotely sensed
data is necessary as additional data to interpret the remotely sensed data, to quantify temporal changes in the same location, and to combine the land cover maps with other factors to quantify and qualify environmental services and livelihood provision. For more specific application, further modeling and analysis are often necessary. SALA produces the main data input for other TULSEA series, i.e., RaBA, RaTA, RaCSA, RHA,
DriLUC.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Johana F and Widayati A. Spatial analysis as a basis for enhancing environmental service and sustainable development. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2470</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>262</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0262-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Land use change and forest degradation in Sumatran orangutan habitats and the opportunity cost of CO2 emissions</maintitle>
	<author>Atiek Widayati, Andree Ekadinata and Made Hesti Lestari Tata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>CO2emissionsLandscape arrangements for biodiversity preservation and human livelihood recognise?segregate? and ?integrate? approaches. Segregation approach has issues of boundaries that in many cases are contested among stakeholders.The more integrated and gradual transition from natural forest to human habitat has survived through the maintenance of the ecosystem services, like regularity of water flow and other services that the forest provides. Such bundled services may strengthen the arguments to conserve forest flora and fauna habitats, but yet remain unassessed.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Widayati A, Ekadinata A and Tata MH. Land use change and forest degradation in Sumatran orangutan habitats and the opportunity cost of CO2 emissions. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2469</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>261</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0261-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Understanding local perception on low carbon development: the case of Gorontalo and Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Jusupta Tarigan, Andree Ekadinata, Atiek Widayati and S. Suyanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>The Indonesia government has targeted to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation around 26%; The implementation should be rational and reasonable because it can interfere with national development plans, particularly in sub national level. Preparation of a national strategy to reduce emissions at the national level will also affect the sub-national. That requires an analysis of land use and land cover change
that incorporated with many aspects. Through Accountability and Local Level Initiatives to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Indonesia(ALLREDDI)
project we try to assist local government in 5 provinces of Indonesia to account for their reference emission level. This is an ongoing activities. In this poster we are going to describe some of the result in Gorontalo and South Kalimantan</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Tarigan J, Ekadinata A, Widayati A and Suyanto S. Understanding local perception on low carbon development: the case of Gorontalo and Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2468</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>260</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0260-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Biodiversity and climate change in dynamic landscapes of Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Indonesia had been identified as the third largest GHG emitter world-wide. More than 50% of the emission was rooted from LULUCF, and a large part of it was related with peat burning, draining and conversion. As the second biodiversity rich country with largest tropical peat land in the world, but at the same time experiencing unprecedented forest extraction and forest conversion, Indonesia has a very important role in delivering some ecosystem services to the global community. Forest extraction and conversion are integral parts of land transformation that is often complex and non-linear, and more over, very variable across Indonesia. At the national level, landscape transformation is driven by international market, global/regional climate, such as El
Nino that leads to forest fire, and is an aggregated manifestation of local drivers and activities. Integrated assessment of the impacts of LULUCF on emissions and habitat fragmentation within several global priority ecoregion in Indonesia is necessary to find spaces for harmonizing efforts on climate change mitigation, biodiversity maintenance and sustainable development.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S and Ekadinata A. Biodiversity and climate change in dynamic landscapes of Indonesia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2467</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>259</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0259-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Nation-wide analysis of Indonesia land cover change and above ground carbon stock dynamics</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Sonya Dewi and Saipul Rahman</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Indonesia has been the center of attention in the current debate of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and degradation .Over the past decade it is regarded as the country with the third country of highest emissions although there is
considerable debate and uncertainty over the figures. Recently, Indonesia has been taking an active role in the discussion on fair and efficient mechanisms and economic incentives to reduce emissions. Unfortunately, credible carbon accounting system
that should serve as the basis carbon incentives negotiation is still not available. More over, data to calculate historic emission as a basis for reference emission level setting are known to have high uncertainty. Through ALREDDI (Accountability and Local Level Initiative to Reduce Emission from Deforestation and Degradation in Indonesia) project
funded by European Union (EU), we assist Indonesian government in accounting for land-use based greenhouse gas emissions.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, Dewi S and Rahman S. Nation-wide analysis of Indonesia land cover change and above ground carbon stock dynamics. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2466</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>258</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0258-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Is Understory Vegetable Production in Smallholder Agroforestry Systems a Viable Option?</maintitle>
	<author>Gerhard Manurung, James M Roshetko, Anas Susila, Denta Anggakusuma and Arif Rahmanulloh</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Farmers in Nanggung, West Java traditionally cultivate vegetables under full sunlight.
Few farmers (11%) have experience with intercropping vegetables and tree crops. An
on-farm trial was implemented to evaluate the production of seven commercial
vegetable species under three light levels as the treatment in a nested design.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Gerhard Manurung G, Roshetko JM, Susila A, Anggakusuma D and Rahmanulloh A. Is Understory Vegetable Production in Smallholder Agroforestry Systems a Viable Option?. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2465</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>257</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0257-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Smallholder Vegetable Cultivation: Challenges in Sustaining Commercial Production and Market Links</maintitle>
	<author>James M Roshetko, Iwan Kurniawan and Suseno Budidarsono</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>This poster reports on how smallholder farmers can establish commercially oriented systems and maintain market links. Smallholder vegetable producers in Nanggung sub-district face some major uncertainties which impose difficult planning horizons. Product prices often vary day to day, seasonally and year to year; yields vary from season to season; planting and harvesting times may vary considerably due to inconsistent weather patterns. Price uncertainty is a result of the biological lag time between planning, production, harvestand sale. In many cases, vegetables are ready to harvest but the crop does not meet market specifications or insects and disease cause significant damage and loss of marketability. The World Agroforestry Centre and Winrock International conducted action research in Nanggungsub-district, Bogor district, West Java, to reach motivated and innovative farmers who were committed to improving their incomes by increasing the production and market access of their agroforestry products, specifically commodities produced in vegetable agroforestry systems (VAFs). Activities were conducted as part of the Agroforestry and Sustainable Vegetable Production in Southeast Asian Watershedsproject supported by the USAID-funded Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM-CRSP.)</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Roshetko JM, Kurniawan I and Budidarsono S. Smallholder Vegetable Cultivation: Challenges in Sustaining Commercial Production and Market Links. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 3</grp>
	<publicationid>2464</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>256</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0256-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Forest Carbon Project in Quirino Province, Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor, Luzon, Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Rodel D. Lasco, John Acay Jr, Estrella Passion and Yoji Natori</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Conservation International (CI) launched a carbon sequestration and monitoring program that provides investment opportunities for sustainable protection of the central Sierra Madre area, particularly along the Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor (SMBC).<br/>The Sierra Madre, home to nearly half the country's forest is essential
habitat for threatened species.<br/>The SMBC encompasses 1.4 million hectares of land, where the country?s remaining old-growth forests can be found. It is the longest
mountain range in the country, measuring about 500 kilometers long. It is an important habitat to more than 400 species of wildlife, which 153 species are only found in the country. It also serves as a watershed for the region, supplying water for hydroelectric generation and household and agricultural use.<br/> CI-Philippines Forest Carbon Project in Sierra Madre is being established at 2 locations- within Quirino Protected Landscape (QPL) at Quirino province and within Peablanca Protected Landscape and
Seascape (PPLS) at Cagayan province. These two locations form part of the Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor (SMBC).<br/>In Qurino province, CI worked with local and national governments in collaboration with communities and the private sector, to establish the 175,000 hectare-Quirino Protected Landscape.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Lasco RD, Acay Jr J, Passion E and Natori Y. Forest Carbon Project in Quirino Province, Sierra Madre Biodiversity Corridor, Luzon, Philippines. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2463</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>255</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0255-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The Ikalahan Ancestral Domain Proposed Forest Carbon Development</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Emma Abasolo, Grace B.Villamor and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The Ikalahan, which literally means people of the mossy upland forests or people of the broadleaf forest is the tribal name of the indigenous people behind the proposed forest carbon development. For centuries, the Ikalahan lived in the area where hunting, gathering of forest products and swidden farming were their means of survival,
planting crops like sweet potato, ginger, gabi, cassava and other vegetables and terracing to plant upland rice.<br/> They were considered squatters until they organized and gained tenure over the lands through a Memorandum of Agreement between the Kalahan Education Foundation (KEF) representing the Ikalahan and the
government through the-then Bureau of Forest Development. Nearly 15 000 ha of the Ancestral Domain Claim was designated as the Kalahan Reserve. The Certificate of Ancestral Domain Claim (CADC) was issued in 1999, and the Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) was issued in 2005.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Abasolo E, Villamor GB and Lasco RD. The Ikalahan Ancestral Domain Proposed Forest Carbon Development. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2462</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>254</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0254-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Proposed Forest Carbon Development Project at Arakan Forest Corridor</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Jayson C. Ibañez and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Arakan is composed of 28 municipalities populated by ethno-linguistic groups, predominantly of the Manobo-Kulamanon and Manobo-Tinananon tribes. The Manobo tribes are considered the original settlers. Total land area is 69 432.79 ha. Classified
agricultural land comprises about 14%, however, about 24% is used for crops,
while forest is only 4%.<br/><br/>After commercial logging (1960s-1980s) and agriculture encroaching the logged-over areas, only isolated fragments of forest cover remain in the mountain ranges of Sinaka, Mahuson and Kabalantiian-Binoongan-Kulaman (KABIKU), which are home to important wildlife species such as the IUCN
?critically endangered? Philippine eagle and the ?vulnerable? Philippine hawk eagle Spizaetus philippensis.<br/><br/> Though relatively small, Sinaka is regarded as one of the world?s important bird areas because of the relatively high proportion of unique and threatened species it contains. Mahuson has also a unique mammalian population,
exemplified by a new species of fruit bat, the Philippine large-headed fruit bat. Since at least 1992, two wild pairs of Philippine eagles have been breeding on mounts Sinaka and in Mahuson. In 1993, the Philippine eagle ?Kahayag? was retrieved from an old nest tree at the KABIKU forest.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Ibañez JC and Lasco RD. Proposed Forest Carbon Development Project at Arakan Forest Corridor. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2461</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>253</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0253-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Mount Kitanglad Range Proposed Forest Carbon Development</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Felix S Mirasol Jr., Benedicto Golosino and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Mount Kitanglad Range (MKR) is located in the north-central portion of Bukidnon, Mindanao, Philippines.<br/> MKR has unique ecological features, such as connected landscapes and an immense natural diversity of flora and fauna, combined with a
unique interplay of cultural communities that contributes significantly to the national economy and heritage. However, the ecologically important features are threatened.<br/> To provide legal basis for pursuing actions for conservation and
protection, the MKR area was proclaimed a national park by Presidential Proclamation No. 667 on December 14, 1990. It was reclassified as a natural park by Presidential Proclamation No. 896 in 1996. It became a fully fledged protected area as Mount Kitanglad Range Natural Park through the Republic Act 8978, known as the Mount Kitanglad Act of 2000.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Mirasol Jr. FS, Golosino B and Lasco RD. Mount Kitanglad Range Proposed Forest Carbon Development. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2460</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>252</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0252-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Smallholders Forest Carbon Development in the Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Raquel C. Lopez, Paul L.G. Vlek, Dennis P Garrity and Rodel D. Lasco</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Los Banos, Philippines</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Forest carbon development by ?agroforestation? is one of the ways by which optimal economic and environmental services can be achieved. This can be accomplished by promoting a purely forest-tree system and/or agroforestry tree system, or the integration of ?working trees? in agricultural cultivated landscapes.<br/><br/> The challenge of forest carbon development on denuded ?forest frontiers? is the re- egetation of the area purely with indigenous, native/endemic tree species applying the ?rainforestation strategy, especially in biodiversity hotspots and critical watershed areas. The agroforestry system strategy is most likely the option to be adopted in the ?forest-agricultural mosaic? and ?agricultural lowlands?.]]></abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Lopez RC, Vlek PL, Garrity DP and Lasco RD. Smallholders Forest Carbon Development in the Philippines. : Science Forum 2010Los Banos, Philippines. : World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Philippines. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2459</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>251</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0251-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Consumer Preference for Indigenous Vegetables</maintitle>
	<author>Lia Dahlia, Iwan Kurniawan, Denta Anggakusuma and James M Roshetko</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>In the past, Indonesian agriculture has provided an important contribution to local livelihoods and the national economy, accounting for 13.8% of gross national product (BPS, 2008). It is estimated that there are 24 million ha of underutilized dryagricultural land in Indonesia. Poor households living in those areas have a high level of dependency on agriculture because thenon-agricultural economy is not well developed. It is crucial that the government implement policies that stimulate and diversify smallholder agricultural, horticultural and livestock sectors, including the rehabilitation of private land with high-value timber and fruit tree species. If supported, smallholder sectors can contribute to reducing rural poverty and strengthening the national economy. A research study was conducted in and around Bogor, West Java, to document consumer knowledge, preferences and consumption behavior in relation to four indigenous vegetables?katuk, kucai, honjeand tebu telor?and inform stakeholders of opportunities for commercialization.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dahlia L, Kurniawan I, Anggakusuma D and Roshetko JM. Consumer Preference for Indigenous Vegetables. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 3</grp>
	<publicationid>2458</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>250</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0250-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in AsiaPayments, Compensation, or Co-Investment?</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk and Beria Leimona</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>The term ?Payments for Environmental Services? (PES) has rapidly gained popularity, with its focus on market-based mechanisms for enhancing environmental services (ES). Current use of the term, however, covers a broad spectrum of interactions between ES suppliers and beneficiaries. A broader class of mechanisms pursues ES enhancement through compensation or rewards (Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services (CRES)). Such mechanisms can be analyzed on the basis of how they meet four conditions: Realistic, Conditional, Voluntary and Pro-poor.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M and Leimona B. Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in AsiaPayments, Compensation, or Co-Investment?. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2457</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>249</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0249-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Gender Equality in Rewards for Environmental Services Schemes in Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Beria Leimona and Siti Amanah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>A rewards for environmental services scheme is a mechanism to connect between environmental service providers and their beneficiaries through the flow of environmental services and rewards. Trust and strong social capital are needed to ensure success , but need nurturing and maintenance by stakeholders involved. Gender equality between community members?both for males and females?is a pre-requisite and further guarantees solid social interaction.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Leimona B and Amanah S. Gender Equality in Rewards for Environmental Services Schemes in Indonesia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2456</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>248</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0248-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>RaTA: Identifying the Nature of Land Tenure Conflicts</maintitle>
	<author>Gamma Galudra and Ujjwal P. Pradhan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[RaTA stands for Rapid Land Tenure Assessment.<br/>It explores competing claims among different actors who hold different rights and powers because the claims are often related to changing land tenure policies developed in different historical periods and for varying purposes.<br/>By analyzing the roles of policies in land conflicts and competing claims, RaTA can offer policy options and interventions as alternative means to settle land conflicts.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Galudra G and Pradhan UP. RaTA: Identifying the Nature of Land Tenure Conflicts. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2455</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>247</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0247-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Are conditional and realistic REDD+ mechanisms feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: II. Profitability Analysis of Land Use Systems at District Level in REDD+ Feasibility</maintitle>
	<author>Arif Rahmanulloh, Suseno Budidarsono and Muhammad Sofiyuddin</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Profitability analysis is one out of three components used to estimate opportunity cost of REDD+ at district level of Berau. Two other components are carbon stock accounting/monitoring and driver analysis of land use/cover change. To upscale in landscape level, spatial analysis derived land use cover change during the period of study (1990-2005).<br/><br/> To quantify economic return of each main land use systems in Berau district, it provides clear comparison of benefit accepted by the
people, operators or other parties affected by designed land-use change intervention (REDD+)]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Rahmanulloh A, Budidarsono S and Sofiyuddin M. Are conditional and realistic REDD+ mechanisms feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: II. Profitability Analysis of Land Use Systems at District Level in REDD+ Feasibility. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2454</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>246</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0246-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Are conditional and realistic REDD+ mechanisms feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: III. Opportunity Cost Analysis Of REDD+ at The District Level</maintitle>
	<author>Arif Rahmanulloh, Sonya Dewi, Suseno Budidarsono and Zuraidah Said</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Opportunities to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation are substantial if effective and efficient mechanisms can be established to offset real and legitimate opportunity costs<br/><br/>A pilot area for REDD implementation can help address the last issue and is very attractive, not only for gaining in-situ project experience,
but also for the potential lessons learned and resultant multiplier effects<br/><br/> The scoping study for REDD pilot area should test the feasibility of REDD from all three criteria: conditionality, realistic and voluntary criteria]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Rahmanulloh A, Dewi S, Budidarsono S and Said Z. Are conditional and realistic REDD+ mechanisms feasible? A case of a rich forested district in Indonesia: III. Opportunity Cost Analysis Of REDD+ at The District Level. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2453</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>245</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0245-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Is it Feasible?REDD/REALU Site-level Feasibility Appraisal (RESFA) in Lamandauwildlife reserve, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Janudianto, Laxman Joshi, Elok Mulyoutami, Muhammad Sofiyuddin, Suseno Budidarsono, Gamma Galudra, Sonya Dewi, Andree Ekadinata, M. Thoha Zulkarnain, Subekti Rahayu, Rachmat Mulia, Ni'matul Khasanah and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[While the international rules and (financial) incentives for REDD+ (reducing emission from deforestation and degradation plus) at a national scale are still being negotiated, a large number of sub-national and site-specific demonstration projects have been designed and many more are planned.<br/><br/>The LamandauRiver Wildlife Reserve (LRWR or ?the reserve?) forest conservation and community development project is one of a portfolio of four REDD+ projects being supported by the Clinton Climate Initiative?Forestry program, ?Addressing the challenges of scaling-pp REDD+ activities in Indonesia?.<br/><br/>REDD/REALU Site-level Feasibility Appraisal (RESFA) were used as the framework for studying the key livelihoods, land-use change, carbon stock and tenure issues to develop prospective scenarios and impact predictions for the eastern buffer area of the reserve (23600ha).]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Janudianto, Joshi L, Mulyoutami E, Sofiyuddin M, Budidarsono S, Galudra G, Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Zulkarnain MT, Rahayu S, Mulia R, Khasanah N and van Noordwijk M. Is it Feasible?REDD/REALU Site-level Feasibility Appraisal (RESFA) in Lamandauwildlife reserve, Indonesia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2452</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>244</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0244-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Benzoin gardens in the forest edge of North Sumatera</maintitle>
	<author>Yuliana Wulan, Elok Mulyoutami and Endri Martini</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>AssessmentBenzoinresin (?Kemenyan? in BahasaIndonesia) which mainly produced from Sumatra benzoin(Styraxsumatrana) are very important for people who live in and near forests in BatangToru. It provides cash income for many farmers in the region. The harvesting of the product requires relatively small or no capital which is why many poor people engage in these activities. It also involves low impact on environment. Benzoinresin was mainly exported to Middle East countries as preservative ingredient and as incense for cosmetics, perfumes, cigarettes purposes. The benzointrees have been culturally important and being used to indicate the ownership of the land. Historically, many benzoinin North Sumatera regions were planted in early Indonesian Independence period (around 1945) to secure forest lands. Nowadays they are mostly abandoned since the price of the resin continue to decline. Some of the gardens revert back to forest and some others converted into rubber or coffee cultivation. Nevertheless, benzoinresin are still important products in North Sumatra and nearly 65% poor farmers in the regions relying on this commodity.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Wulan Y, Mulyoutami E and Martini E. Benzoin gardens in the forest edge of North Sumatera. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2451</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>243</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0243-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Gender and Income Equity in Social Forestry Programs</maintitle>
	<author>Noviana Khususiyah, R. Yana Buana and S. Suyanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Java is only 6% of the total area of Indonesia but it is inhabited by 70% of the 230+ million Indonesians. More than 60% of the rural communities in Java depend on agricultural activities as their main source of income. Most of the rural communities are poor and live on the forest margins with an average land holding of less than 0.5 ha per household. This situation has hampered socio-economic development of the forest margins.<br/><br/>Available land for agriculture in Java is limited. More than 50% of its forest is managed by PerumPerhutani(State Forest Company). Farmers have limited access to this land. Nevertheless, due to economic pressure and lack of governance during the krismon(monetary crisis) period, farmers? communities around state forest land opened up the areas. This led to conflict between Perum Perhutaniand farmers? communities in many parts of Java.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Khususiyah N, Buana RY and Suyanto S. Gender and Income Equity in Social Forestry Programs. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2450</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>242</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0242-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Fair and efficient? How stakeholders view investments to avoid deforestation in Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>S. Suyanto and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>?Fair and efficient REDD value chain allocation??(FERVA) is an experimental method to negotiate balance between fairness and efficiency across scales. Simultaneously achieving the twin goals of (1) fair and sustainable development and (2) efficient emission reduction is a matter of managing trade-offs.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Suyanto S and van Noordwijk M. Fair and efficient? How stakeholders view investments to avoid deforestation in Indonesia. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2449</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>241</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0241-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Watersheds degrade and this makes river flow less predictable: bigger floods and lower dry season flow ? but how to quantify? A parsimonious null model of flow persistence (FlowPer) links local knowledge to hard data</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Lisa Tanika, Tonni Asmawan and Ni'matul Khasanah</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Landscapes translate a temporal pattern of rainfall into a temporal pattern of stream flow, which aggregates up to a river. Downstream stakeholders start from what they want to see (?perfectly regular flow of clean water?) and observe a pattern of stream and river flow that doesn?t match their expectations. They search for interventions
on the ?anthropogenic? groups of causes (?deforestation?, ?degradation?), but need to understand the potential reach of such interventions, given the geological and climatic background. In the absence of knowledge of what happens upstream, an observer of
river flow can deduce a fair amount of information from a time series of river flow data.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Tanika L, Asmawan T and Khasanah N. Watersheds degrade and this makes river flow less predictable: bigger floods and lower dry season flow – but how to quantify? A parsimonious null model of flow persistence (FlowPer) links local knowledge to hard data. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2448</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>240</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0240-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Land Use Change and Local Communities Perception on Biodiversity</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu, Harti Ningsih, Sonya Dewi and Feri Johana</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract>Variety of animals and plants that called BIODIVERSITY, play important role in ecosystem function and livelihood sustainability. Biodiversity become source of basic material for food, health, construction (light and heavy), fuel and fiber. Biodiversity product like timber, resin, fruits and honey become important source of income to community as timber and non timber forest product (NTFP). On the other hand, biodiversity has ecosystem services such as genetic resources, spiritual and religious value, aesthetic value, provision of habitat, nutrient cycling, water cycling, climate regulation, pollinators, seed dispersal, and any other services. Rapid and unprecedented land use changes have reduced significantly local and global biodiversity measures such as species number, relative abundance and compositions.Some indigenous species lost due to land use change and some introduced species replace it. Changing biodiversity affects ecosystem function and
livelihood sustainability at the same time. While the effect on ecosystem function is mostly one way, the effect on livelihoods are confounding to the facts thatland use
changes are driven and have consequences on livelihoods. Economic reason, of course, is main factor of land use change. Economic orientation of community is strongly influenced by infrastructure development condition in certain area, for example access to market. Forum group discussion in three different road access of villages conducted in Bungo District, Jambi, Sumatra to know: local perception of biodiversity function and in what land cover biodiversity and it function still found.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Rahayu S, Ningsih H, Dewi S and Johana F. Land Use Change and Local Communities Perception on Biodiversity. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2447</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>239</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0239-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon and Watershed Functions as Conditionality for Community Forest</maintitle>
	<author>Noviana Khususiyah, Subekti Rahayu, R. Yana Buana, Tonni Asmawan and S. Suyanto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[? The World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) collaborates with KONSEPSI to conduct research on the biophysics and socioeconomics of the buffer area of Sesaot protected forest. The research focuses on three topics: agroforestry and carbon sequestration; assessment of watershed conditions and; livelihoods.<br/>? The protected area in Sesaot, West Lombok, NTB, is managed by the local community as an important source of livelihoods and has potential for greater poverty alleviation. About 5950.18 ha of forest area, located in the upper part of Jangkok and Dodokan watershed, plays an important role in the supply of water to the city of Mataram and West and Central Lombok districts.<br/>? Community forest (HKm) is forest management by local
communities based on the forestry minister ?s regulation No. P37/ Menhut-II/2007. Sesaot is a reserved area with an area of 185 hectares and is part of a regional HKm program based on ministerial decree No. 445/Menhut-II/2009, August 4.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Khususiyah N, Rahayu S, Buana RY, Asmawan T and Suyanto S. Carbon and Watershed Functions as Conditionality for Community Forest. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2446</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>238</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0238-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Exploration of tree management options to manipulate tree and crop interaction trade-off using WaNuLCAS model</maintitle>
	<author>Ni'matul Khasanah, Betha Lusiana, Didik Suprayogo, Meine van Noordwijk and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The transformation from degraded soils to agroforestry can benefit from the complementarities between the early stages of tree-based production systems and crop growth.<br/><br/>Farmers managing such transitions must make strategic decisions (multi-year) on the choice of tree species, the number of trees per hectare and spacing; and tactical decisions (shorter term) on the choice of intercrops, tree canopy pruning and/or treeroot pruning.<br/><br/>We used a simulation model to explore these choices: the Water, Nutrient and Light Capture in Agroforestry Systems (WaNuLCAS ) model (van Noordwijk and Lusiana 1999; van Noordwijk et al 2004). The study was conducted in Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Khasanah N, Lusiana B, Suprayogo D, van Noordwijk M and Cadisch G. Exploration of tree management options to manipulate tree and crop interaction trade-off using WaNuLCAS model. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2445</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>237</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0237-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon footprint of Indonesian palm oil production: II. Study design and methodology</maintitle>
	<author>Suseno Budidarsono, Andree Ekadinata, Ni'matul Khasanah, Subekti Rahayu and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Oil palm?one of the most productive tree crops of the world, at the basis of many food products, and also a potential biofuel, potentially replacing fossil fuel diesel. Following to the completed pilot study (Dewi et al., 2009), second phase of the study has been conducted throughout Indonesia, with the following key questions:<br/>? Does current Indonesian palm oil production, on average, meet the standards for net emission reduction when used as biofuel?<br/>? How can a palm oil production that meets the standards be identified and recognized?<br/>? How can oil palm production affected
the livelihood of people in its vicinity?]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Budidarsono S, Ekadinata A, Khasanah N, Rahayu S and van Noordwijk M. Carbon footprint of Indonesian palm oil production: II. Study design and methodology. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2444</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>236</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0236-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon Footprint of Indonesian Palm Oil Production: I. a Pilot Study</maintitle>
	<author>Sonya Dewi, Ni'matul Khasanah, Subekti Rahayu, Andree Ekadinata and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[In the last five years Indonesian palm oil production grew by 13.41% per year, with growth in export at 16.24% per year and slow growth in domestic consumption. Oil palm production in Indonesia and Malaysia is now in the focus of the debates on Biofuel and Carbondioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, through its association in the public debate with deforestation and (over)use of peatland. The potential use of palm oil as biodiesel to reduce dependency on, and emissions from, the use of fossil fuel has focused debate on the emissions caused by the conversion of land to oil palm and subsequent steps in the production.<br/><br/>Carbondioxide (CO2) and other GHG emissions can be attributed to three phases of the production process:<br/>a. the initial conversion of preceding vegetation, usually based on 'land clearing', leading to a 'C debt?,<br/>b. the balance of emission and absorption during the growth cycle of the oil palms, leading to a time-averaged C-stock that influences 'C debt' and repay time,<br/>c. transport to the refinery followed by CPO and kernel production, transesterification into biofuel and further transport to the end users.<br/><br/>A comprehensive accounting system on carbon and other GHG emissions of biofuel production of oil palm has to include the whole life cycle assessment (LCA) through a life cycle inventory (LCI) (ISO, 1997).]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Dewi S, Khasanah N, Rahayu S, Ekadinata A and van Noordwijk M. Carbon Footprint of Indonesian Palm Oil Production: I. a Pilot Study. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2443</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>235</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0235-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Exploration of Landscape Dynamics in the Buffer Area of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve and its neighboring area, Central Kalimantan, using the FALLOW model</maintitle>
	<author>Rachmat Mulia, Ni'matul Khasanah, Meine van Noordwijk, Andree Ekadinata and M. Thoha Zulkarnain</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The buffer area (23 600 ha) to the east of the Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve (LRWR) in Kota Waringin Lama subdistrict, Central Kalimantan, is a logged-over production forest that was earmarked for conversion to non-forest use but is now a candidate target for forest landscape restoration as part of early action on REDD+.<br/><br/>As part of a feasibility study, the FALLOW (Forest, Agroforest, Lowvalue Land Or Waste?) modelling method developed by Van Noordwijk (2002) and Suyamto and others (2009) was used for exploring future landscape mosaics and the consequences of such for the economic and ecological performance not only of the buffer area but also for the LRWR and the two sub-districts of Arut Selatan and Kota Waringin Lama. The wider area study can help us understand the issues of leakage and additionality in relating human
use of the landscape to carbon-stock changes.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mulia R, Khasanah N, van Noordwijk M, Ekadinata A and Zulkarnain MT. Exploration of Landscape Dynamics in the Buffer Area of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve and its neighboring area, Central Kalimantan, using the FALLOW model. : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2442</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PO</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>234</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PO0234-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Carbon Stock Change Estimation in Buffer Area of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve using Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RACSA)</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu, Meine van Noordwijk, Laxman Joshi, Ni'matul Khasanah and Andree Ekadinata</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<descript1>Science Forum 2010</descript1>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The area between the eastern side of Lamandau river and the western side of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve (LRWR), Kota Waringin Lama, Central Kalimantan, is considered to be a ?buffer area? for the reserve. This area was classified as ?production forest? with logging rights assigned to a private forestry company and slated for ?conversion? to non-forest uses. Given this ?planned conversion? status, reassigning the area to remain under natural forest cover could qualify for support as early REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) implementation action. The logging activity ceased in 2003 and left a pretty much depleted landscape of logged-over forest. Part of the area has peat soils. Quantification of the carbon stock and recovery potential is an essential component of REDD planning for the buffer area. The LRWR is important for orangutan conservation and a buffer zone with wildlife-friendly,
human land use is desirable.<br/><br/>As part of a comprehensive REDD feasibility study, the Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RACSA) method was used to explore the impacts of land-cover change on carbonstorage and to measure the change of carbon stocks over the past 15 years. The objectives this study were to estimate (1) aboveground carbon stock at plot level in representative land-cover classes; (2) belowground carbon stock at plot level, for peat as well as mineral soils; (3) the carbon
emission and sequestration rate of the buffer area and its surrounding landscape (two sub-districts: Arut Selatan and Kota Waringin Lama); and (4) the feasible recovery rate of carbon stocks (under a REDD+ scheme that includes ?restoration?). Land-cover change was quantified using area-based change analysis and trajectory analysis methods. Information of changes was derived from land-cover maps constructed from satellite imagery from 1990, 2000 and 2005.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Rahayu S, van Noordwijk M, Joshi L, Khasanah N and Ekadinata A. Carbon Stock Change Estimation in Buffer Area of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve using Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal (RACSA). : Science Forum 2010Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2441</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>13</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0013-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Stewardship Agreements to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Ratna Akiefnawati, Grace B.Villamor, Asep Ayat, Gamma Galudra and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Policy Brief no 18</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Conflicts over who controls the forests and forest margins is now widely recognized as a key issue that needs to be addressed if the world wants to see a reduction of emissions from deforestation and degradation. Indonesia, the country with the highest carbon emissions from change in its forest cover, is now expressing global leadership in commitments to Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) that include forests, peatland and an increasing attention for the 'trees outside forest', in the form of agroforests and trees in agricultural landscapes. Agreements on stewardship in the
forest margin are key to the success of such programs, but rules need to be simplified for wider application.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Akiefnawati R, Villamor GB, Ayat A, Galudra G and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Stewardship Agreements to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. 4 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2440</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>265</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0265-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Opportunities for reducing emissions from all land uses in Indonesia: policy analysis and case studies</maintitle>
	<author>Meine van Noordwijk, Fahmuddin Agus, Sonya Dewi, Andree Ekadinata, Hesti L. Tata, S. Suyanto, Gamma Galudra and Ujjwal Pradhan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<totalpages>85</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[As a contribution to the wider debate on emission reduction from agriculture, forestry and other land uses in developing countries, this report explores the possibilities in Indonesia of broadening the current REDD+ category to include all land use and land-use changes.<br/><br/>This report provides an overview at two levels: the national debate in Indonesia and a compilation of case studies of specific landscapes where the local context shapes the debate.<br/><br/>At the case study sites there is a chance to change current land-use practices in order to establish higher carbon stock landscapes?while also providing for human livelihoods?if appropriate incentives can be derived from international co-investment and policy instruments.<br/><br/>Opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from Indonesia exist across all sectors of the economy and across a wide geographic area. However, in the international discussion so far, only two aspects have been recognised: actions in the energy and industrial sector that can obtain support from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM); and efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+). In theory, afforestation/reforestation following the Clean Development Mechanism?s afforestation/reforestation (A/R-CDM) rules can be supported, but in practice no single project in Indonesia has passed the screening filters and been submitted to the ?designated national authority? as an essential step towards international submission, review and approval.<br/><br/>All activity in enhancing tree-based carbon stocks has remained in the voluntary domain. A substantial part of Indonesia?s emissions derive from peatlands, some of which are within, and others outside of, the formal, government institutional ?forest? category and many other areas have contested status. Peatlands themselves need to be managed as hydrological entities if emissions are to be controlled and reduced.<br/><br/>Other aspects of land use on the edge of the REDD+ debate are the agroforests and tree-based landuse systems managed by farmers across Indonesia. While this vegetation usually meets international standards to be considered ?forest?, the institutional interpretation of forest in Indonesia implies loss of sovereignty for communities and farmers across the country and so they prefer naming their systems ?gardens?. The partial mismatch between the new international objective of emission reduction and the existing forest management institutions is part of the reason why efforts to ?reduce emissions from all land uses?, or REALU, is an alternative worth exploring.<br/><br/>At the national scale, three discussions have evolved, with little cross-reference so far.<br/>
1) REDD+ efforts, that received a boost in 2007 in the lead-up to the 13th Conference of Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Bali with the reports of the Indonesian Forest Climate Alliance;<br/>
2) The private sector and its trial-and-error approach to learning from emerging new standards for ?footprint? in international trade; and<br/>
3) The pioneer commitments from Indonesia in the nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMA) arena, that found at least some recognition in the otherwise disappointing outcome of the 15th COP of the UNFCCC in Copenhagen in December 2009.<br/><br/>The site-level studies reported here are of landscapes in Sumatra and Kalimantan that cross the spectrum from forest conservation through recognition of agroforest management and restocking of trees in the landscape and peatland management to conversion to oil palm production. The most positive example of the consequences of the REDD+ debate has been the recognition of village (agro)forest management in a long-term Alternatives to Slash and Burn: Partnership for the Tropical
Forest Margins (ASB) research location in Jambi, Sumatra, which will hopefully act as a beacon for many others to follow. Most of the other case studies reveal that there would indeed be opportunities to reduce emissions, while enhancing local livelihoods, but that such opportunities require new ways of thinking about, and planning of, land use.<br/><br/>The case studies also reveal an inadequacy in the currently dominant ?payment for ecosystem services?, or PES, paradigm. In the network of landscapes in Indonesia where experiments with this approach take place, water rather than carbon or biodiversity has been the primary issue, but in all cases success has depended on the building of trust?rather than clean buyer-seller financial relationships?between the external and local stakeholders.<br/><br/>A language of co-investment, sharing of risks and benefits and enhancement of reciprocity and responsibility has been the basis for success, not that of a market place. Appropriate ways for blending financial incentives with a broader approach based on ?rights? and ?recognition? are yet to evolve and gain the type of external interest that the PES paradigm has generated.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>van Noordwijk M, Agus F, Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Tata HL, Suyanto S, Galudra G and Pradhan U. Opportunities for reducing emissions from all land uses in Indonesia: policy analysis and case studies. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 2010. 85 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2439</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>BK</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>144</cnposition>
	<callnumber>BK0144-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pro-poor compensation and rewards for environmental services in the tropics: Saving the Commons in Asia, Africa and Latin America?</maintitle>
	<author>World Agroforestry Centre</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>117</totalpages>
	<abstract>Through the Millennium Development Goals world leaders promised to deal with poverty while enhancing sustainable development and international cooperation. These three goals come together in efforts to pay, compensate or reward for the environmental services that are (still) provided by upland communities. Where these services benefit downstream people that are less poor than the people in the uplands, forms of payment can be both fair and efficient. Where the services are provided as global goods, as is the case with biodiversity conservation and net reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, payments and investment can and should be made by beneficiaries overseas. The words ?Payments for Environmental Services? (PES) have become the label for a wide array of approaches and methodologies in this domain. It is a field of active research on the interface of knowledge and action. The subset of ?pro-poor? forms of such mechanisms is still under debate: is it desirable? is it even possible? should the old adage? one instrument per policy objective, one objective per policy instrument? still apply?</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>World Agroforestry Centre. 2010. Pro-poor compensation and rewards for environmental services in the tropics: Saving the Commons in Asia, Africa and Latin America?. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 117 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2438</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>12</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0012-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Community Based Forest Management (PHBM): Improving welfare and income equity for poor farmers on the forest margins</maintitle>
	<author>Noviana Khususiyah, S. Suyanto and R. Yana Buana</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 05</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[The area of Java is only 6% of the total area of Indonesia but it is inhabited by 70% of the 230 million Indonesians. More than 60% of the rural communities in Java depend on
agricultural activities as their main source of income. Most of these communities are poor and live on the margins of forests, with an average landholding of less than 0.5 ha per household, hampering socio-economic development. <br/><br/>The 1997 economic crisis almost doubled the percentage of people living in poverty in Indonesia, from 11% in 1990 to 20% in August ? September 1998. During the crisis, many migrants living in the city became unemployed owing to the collapses of many industries, forcing them to return to their original villages. <br/><br/>Available land for agriculture in Java is limited. More than 50% of its forest is managed by Perum Perhutani (state forest company) and farmers have limited access to this land. Nevertheless, owing to economic pressure and lack of governance during the crisis period, farmers' communities around state forest land cleared the forests. This led to conflict between Perum Perhutani and farmers in many parts of Java.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Khususiyah N, Suyanto S and Buana RY. 2010. Community Based Forest Management (PHBM): Improving welfare and income equity for poor farmers on the forest margins. In: Rahayu S,eds. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2437</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>11</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0011-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Community Based Forest Management (PHBM): What can we learn?</maintitle>
	<author>Noviana Khususiyah, S. Suyanto and R. Yana Buana</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<edition>Brief no. 04</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract>Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (Community-Based Forest Management) or PHBM is a joint forest management system between Perum Perhutani (the state-owned forestry management company) and a given rural community. The system is based on shared management so that forests are maintained. The 'sharing' principle includes shared responsibilities, work, inputs and benefits. The aim of the PHBM program is to integrate socioeconomic community development and forest management systems.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Khususiyah N, Suyanto S and Buana RY. 2010. Community Based Forest Management (PHBM): What can we learn?. In: Rahayu S,eds. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2436</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>389</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0389-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Diversity deficits in modelled landscape mosaics</maintitle>
	<author>Grace B.Villamor, Meine van Noordwijk, Quang Bao Le, Betha Lusiana, Robin Matthews and Paul L.G. Vlek</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Ecological Informatics</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier B.V.</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-10</mainpages>
	<abstract>We outline several diversity factors that modellers and models can include directly or indirectly in order to improve the accuracy and usefulness of the model. Without considering these factors, different types of diversity deficit can arise. These deficits can be considered in three domains: 1) in the real world where actual diversity is less than a potential state that is deemed desirable (hence we worry about loss of biodiversity and cultural diversity); 2) in modelling of the real world (where ?residual variance? may represent a diversity deficit of the model); and 3) in our recognition of the driving forces that are used to construct a model (a diversity deficit due to oversimplification). The goal of this review is to use these three domains of diversity deficit to evaluate existing models, with a longer term goal of creating a more robust
framework for assessing landscape models in the future. To that end, we evaluate the behaviour characteristics and routines of agents in some current models. We also address one of the fundamental challenges to modelling diversity, which is the integration of non-economic motivations in the decision making of human agents.</abstract>
	<keywords>Diversity deficit, Landscape mosaics, Agents' decision-making, Hybrid models, Multi-agent system models</keywords>
	<notes>doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.08.003</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Villamor GB, van Noordwijk M, Bao Le Q, Lusiana B, Matthews R and Vlek PL. 2010. Diversity deficits in modelled landscape mosaics. Ecological Informatics. : P. 1-10.</citation>
	<publicationid>2435</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>50</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0050-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Hutan Sesaot: Jasa lingkungan yang belum tersingkap</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu, Noviana Khususiyah, Tonni Asmawan and Erik Setiawan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 6</secondtitle>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>10-11</mainpages>
	<abstract>Air jernih di sepanjang Kali Sesaot merupakan satu indikator bahwa sumber air di bagian hulu masih terpelihara dengan baik. Identifikasi lapangan yang dilakukan oleh ICRAF menemukan sebanyak 56 sumber mata air yang bermuara ke Kali Sesaot, Kali
Jangkok, Kali Tembiras, Kali Pemoto, Kali Bentoyang, Kali Betung dan Kali Bensue. Mata air Ranget dimanfaatkan sebagai sumber air baku oleh PDAM untuk memenuhi sekitar 98.000 pelanggan di Kota Mataram. Air Kali Jangkok digunakan untuk irigasi sampai
ke daerah Lombok Tengah. Apa yang akan terjadi jika air dari kawasan Sesaot mengering dan menghilang?</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Rahayu S, Khususiyah N, Asmawan T and Setiawan E. "Hutan Sesaot: Jasa lingkungan yang belum tersingkap. "Kiprah Agroforestri 6. Vol.3: 10-11]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2434</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>49</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0049-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Gaharu: pohon emas yang misterius</maintitle>
	<author>Bambang Soeharto</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 6</secondtitle>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>8-9</mainpages>
	<abstract>Gaharu di alam dihasilkan dari jenis pohon tertentu yang terinfeksi oleh suatu jenis fungi atau cendawan dan hasil infeksi tersebut menghasilkan gubal yang berwarna kehitaman dan berbau wangi dengan nilai ekonomi yang sangat tinggi. Jenis pohon yang
dapat menghasilkan gubal ? gaharu adalah dari spesies Aquilaria malaccensis, Aquilaria filaria, Aquilaria beccariana, Aquilaria cumingiana, Aquilaria hirta, Aquilaria microcarpa,
Aquilaria crassna dan Gyrinops leddermannii, dengan demikian di Indonesia gaharu dikelompokkan dalam komoditas kehutanan golongan hasil hutan bukan kayu (HHBK).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Soeharto B. "Gaharu: pohon emas yang misterius. "Kiprah Agroforestri 6. Vol.3: 8-9]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2433</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>48</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0048-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Potret kearifan lokal dalam tata kelola keanekaragaman hayati</maintitle>
	<author>Subekti Rahayu and Harti Ningsih</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 6</secondtitle>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>6-7</mainpages>
	<abstract>Keanekaragaman hayati menjadi topik yang sangat menarik dibicarakan, karena beberapa hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi perubahan dalam kelimpahan dan komposisi akibat perubahan iklim dan penggunaan lahan. Bahkan beberapa
jenis keanekaragaman hayati dinyatakan terancam punah. Namun, keanekaragaman hayati lainnya justru menunjukkan peningkatan populasi yang tidak terkendali bahkan menjadi pengganggu bagi kehidupan lainnya, misalnya menjadi hama atau gulma.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Rahayu S and Ningsih H. "Potret kearifan lokal dalam tata kelola keanekaragaman hayati. "Kiprah Agroforestri 6. Vol.3: 6-7]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2432</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>47</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MA0047-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Hutan desa lubuk beringin: skenario konservasi kabupaten Bungo</maintitle>
	<author>Asep Ayat and Jusupta Tarigan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 6</secondtitle>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>3-5</mainpages>
	<abstract>Hutan Desa merupakan hutan negara yang dikelola oleh desa (Lembaga Desa) dan dimanfaatkan untuk kesejahteraan desa. Pembentukan Hutan Desa atas dasar pertimbangan pemberdayaan masyarakat di dalam dan sekitar kawasan hutan, untuk
mewujudkan pengelolaan hutan yang adil dan lestari. Kriteria kawasan hutan yang dapat ditetapkan sebagai areal kerja hutan desa adalah hutan lindung dan hutan produksi. Status kawasan belum dibebani hak pengelolaan atau ijin pemanfaatan dan
berada di wilayah administrasi desa yang bersangkutan. Kriteria tersebut berdasarkan rekomendasi dari Kepala Dinas kabupaten/kota yang diserahi tugas dan bertanggung jawab di bidang kehutanan. Hak pengelolaan hutan desa ini diberikan untuk jangka waktu paling lama 35 tahun dan dapat diperpanjang. Evaluasi akan dilakukan paling lama setiap 5 tahun sekali oleh pemberi hak (PP No 6 Tahun 2008).</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Ayat A and Tarigan J. "Hutan desa lubuk beringin: skenario konservasi kabupaten Bungo. "Kiprah Agroforestri 6. Vol.3: 3-5]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2431</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>388</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0388-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogen fertilizer use in China</maintitle>
	<author>Fredrich Kahrl, Yunju Li, Yufang Su, Timm Tennigkeit, Andreas Wilkes and Xu Jianchu</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle><![CDATA[Environmental Science & Policy]]></secondtitle>
	<publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher>
	<volume>13</volume>
	<mainpages>688 – 694</mainpages>
	<abstract>The use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers is an important driver of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China. This paper develops a GHG emission factor for synthetic N fertilizer application in China. Using this emission factor, we estimate the scale of GHG emissions from synthetic nitrogen fertilizer use in Chinese agriculture and explore the potential for GHG emission reductions from efficiency improvements in N fertilizer production and use. The paper concludes with a discussion on costs and financing for a large-scale fertilizer efficiency improvement program in China, and how a GHG mitigation framework might contribute to program design.</abstract>
	<keywords>Nitrogen fertilizer; Ammonia; Urea; Energy; Greenhouse gas emissions; China</keywords>
	<notes>doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.07.006</notes>
	<region>China</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation><![CDATA[Kahrl F, Yunju L, Yufang S, Tennigkeit T, Wilkes A and Xu Jianchu . 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogen fertilizer use in China. Environmental Science & Policy. 13: P. 688 – 694. <a href='http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_cdi=6198&_pubType=J&_acct=C000051642&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=1103372&md5=aeb803315dfb9b312acc39cfee482e97&jchunk=13#13' target='_blank'>URL</a>]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2430</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>387</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0387-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Reconciling root plasticity and architectural ground rules in tree root growth models with voxel automata</maintitle>
	<author>Rachmat Mulia, Christian Dupraz and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Plant and Soil</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-16</mainpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[Dynamic models of tree root growth and function have to reconcile the architectural rules for coarse root topology with the dynamics of fine root growth (and decay) in order to predict the strategic plus opportunistic behaviour of a tree root system in a
heterogeneous soil. We present an algorithm for a 3D model based on both local (soil voxel level) and global (tree level) controls of root growth, with development of structural roots as a consequence of fine root function, rather than as driver. The suggested allocation rules of carbon to fine root growth in each rooted voxel depend
on the success in water uptake in this voxel during the previous day, relative to overall supply and demand at plant level. The allocated C in each voxel is then split into proliferation (within voxel growth) and extension into neighbouring voxels (colonisation), with scaledependent thresholds and transfer coefficients. The fine
root colonisation process defines a dynamic and spatially explicit demand for transport functions. C allocation to development of a coarse root infrastructure linking all rooted voxels depends on the apparent need for adjustment of root diameter to meet the topologically defined sap flow through this voxel during the previous day. The allometric properties of the coarse root system are maintained to be in line with fractal branching
theory. The model can predict the dynamics of the shape and structure (fine root density, coarse root topology and biomass) of the root system either independently of soil conditions (purely genetically-driven) or including both the genetic and environmental effects of roots interacting with soil water supply and its external replenishment, linking in with existing water balance models. Sensitivity of the initial model to voxel dimensions was addressed through explicit scaling rules resulting in
scale-independent parameters. The model was parameterised for two tree species: hybrid walnut (<i>Juglans nigra  regia</i>) and wild cherry (<i>Prunus avium</i> L.) using results of a pot experiment. The model satisfactorily predicted the root growth behaviour of the two species. The model is sparse in parameters and yet applicable to heterogeneous soils, and could easily be upgraded to include additional local influences on root growth (and decay) such as local success in nutrient uptake or dynamic soil physical properties.<br/><br/>This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com]]></abstract>
	<keywords>Architecture . Coarse root . Fine root .
Geotropism . Heterogeneous soil . Simulation model . Topology .Voxel automata</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Mulia R, Dupraz C and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Reconciling root plasticity and architectural ground rules in tree root growth models with voxel automata. Plant and Soil. : P. 1-16.</citation>
	<publicationid>2429</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>297</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0297-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Integrated land use modelling in an interdisciplinary project: The LUCIA model</maintitle>
	<author>C. Marohn, P. Siripalangkanont, T. Berger, Betha Lusiana and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publicationplace>Montpellier, France</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>1-8</mainpages>
	<abstract>In the mountainous regions of Northwest Thailand and Vietnam political and economic change and demographic pressure have led to intensification of agricultural systems during the last decade. In the uplands, agricultural land expanded at the expense of forests and traditional swidden systems have been replaced by continuous cropping with reduced or no fallow. Subsistence-based systems are shifting towards external input-dependent production for the market, improving income of farmers in the short run, but partly leading to irreversible loss of environmental functions. The LUCIA model was developed in this context to dynamically simulate biophysical processes triggered by land use (change) in small mountainous catchments in a mechanistic and spatially explicit way. This paper describes the role of the model in integrating data generated under different knowledge domains in an interdisciplinary project to simulate scenarios of land use change, potential environmental impacts and alternative pathways towards sustainable land use. The model structure, stakeholder orientation and coupling with an existing multi-agent system are explained in more detail.</abstract>
	<keywords>Land use change; integrated model; coupling; Southeast Asia</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Marohn C, Siripalangkanont P, Berger T, Lusiana B and Cadisch G. 2010. Integrated land use modelling in an interdisciplinary project: The LUCIA model. Montpellier, France. </citation>
	<publicationid>2428</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>WP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>134</cnposition>
	<callnumber>WP0134-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Toward a General Theory of Boundary Work: Insights from the CGIAR?s Natural Resource Management Programs</maintitle>
	<author>William C. Clark, Thomas P Tomich, Meine van Noordwijk, Nancy M. Dickson, Delia Catacutan, David Guston and Elizabeth C. McNie</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Faculty Research Working Paper Series</secondtitle>
	<publisher>William C. Clark et al. and the President and Fellows of Harvard College</publisher>
	<edition>CID Working Paper No. 199</edition>
	<totalpages>22</totalpages>
	<abstract>Previous research on the determinants of effectiveness in knowledge systems seeking to support sustainable development has highlighted the importance of ?boundary work? through which research communities organize their relations with other fields of science, other sources of knowledge, and the worlds of action and policymaking. A growing body of scholarship postulates specific attributes of boundary work that promote used and useful research. These propositions, however, are largely based on the experience of a few industrialized countries. We report here on an effort to evaluate their relevance for efforts to harness science in support of sustainability in the developing world. We carried out a multi-country comparative analysis of natural resource management programs conducted under the auspices of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). We discovered 6 distinctive kinds of boundary work contributing to successes of the CGIAR programs?a greater variety than has been documented in previous studies. We propose that these different kinds of boundary work can be understood as a dual response to the different uses for which the results of specific research programs are intended, and the different sources of knowledge drawn on by those programs. We show that these distinctive kinds of boundary work require distinctive strategies to organize them effectively. Especially important are arrangements regarding participation of stakeholders, governance, and the use of boundary objects. We conclude that improving the ability of research programs to produce useful knowledge for sustainable development will require both
greater and differentiated support for multiple forms of boundary work</abstract>
	<keywords>boundary work, boundary organizations, boundary objects, agroforestry systems,
governance, participation, sustainability science, sustainable development, environmental policy</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Clark WC, Tomich TP, van Noordwijk M, Dickson NM, Catacutan D, Guston D and McNie EC. 2010. Toward a General Theory of Boundary Work: Insights from the CGIAR’s Natural Resource Management Programs. Faculty Research Working Paper Series. CID Working Paper No. 199: William C. Clark et al. and the President and Fellows of Harvard College. 22 p.</citation>
	<publicationid>2427</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>296</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0296-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Trade-off analysis of land use change, livelihoods and environmental services in the Upper Konto catchment (Indonesia): prospecting land use options with the FALLOW model</maintitle>
	<author>Betha Lusiana, Noviana Khususiyah, Kurniatun Hairiah, Meine van Noordwijk and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Conference on Integrative Landscape Modelling</secondtitle>
	<publicationplace>Montpellier, France</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>1-12</mainpages>
	<abstract>The study explored the use of the FALLOW model for assessing the impact of land use policies related to Designated Land Use to farmers? welfare and landscape carbon stocks in the Upper Konto catchment, East Java, Indonesia. A livestock (dairy cattle) module was added to FALLOW version 2.0 to enable simulating livelihood options in the area and four scenarios were explored: (0) baseline condition of protecting designated forest area, (1) full access to land, (2) conserving forest reserve only and (3) giving limited access to plant tree-based systems in part of state forest land. The study revealed that the current land use policy could lead to reduction in farmers? welfare (US$.capita-1.year-1) and average aboveground carbon stocks (Mg.ha-1). A change in land use policy by giving limited access to manage tree based systems in part of the State Forest Land could maintain the aboveground landscape carbon stocks level and reduced the decline of farmer?s welfare. The result showed the efficacy of integrating economic, biophysical and farmers? learning dynamics in a simulation model such as FALLOW to explore various policy scenarios for natural resource management. FALLOW enables to prospect potential landscape trajectories and its consequences on landscape level indicators such as welfare and carbon stocks, for further discussion with local stakeholders. The results of model performance evaluation based on spatial accuracy and area inaccuracy revealed the need to refine the current new land allocation module.</abstract>
	<keywords>landscape modelling; land use policy; scenario analysis; trade-off analysis</keywords>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Lusiana B, Khususiyah N, Hairiah K, van Noordwijk M and Cadisch G. 2010. Trade-off analysis of land use change, livelihoods and environmental services in the Upper Konto catchment (Indonesia): prospecting land use options with the FALLOW model. International Conference on Integrative Landscape Modelling. Montpellier, France.  <a href='http://www.symposcience.org/exl-doc/colloque/ART-00002423.pdf' target='_blank'>URL</a>]]></citation>
	<publicationid>2426</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>386</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0386-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Tree Growth Prediction in Relation to Simple Set of Site Quality Indicators for Six Native Tree Species in the Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Fernando Santos Martin, Betha Lusiana and Meine van Noordwijk</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>International Journal of Forestry Research</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-10</mainpages>
	<abstract>The gain in precision to explain the variation on tree growth performance as a function of a set of site indicators was analysed in a stepwise form, increasing its complexity and costs. Six native timber tree species were commonly found on farmer?s fields and planted under different types of agroforestry systems. Localization of trees to be used for measurement was achieved through individual interviews to assess timing of introduction of trees. Results proved that native tree species planted on farmers? fields have similar growth rate other exotic timber species as Swietenia macrophylla that are widely spread in the Philippines. Nevertheless, the large fraction of the variation in tree performance that could not be explained by the biophysical site indicators measured
implies that farmers take considerable risk in planting trees on the basis of current ?scientific? knowledge. The complement of ?site characteristics? is probably ?management?, and the low determination of tree growth by site properties may in fact be good news for the farmers.</abstract>
	<notes>doi:10.1155/2010/507392</notes>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Martin FS, Lusiana B and van Noordwijk M. 2010. Tree Growth Prediction in Relation to Simple Set of Site Quality Indicators for Six Native Tree Species in the Philippines. International Journal of Forestry Research. : P. 1-10.</citation>
	<publicationid>2425</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>264</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0264-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Masyarakat Adat dan Ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Martua T Sirait</author>
	<yearpubs>2009</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Universiteit van Amsterdam and Cordaid Memisa</publisher>
	<publicationplace>The Hague, The Netherlands</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>106</totalpages>
	<abstract>Telah banyak penelitian yang dilakukan melihat hubungan antara, semakin langkanya 
sumberdaya alam dan timbulnya konflik yang melibatkan kekerasan. Namun hubungan antara kedua fenomena ini dengan degradasi lingkungan hidup dan implikasinya bagi masyarakat adat masih belum terlalu banyak dipahami. Pada tiga studi kasus yang dilakukan pada pada empat kelompok sub-etnis masyarakat adat Dayak Bidayuh (Hibun, Sami, Jangkang dan Pompang) menggambarkan konflik dan kolaborasi antara masyarakat adat di Kalimantan Barat dalam kaitannya dengan ekspansi perkebunan kelapa sawit atas tanah adat mereka. Kajian ini tidak bertujuan untuk menyajikan besarnya konflik secara kwantitatif, misal jumlah orang atau rumah tangga yang terkena akibat konflik dan luasan tanah yang diambil oleh perusahaan perkebunan kelapa sawit, tetapi kajian ini berusaha menampilkan aspek aspek kwalitas dari konflik berupa perasaan masyarakat adatnya, usaha usaha penyelesaian konflik dan akibatnya bagi kelembagaan masyarakat adat dan wilayah adatnya. Walaupun studi ini tidak mewakili seluruh kejadian di Kalimantan Barat, akan tetapi memberikan gambaran yang cukup lengkap bagaimana masyarakat di pedesaan Kalimantan Barat mengahadapi perkebunan kelapa sawit skala besar dan bagaimana mereka berhadapan dengan kesempatan serta konflik yang diakibatkan oleh cara perkebunan memulai usahanya. Studi kasus yang dipaparkan mewakili kondisi dan tahapan konflik yang berbeda antara perkebunan kelapa sawit dan masyarakat adat yang secara indikatif menggambarkan situasi yang terjadi pada masyarakat adat di luar Kalimantan Barat. Penulis berpendapat bahwa situasi konflik yang serupa telah terjadi di Sumatera pada tahun 1970-1980s dan sedang atau akan segera terjadi di Papua, Sulawesi, dan kepulauan kecil di Indonesia Timur, seiring dengan ekspansi perkebunan kelapa sawit kearah Indonesia Timur.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Sirait MT. Masyarakat Adat dan Ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia. The Hague, The Netherlands. : Universiteit van Amsterdam and Cordaid Memisa. 2009. 106 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2424</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>NL</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>45</cnposition>
	<callnumber>NL0045-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Kiprah Agroforestri 6</maintitle>
	<author>Amelia Britaniari, Asep Ayat, Bambang Soeharto, Diah Wulandari, Erik Setiawan, Harti Ningsih, Jusupta Tarigan, Kurniatun Hairiah, Ni'matul Khasanah, Noviana Khususiyah, Subekti Rahayu and Tonni Asmawan</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office</publisher>
	<volume>3</volume>
	<edition>2</edition>
	<mainpages>16</mainpages>
	<abstract>Hutan dengan beragam atribut, fungsi dan manfaatnya sudah tidak terbantahkan oleh siapapun. Hutan tidak saja dibicarakan sebagai sumberdaya ekonomi, sosial, lingkungan Hdan budaya. Hutan sering juga dilukiskan bagaikan sebuah istana yang ditilami daun-daun kering yang lunak dan agak lembab. KIPRAH edisi kali ini dimulai dengan artikel mengenai skenario pelestarian hutan di salah satu kabupaten di propinsi Jambi. Tidak hanya hutan namun keanekaragaman hayati didalamnya juga penting untuk dilestarikan. Faktor apakah yang mempengaruhi kepunahannya? Menarik juga untuk membaca kondisi terkini keanekaragaman hayati dari sudut pandang wanita di Desa Danau, Tebing Tinggi dan Lubuk Beringin, kabupaten Bungo, Jambi.</abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Britaniari A, Ayat A, Soeharto B, Wulandari D, Setiawan E, Ningsih H, Tarigan J, Hairiah K, Khasanah N, Khususiyah N, Rahayu S and Asmawan T. 2010. Kiprah Agroforestri 6. In: Tarigan J, Rahayu S and Atikah T,eds. World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF, SEA Regional Office. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2, GRP 3, GRP 4, GRP 5, GRP 6</grp>
	<publicationid>2423</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PB</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>10</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PB0010-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Reducing emissions from deforestation, inside and outside the ?forest?</maintitle>
	<author>Andree Ekadinata, Meine van Noordwijk, Sonya Dewi and Peter A Minang</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Nairobi, Kenya</publicationplace>
	<edition>ASB PolicyBrief 16</edition>
	<totalpages>4</totalpages>
	<abstract><![CDATA[New data from Indonesia suggests that one-third of greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation originate from areas not officially defined as ?forest?.<br/>
Accounting for carbon in the whole landscape and Reducing Emissions from All Land Uses (REALU) can be more effective in reducing emissions.]]></abstract>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<webdisplay>0</webdisplay>
	<citation>Ekadinata A, van Noordwijk M, Dewi S and Minang PA. 2010. Reducing emissions from deforestation, inside and outside the ‘forest’. Nairobi, Kenya. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. 4 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 5</grp>
	<publicationid>2422</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>263</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0263-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Leuser Nurseries of Excellence (NOEL) Program: Community Nurseries for land rehabilitation, livelihood enhancement, and biodiversity conservation. 2010 1st quarter update</maintitle>
	<author>James M Roshetko</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office and Winrock International</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>3</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Roshetko JM. Leuser Nurseries of Excellence (NOEL) Program: Community Nurseries for land rehabilitation, livelihood enhancement, and biodiversity conservation. 2010 1st quarter update. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office and Winrock International. 2010. 3 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2421</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>RP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>262</cnposition>
	<callnumber>RP0262-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Leuser Nurseries of Excellence (NOEL) Program: Community Nurseries for land rehabilitation, livelihood enhancement, and biodiversity conservation. Annual Report Update.</maintitle>
	<author>James M Roshetko</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office and Winrock International</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>8</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Roshetko JM. Leuser Nurseries of Excellence (NOEL) Program: Community Nurseries for land rehabilitation, livelihood enhancement, and biodiversity conservation. Annual Report Update.. Bogor, Indonesia. : World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office and Winrock International. 2010. 8 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1</grp>
	<publicationid>2420</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>MN</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>46</cnposition>
	<callnumber>MN0046-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Pengelolaan Hutan Jati Rakyat:  Panduan Lapang Untuk Petani. (Management of Community Teak Forests: A Field Manual for Farmers)</maintitle>
	<author>Agus Asto Pramono, M. Anies Fauzi, Nurin Widyani, Ika Heriansyah and James M Roshetko</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<publisher>Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF SEA Regional Office, and The Ministry of Forestry's Research and Development Agency (FORDA)</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Bogor, Indonesia</publicationplace>
	<totalpages>45</totalpages>
	<region>Southeast Asia</region>
	<language>Indonesian</language>
	<citation>Pramono AA, Fauzi MA, Widyani N, Heriansyah I and Roshetko JM. 2010. Pengelolaan Hutan Jati Rakyat:  Panduan Lapang Untuk Petani. (Management of Community Teak Forests: A Field Manual for Farmers). Bogor, Indonesia. : Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), World Agroforestry Centre - ICRAF SEA Regional Office, and The Ministry of Forestry's Research and Development Agency (FORDA). 45 p.</citation>
	<grp>GRP 1, GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2419</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>295</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0295-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Insights from the farm forestry tree seedling nursery sector in Western Java, Indonesia</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Paul Dargusch and Nestor Gregorio</author>
	<editor>Stephen R. Harrison, Annerine Bosch, Nestor Onting Gregorio and John L. Herbohn</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector.</secondtitle>
	<publisher>University of Queensland, Australia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Leyte, the Philippines</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>21-25</mainpages>
	<abstract>This paper reports observations of a study tour by the authors of the farm forestry tree seeding nursery sector in Western Java, Indonesia. Industry stakeholders were found to recognise and value high quality germplasm and seedling quality for commercial farm forestry success. These quality preferences of stakeholders are supported by the use of a simple tree seedling certification scheme through which certified seedlings receive a premium selling price. Other initiatives, including government extension efforts, tree seed centres and vegetative propagation, provide complementary support for the preference and promotion of high seedling quality in the Western Java farm forestry industry.</abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Mercado Jr. AR, Dargusch P and Gregorio N. 2010. Insights from the farm forestry tree seedling nursery sector in Western Java, Indonesia. In: Harrison SR, Bosch A, Gregorio NO and Herbohn JL,eds. Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector.. Leyte, the Philippines. University of Queensland, Australia. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2418</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>294</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0294-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Profiling tree nurseries in northern Mindanao, the Philippines</maintitle>
	<author>Don Immanuel Edralin and Augustin R. Mercado Jr.</author>
	<editor>Stephen R. Harrison, Annerine Bosch, Nestor Onting Gregorio and John L. Herbohn</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector.</secondtitle>
	<publisher>University of Queensland, Australia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Leyte, the Philippines</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>63-72</mainpages>
	<abstract>Forestry nurseries play an important role in supporting small-scale plantation, tree farming as well as government initiated afforestation and reforestation programs. However, constraints have been identified in the forestry nursery sector in the Philippines particularly in the supply of high quality planting materials. This hindrance is being investigated to formulate intervention points as part of a continuing research project on enhancing tree seedling supply via economic and policy changes, funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). This paper presents baseline information regarding the profile of forestry nurseries in the Northern Mindanao region of the Philippines through a personal interview survey of operators of private, communal and government nurseries. Most nurseries in all nursery types are operating on a small scale and are strategically situated based on the purpose of their existence. Private nurseries, being business oriented, are located near the main road, as are government nurseries which distribute seedlings mostly without charge but in some cases for sale. Communal nurseries are mostly situated on farms since they cater for the seedling needs of their members and are therefore established far away from main roads. In terms of stability, private and government nurseries are stable compared to communal nurseries which rely on support organizations. When the support stops communal nurseries also cease to operate. There is no current policy that supports the production and use of high quality seedlings. Intervention points to address these problems are seen as necessary extension efforts in promoting the use of high quality seedlings, thereby in effect creating a strong market, training operators to increase their capability to produce high quality seedlings, and promoting and supporting the forestry nursery industry with policies such as tree nursery certification.</abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Edralin DI and Mercado Jr. AR. 2010. Profiling tree nurseries in northern Mindanao, the Philippines. In: Harrison SR, Bosch A, Gregorio NO and Herbohn JL,eds. Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector.. Leyte, the Philippines. University of Queensland, Australia. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2417</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>293</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0293-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>The need for improved nursery management practices and marketing in tree nurseries of norther Mindanao</maintitle>
	<author>Don Immanuel Edralin and Augustin R. Mercado Jr.</author>
	<editor>Stephen R. Harrison, Annerine Bosch, Nestor Onting Gregorio and John L. Herbohn</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector</secondtitle>
	<publisher>University of Queensland, Australia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Leyte, the Philippines</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>177-182</mainpages>
	<abstract>Undoubtedly, tree growing provides economic and environmental benefits. This has resulted in tree growing initiatives in Northern Mindanao. However, tree growing is faced with constraints such as high field mortality and poor timber stand resulting in poor timber yield. This paper seeks to discern the seedling quality of seedlings grown in three different nursery types in Northern Mindanao, including the facilities present and some cultural management practices. Seedling quality was assessed through random sampling of planting materials. Information about nursery facilities and cultural management practices were obtained through interviews with nursery operators and through visual observations. Results show that private, communal and government nurseries have facilities designed for low cost production of seedlings. The lack of hardening beds and raised benches used for seedling acclimatization explains the inability of seedlings to survive when outplanted in the field. A seedling quality assessment revealed that seedlings were of low quality in all nursery types with weak stems, imbalanced root-shoot ratio and J-root formation. It was also found that most nurseries did not apply soil treatment which is one of the basics for growing seedlings. There is an urgent need to improve nursery management practices by employing best management practices such as proper hardening techniques using effective but non-expensive hardening beds and soil sterilization to improve the seedling quality of seedlings in the region.</abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation>Edralin DI and Mercado Jr. AR. 2010. The need for improved nursery management practices and marketing in tree nurseries of norther Mindanao. In: Harrison SR, Bosch A, Gregorio NO and Herbohn JL,eds. Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector. Leyte, the Philippines. University of Queensland, Australia. </citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2416</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>PP</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>292</cnposition>
	<callnumber>PP0292-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Ensuring seedling quality through nursery accreditation</maintitle>
	<author>Don Immanuel Edralin and Augustin R. Mercado Jr.</author>
	<editor>Stephen R. Harrison, Annerine Bosch, Nestor Onting Gregorio and John L. Herbohn</editor>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector</secondtitle>
	<publisher>University of Queensland, Australia</publisher>
	<publicationplace>Leyte, the Philippines</publicationplace>
	<mainpages>157-162</mainpages>
	<abstract>The fruit tree nursery accreditation scheme implemented by the Philippine Department of Agriculture (DA) has been promoted to enhance the supply of high quality fruit tree planting materials and reduce the number of dubious seedling market players. This paper examines the advantages of the fruit tree nursery accreditation scheme and draws implications for possible formulation of a scheme to accredit forest tree nurseries in the Philippines. Data were collected from interviews with accredited fruit tree nursery operators and the nursery accreditation officer-in-charge in Northern Mindanao. There has been an increase in the number of applicants for nursery accreditation each year since 2004, as a result of the advantages nursery operators observed from those who had already been accredited. A major advantage is that only accredited fruit tree nursery operators can join in the government procurement of seedlings through a bidding process which is always for substantial volumes. As a form of advertisement, accredited nurseries are posted on the government website thus creating a wide range of market opportunities which results in increased sales. Other advantages such as receiving free training in improving seedling production and occasionally receiving high quality propagation materials (scions and seedlings), subsidies for pesticides and fertilizers and free soil tests were enjoyed by accredited fruit tree nurseries. These opportunities encouraged other nursery operators to apply for accreditation. Accreditation by the DA places emphasis on maintaining high genetic quality of planting materials as well as the physical quality of the seedlings. Accrediting forestry nurseries is seen as a potential policy option that can expand the supply of high quality tree seedlings in the Philippines, as is the case with fruit tree seedlings.</abstract>
	<region>Philippines</region>
	<language>English</language>
	<citation><![CDATA[Edralin DI and Mercado Jr. AR. 2010. Ensuring seedling quality through nursery accreditation. In: Harrison SR, Bosch A, Gregorio NO and Herbohn JL,eds. Proceedings from the Mid-term Workshop (ASEM/2006/091). Improving the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Philippines Tree Nursery Sector. Leyte, the Philippines. University of Queensland, Australia.  <a href='http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:200344/Mercado18.pdf' target='_blank'>URL</a>]]></citation>
	<grp>GRP 2</grp>
	<publicationid>2415</publicationid>
	<producttypeid>JA</producttypeid>
	<cnposition>385</cnposition>
	<callnumber>JA0385-10</callnumber>
	<maintitle>Positive nitrogen balance of Acacia mangium woodlots as fallows in the Philippines based on 15N natural abundance data of N2 fixation</maintitle>
	<author>Augustin R. Mercado Jr., Meine van Noordwijk and Georg Cadisch</author>
	<yearpubs>2010</yearpubs>
	<secondtitle>Agroforestry Systems</secondtitle>
	<publisher>Springer Science+Business Media B.V.</publisher>
	<mainpages>1-13</mainpages>
	<abstract>Nitrogen inputs from biological nitrogen fixation contribute to productivity and sustainability of agroforestry systems but they need to be able to offset export of N when trees are harvested. This study assessed magnitudes of biological nitrogen fixation (natural 15N abundance) and N balance of Acacia mangium woodlots grown in farmer?s fields, and determined if N2 fixation capacity was affected by tree age. Tree biomass, standing litter, understory vegetation and soil samplings were conducted in 15
farmer?s fields growing A. mangium as a form of sequential agroforestry in Claveria, Misamis Oriental, Philippines. The trees corresponded to ages of 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 years, and were replicated three times. Samples from different plant parts and soils (0? 100 cm) were collected and analyzed for d15N and nutrients. The B-value, needed as a reference of isotopic discrimination when fully reliant on atmospheric N, was generated by growing A. mangium in an N2-free sand culture in the glasshouse. Isotopic discrimination 
