CGIAR Future Harvest

News

Home | About | Themes | Current Projects | Publications | Products | Training & Education | Networks | Staff | Job
MEDIA RELEASE

"Why has transition from relief to rehabilitation been so slow?"
(The Jakarta Post - Opinion, December 26th, 2005)


» Click here to read the Opinion article (pdf)
»
Click here to see detail on workshop related to this article: "Post Tsunami Livelihoods & INRM in Aceh: 
   
Almost a Year of Recovery from Shock". 22 December 2005, Bogor, Indonesia

Back

The biggest challenge facing all organizations working in the region is coordination. From a chaotic start, the organization of the direct relief activities emerged relatively smoothly. But for the transition to sustainable livelihood programs, more is needed than just continuing at the locations where the various organizations happened to start. Parts of the affected area are over-supplied with agencies. Others parts are still ignored. Representatives of locally-based NGOs who witnessed the arrival of the international agencies tell stories of up to five of them trying to work in the same area with overlapping agendas and without any coordination.

In spite of the multiple programs attempting to provide boats, a lack of adequate communication has meant that this has also not been as useful an exercise as it might have been. For young fishermen from Samatiga, near Meulaboh, the cost of replacing boats is still prohibitive, both due to the price of the wood, transported over a long distance, and the labour for construction.

There are many more stories about the difficulties the boat building programs have encountered, such as donated boats being sold instead of used, boats being delivered to farmers instead of fishers, boats of the wrong type and in inadequate number. Although there are clearly many difficulties in transaction, the basic problem appears to be one of needs assessment.

Lack of coordination in rebuilding is not only a problem between NGOs. While the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency (BRR) that is responsible for managing the government's activities in the area has made valiant efforts, local government has not been sufficiently involved. Current efforts are not building human capacity at this level. Again, the "micro" approach of the NGO's and their hope for "community initiatives" could become tokenism if there is no improvement in the missing middle layer of co-ordination.

Clearly, many of Aceh's problems cannot be solved through short-term measures. Yet at the Meulaboh workshop there was a great deal of goodwill expressed between organizations, and there appeared to be a real desire for greater unity in addressing the problems.

It is time for us to recognise how the available human, natural and financial resources can be best used to re-build not only houses, but to build livelihoods to a standard better than those before the tsunami disaster.

For details please contact: 
- Meine van Noordwijk (m.van-noordwijk@cgiar.org)
- Trudy O'Connor (t.oconnor@cgiar.org) or 
- Gerhard Manurung (g.manurung@cgiar.org)

Further Information: http://www.cgiar.org/tsunami
Interested to know more detail about the CGIAR Tsunami website? Please contact Anggoro Santoso.

More updates info on Aceh: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sea/W-New/aceh.asp

 

WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE - SOUTH EAST ASIA
http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea